AFC Challenge League — Halbzeittabelle 1. Hälfte
World · 2026/27
World — AFC Challenge League 2026/27 — Detailstatistiken
Spitzenreiter:Wathba — 8ptsLiga Ø:0.98 goals
Höchster Ø:Manila Digger (2.00)
Niedrigster Ø:Yangon United (0.00)Gesamt / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wathba | 4 | 2-2-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 8 | DDWW | 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 2 | Manila Digger | 3 | 2-1-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 3 |  Al Qadsia | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 4 |  Goa | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 5 |  Al Ittihad | 4 | 2-1-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 7 | DWLW | 1.75 | 75% | 0% | 50% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 6 |  Ahal | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 7 |  Hang Yuen | 4 | 1-3-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | DDDW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 1.25 |
| 8 |  Al Ansar | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 9 |  Al Nejmeh | 3 | 1-2-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
| 10 |  Tainan City | 3 | 1-2-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 5 | DWD | 1.67 | 100% | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
| 11 |  Shan United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 12 |  Istiqlol | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | DWL | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 13 |  Regar-TadAZ | 4 | 1-1-2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 4 | WLLD | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 75% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 14 |  Kasuka | 4 | 1-1-2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 | DLLW | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 |  Paro | 4 | 1-1-2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 | DLLW | 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 1.50 |
| 16 | Yangon United | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | DDD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 17 |  Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 18 |  Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 19 |  Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 20 |  Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 21 |  Pusamania Borneo | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 22 |  Al Arabi | 3 | 0-1-2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DLL | 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 23 |  Fortis | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 | LLLD | 0.25 | 25% | 0% | 100% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 24 |  Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 25 |  Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 26 |  Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 27 |  Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 28 |  Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Halbzeit-Tabelle
Wathba führt die AFC Challenge League-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit gesamt mit 8 Punkten aus 4 Spielen (2S-2U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 1.00 Toren pro Spiel.
Manila Digger folgt auf Platz 2 mit 7 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 0.98 Tore pro Spiel, mit Manila Digger als höchstem Wert (2.00).
Spitzenreiter:Al Ittihad — 7ptsLiga Ø:0.99 goalsHöchster Ø:Manila Digger (2.00)Niedrigster Ø:Pusamania Borneo (0.00)Heim / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ittihad | 3 | 2-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 2 | Manila Digger | 2 | 2-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 3 | Ahal | 2 | 2-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Goa | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 5 | Istiqlol | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 6 | Tainan City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 7 | Al Qadsia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Al Ansar | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Al Nejmeh | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 10 | Paro | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Kasuka | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 12 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 13 | Wathba | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 14 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 15 | Yangon United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 16 | Shan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 17 | Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 18 | Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 19 | Al Arabi | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 20 | Fortis | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 21 | Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 22 | Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 | Regar-TadAZ | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Heim Halbzeit-Tabelle
Al Ittihad führt die AFC Challenge League-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit zu Hause mit 7 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (2S-1U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 0.67 Toren pro Spiel.
Manila Digger folgt auf Platz 2 mit 6 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 0.99 Tore pro Spiel, mit Manila Digger als höchstem Wert (2.00).
Spitzenreiter:Wathba — 7ptsLiga Ø:1.06 goalsHöchster Ø:Shan United (2.00)Niedrigster Ø:Yangon United (0.00)Auswärts / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wathba | 3 | 2-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 2 | Al Qadsia | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 3 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 4 | Regar-TadAZ | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | WLD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 5 | Goa | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 | Shan United | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 7 | Al Ansar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 8 | Al Nejmeh | 2 | 0-2-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 9 | Yangon United | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 10 | Manila Digger | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Tainan City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 12 | Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 13 | Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 14 | Kasuka | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 | Paro | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 17 | Al Arabi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 18 | Istiqlol | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 19 | Al Ittihad | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 20 | Ahal | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 21 | Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 22 | Fortis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 | Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 24 | Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Auswärts Halbzeit-Tabelle
Wathba führt die AFC Challenge League-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit auswärts mit 7 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (2S-1U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 0.67 Toren pro Spiel.
Al Qadsia folgt auf Platz 2 mit 4 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.06 Tore pro Spiel, mit Shan United als höchstem Wert (2.00).