Chatham Cup — Halbzeittabelle 2. Hälfte
New-Zealand · 2026
Spitzenreiter:Cashmere Technical — 7ptsLiga Ø:2.53 goals
Höchster Ø:Dunedin City Royals (5.00)
Niedrigster Ø:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Gesamt / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cashmere Technical | 3 | 2-1-0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.67 |
| 2 |  Auckland City | 2 | 2-0-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 3 |  Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 2-0-1 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
| 4 |  Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 5 |  Fencibles United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 6 |  Miramar | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 7 |  Auckland United | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
| 8 | Hibiscus Coast | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 |  Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 10 |  Melville United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 11 |  South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 |  Cambridge | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 13 |  Takapuna | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 14 |  Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 15 |  Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 16 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Cashmere Technical führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit gesamt mit 7 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (2S-1U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.67 Toren pro Spiel.
Auckland City folgt auf Platz 2 mit 6 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 2.53 Tore pro Spiel, mit Dunedin City Royals als höchstem Wert (5.00).
Spitzenreiter:Nelson Suburbs — 6ptsLiga Ø:2.57 goalsHöchster Ø:Dunedin City Royals (5.00)Niedrigster Ø:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Heim / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 2-0-0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 2 | Fencibles United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Auckland City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 5 | Auckland United | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 6 | Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 7 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Melville United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 10 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Heim 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Nelson Suburbs führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit zu Hause mit 6 Punkten aus 2 Spielen (2S-0U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.50 Toren pro Spiel.
Fencibles United folgt auf Platz 2 mit 6 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 2.57 Tore pro Spiel, mit Dunedin City Royals als höchstem Wert (5.00).
Spitzenreiter:Napier City Rovers — 6ptsLiga Ø:2.47 goalsHöchster Ø:Cashmere Technical (5.00)Niedrigster Ø:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Auswärts / 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (2H) | PPSp (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 2 | Miramar | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 1-0-0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 4 | Auckland City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 5 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 | South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 7 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 9 | Auckland United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 10 | Takapuna | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 11 | Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Auswärts 2. Halbzeit-Tabelle
Napier City Rovers führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der zweiten Halbzeit auswärts mit 6 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (2S-0U-1N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 1.67 Toren pro Spiel.
Miramar folgt auf Platz 2 mit 4 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 2.47 Tore pro Spiel, mit Cashmere Technical als höchstem Wert (5.00).