MatchPulse
1. Division

1. Division — BTTS

Denmark · 2026/27

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%Home%Away%
1Hobro131077%71%83%
2Hvidovre12975%83%67%
3Kolding IF12975%67%83%
4Esbjerg12867%83%50%
5Aalborg13862%43%83%
6Vejle12758%83%33%
7Vendsyssel FF12758%20%86%
8HB Koge12758%67%50%
9Hillerød12758%67%50%
10Aarhus Fremad12650%67%33%
11AB Copenhagen12542%33%50%
12FC Fredericia12542%33%50%

Home / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Vejle6583%
2Esbjerg6583%
3Hvidovre6583%
4Hobro7571%
5HB Koge6467%
6Kolding IF6467%
7Aarhus Fremad6467%
8Hillerød6467%
9Aalborg7343%
10AB Copenhagen6233%
11FC Fredericia6233%
12Vendsyssel FF5120%

Away / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Vendsyssel FF7686%
2Aalborg6583%
3Hobro6583%
4Kolding IF6583%
5Hvidovre6467%
6Esbjerg6350%
7AB Copenhagen6350%
8FC Fredericia6350%
9HB Koge6350%
10Hillerød6350%
11Vejle6233%
12Aarhus Fremad6233%

Which teams are involved in the most BTTS games?

Hobro has the highest BTTS rate in the league — 77%

Hvidovre is #2 for BTTS rate — 75%

Kolding IF is #3 for BTTS rate — 75%

FC Fredericia has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 42%

AB Copenhagen has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 42%

Aarhus Fremad has one of the lowest BTTS rates — 50%

League BTTS Stats

  • consists of 12 teams
  • League BTTS rate: 60%
  • Home BTTS rate: 60%
  • Away BTTS rate: 60%

1st Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Vejle12542%50%33%
2Aalborg13431%14%50%
3Hobro13431%14%50%
4Esbjerg12325%33%17%
5Kolding IF12325%17%33%
6HB Koge12217%33%0%
7Hillerød12217%17%17%
8Vendsyssel FF1218%20%0%
9AB Copenhagen1218%0%17%
10FC Fredericia1218%17%0%
11Hvidovre1218%17%0%
12Aarhus Fremad1218%0%17%

Home / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Vejle6350%
2Esbjerg6233%
3HB Koge6233%
4Vendsyssel FF5120%
5FC Fredericia6117%
6Hvidovre6117%
7Kolding IF6117%
8Hillerød6117%
9Aalborg7114%
10Hobro7114%
11AB Copenhagen600%
12Aarhus Fremad600%

Away / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Aalborg6350%
2Hobro6350%
3Vejle6233%
4Kolding IF6233%
5Esbjerg6117%
6AB Copenhagen6117%
7Aarhus Fremad6117%
8Hillerød6117%
9Vendsyssel FF700%
10FC Fredericia600%
11HB Koge600%
12Hvidovre600%

1st Half BTTS Insights

Vejle has the highest BTTS rate in 1H — 42%

Aalborg is #2 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

Hobro is #3 for BTTS in 1H — 31%

Aarhus Fremad rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

Hvidovre rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

FC Fredericia rarely sees BTTS in 1H — 8%

1ST HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 1H BTTS league rate: 19%
  • Home 1H BTTS rate: 19%
  • Away 1H BTTS rate: 19%
  • Teams with 1H BTTS ≥20%: 42% (5/12)

2nd Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Esbjerg12758%67%50%
2Vejle12542%50%33%
3HB Koge12542%33%50%
4Hobro13538%29%50%
5Hvidovre12433%33%33%
6Aalborg13431%14%50%
7Aarhus Fremad12325%50%0%
8Hillerød12325%33%17%
9Vendsyssel FF12217%0%29%
10AB Copenhagen12217%0%33%
11FC Fredericia12217%17%17%
12Kolding IF12217%33%0%

Home / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Esbjerg6467%
2Vejle6350%
3Aarhus Fremad6350%
4HB Koge6233%
5Hvidovre6233%
6Kolding IF6233%
7Hillerød6233%
8Hobro7229%
9FC Fredericia6117%
10Aalborg7114%
11Vendsyssel FF500%
12AB Copenhagen600%

Away / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Aalborg6350%
2Esbjerg6350%
3Hobro6350%
4HB Koge6350%
5Vejle6233%
6AB Copenhagen6233%
7Hvidovre6233%
8Vendsyssel FF7229%
9FC Fredericia6117%
10Hillerød6117%
11Kolding IF600%
12Aarhus Fremad600%

2nd Half BTTS Insights

Esbjerg has the highest BTTS rate in 2H — 58%

Vejle is #2 for BTTS in 2H — 42%

HB Koge is #3 for BTTS in 2H — 42%

Kolding IF rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 17%

FC Fredericia rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 17%

AB Copenhagen rarely sees BTTS in 2H — 17%

2ND HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 2H BTTS league rate: 30%
  • Home 2H BTTS rate: 30%
  • Away 2H BTTS rate: 30%
  • Teams with 2H BTTS ≥40%: 25% (3/12)

1. Division (Denmark) — BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Analysis

In the 1. Division (Denmark), both teams score in 121% of matches this season. Hobro is involved in the most BTTS games with a rate of 77% (10 games), with 71% at home and 83% away. FC Fredericia has the lowest BTTS rate at 42%.

Betting Angle — BTTS Markets

BTTS Yes is most reliable when two high-BTTS teams meet. When a top-BTTS team faces a low-BTTS team, consider BTTS No — the defensive team may suppress the higher-BTTS side. Always combine with goals-conceded data for the full picture.

Statistics Tables — Denmark