Chatham Cup — 2nd Half Table
New-Zealand · 2026
Leader:Cashmere Technical — 7ptsLeague Avg:2.53 goals
Highest Avg:Dunedin City Royals (5.00)
Lowest Avg:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Overall / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cashmere Technical | 3 | 2-1-0 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.67 |
| 2 |  Auckland City | 2 | 2-0-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 3 |  Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 2-0-1 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
| 4 |  Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 5 |  Fencibles United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 6 |  Miramar | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 7 |  Auckland United | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.00 |
| 8 | Hibiscus Coast | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 |  Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 10 |  Melville United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 11 |  South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 |  Cambridge | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 13 |  Takapuna | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 14 |  Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 15 |  Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 16 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — 2nd Half Table
Cashmere Technical leads the Chatham Cup second half table overall with 7 points from 3 games (2W-1D-0L), averaging 2.67 goals per game.
Auckland City follows in second place with 6 points. The league average at second half overall is 2.53 goals per game, with Dunedin City Royals recording the highest average at 5.00.
Leader:Nelson Suburbs — 6ptsLeague Avg:2.57 goalsHighest Avg:Dunedin City Royals (5.00)Lowest Avg:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Home / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 2-0-0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 2 | Fencibles United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Auckland City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 5 | Auckland United | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 6 | Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 7 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Melville United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 10 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Home 2nd Half Table
Nelson Suburbs leads the Chatham Cup second half table at home with 6 points from 2 games (2W-0D-0L), averaging 2.50 goals per game.
Fencibles United follows in second place with 6 points. The league average at second half at home is 2.57 goals per game, with Dunedin City Royals recording the highest average at 5.00.
Leader:Napier City Rovers — 6ptsLeague Avg:2.47 goalsHighest Avg:Cashmere Technical (5.00)Lowest Avg:Hibiscus Coast (1.00)Away / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 2 | Miramar | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 1-0-0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 4 | Auckland City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 5 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 | South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 7 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 9 | Auckland United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 10 | Takapuna | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 11 | Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Away 2nd Half Table
Napier City Rovers leads the Chatham Cup second half table away with 6 points from 3 games (2W-0D-1L), averaging 1.67 goals per game.
Miramar follows in second place with 4 points. The league average at second half away is 2.47 goals per game, with Cashmere Technical recording the highest average at 5.00.