SHANGHAI SIPG vs Buriram United — AFC Champions League Elite
← Back

Unlock all Match Predictions
Full mathematical models, value detection and advanced filters across every league.
billed annually · cancel anytime
SHANGHAI SIPG and Buriram United meet in the AFC Champions League Elite 2026 season on 24 November 2026. SHANGHAI SIPG have recorded 16 wins from 37 matches this season (43% win rate), averaging 1.73 goals scored and 1.49 conceded per game. BTTS has occurred in 68% of their fixtures; Over 2.5 goals in 62%; and clean sheets in 19% of games. Buriram United have won 55% of their 11 matches, with 2.09 goals scored and 0.82 conceded per game. Their BTTS rate stands at 45%, Over 2.5 at 45%, and clean sheets at 45%.
Based on our 7-model ensemble (Poisson, Dixon-Coles, Weighted Form, Normalized, Shots, Elo and Combined), the expected goals are 1.55 for SHANGHAI SIPG and 1.23 for Buriram United. The models give SHANGHAI SIPG a 44% win probability, with a draw at 26% and an Buriram United win at 30%. Over 2.5 goals is estimated at 53% and BTTS at 55%.
Season Statistics
Home vs Away
Goals Scored
| SHANGHAI SIPG | Home | Away | Buriram United | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 Scored | 84% | 82% | 85% | 82% | 67% | 100% |
| Over 1.5 Scored | 49% | 41% | 55% | 45% | 50% | 40% |
| Over 2.5 Scored | 24% | 18% | 30% | 36% | 33% | 40% |
| Failed To Score | 16% | 18% | 15% | 18% | 33% | 0% |
Goals Conceded
| SHANGHAI SIPG | Home | Away | Buriram United | Home | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 Conceded | 81% | 76% | 85% | 55% | 67% | 40% |
| Over 1.5 Conceded | 41% | 24% | 55% | 18% | 33% | 0% |
| Over 2.5 Conceded | 14% | 0% | 25% | 9% | 17% | 0% |
| Clean Sheets | 19% | 24% | 15% | 45% | 33% | 60% |
Over 2.5 & BTTS Predictions
| SHANGHAI SIPG | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 97% | 91% |
| Over 1.5 | 84% | 64% |
| Over 2.5 | 62% | 45% |
| Over 3.5 | 38% | 36% |
| Over 4.5 | 22% | 27% |
| BTTS | 68% | 45% |
| BTTS & Win | 27% | 18% |
| BTTS & Draw | 24% | 18% |
| BTTS & Over 2.5 | 51% | 27% |
| BTTS No & Over 2.5 | 11% | 18% |
1st Half / 2nd Half
| SHANGHAI SIPG | Buriram United | |
|---|---|---|
| Win 1st Half | 32% | 55% |
| Draw 1st Half | 43% | 36% |
| Loss 1st Half | 24% | 9% |
| Scored 1st Half | 49% | 82% |
| Conceded 1st Half | 41% | 27% |
| Win 2nd Half | 38% | 18% |
| Draw 2nd Half | 27% | 55% |
| Loss 2nd Half | 35% | 27% |
| Scored 2nd Half | 70% | 27% |
| Conceded 2nd Half | 62% | 45% |
| Over 0.5 HT | 70% | 82% |
| Over 1.5 HT | 38% | 55% |
Recent Venue Form
Number of Corners
| Match Corners | SHANGHAI SIPG | Buriram United | League Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 6 | 77% | 80% | 79% |
| Over 7 | 63% | 80% | 59% |
| Over 8 | 57% | 80% | 55% |
| Over 9 | 53% | 60% | 45% |
| Over 10 | 47% | 60% | 41% |
| Over 11 | 33% | 40% | 24% |
| Over 12 | 27% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 13 | 17% | 20% | 7% |
Team Corners
| Team Corners | SHANGHAI SIPG | Buriram United |
|---|---|---|
| Corners Earned / Match | 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Corners Against / Match | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Over 2.5 Corners For | 80% | 60% |
| Over 3.5 Corners For | 70% | 60% |
| Over 4.5 Corners For | 57% | 60% |
| Over 2.5 Corners Against | 73% | 60% |
| Over 3.5 Corners Against | 53% | 60% |
| Over 4.5 Corners Against | 43% | 40% |
Head to Head · 2 matches
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +7 | 6 | |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +7 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +4 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +5 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +3 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +2 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +3 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -5 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -5 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -8 | 0 |