Super League Women — Home Advantage
South-Africa · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  University of Fort Hare W | +47% | -7% | +100% | 2.67/2.00 |
| 2 |  Richmond United W | +29% | +65% | -8% | 1.00/0.29 |
| 3 |  Ramatlaohle W | +21% | +8% | +33% | 1.50/1.00 |
| 4 |  Ezemvelo W | +20% | +40% | 0% | 1.17/0.67 |
| 5 |  City Lads W | +14% | +30% | -2% | 0.60/0.43 |
| 6 |  University of Johannesburg W | +13% | -8% | +34% | 2.29/1.67 |
| 7 |  Tshwane University W | +12% | +2% | +22% | 1.67/1.00 |
| 8 |  Diepkloof W | +10% | 0% | +20% | 0.67/0.67 |
| 9 |  Copperbelt Ladies W | +5% | +7% | +4% | 1.43/1.40 |
| 10 |  Pretoria U. W | +3% | +13% | -8% | 1.83/1.71 |
| 11 |  UWC W | -2% | -1% | -3% | 1.86/1.83 |
| 12 |  Mamelodi Sundowns W | -10% | -21% | 0% | 2.67/3.00 |
| 13 |  Stellenbosch W | -14% | -20% | -8% | 0.50/1.00 |
| 14 |  JVW FC W | -18% | -4% | -32% | 2.00/1.50 |
| 15 |  TS Galaxy W | -21% | -18% | -24% | 1.17/2.00 |
| 16 |  First Touch W | -25% | +18% | -67% | 0.71/1.33 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Super League Women (South-Africa), the average home win rate is 44% compared to 39% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. University of Fort Hare W shows the strongest home advantage, winning 83% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +33%). At the other end, TS Galaxy W actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 67% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richmond United W | +65% | 1.33 | 0.29 |
| 2 | Ezemvelo W | +40% | 1.17 | 0.50 |
| 3 | City Lads W | +30% | 0.80 | 0.43 |
| 4 | First Touch W | +18% | 0.71 | 0.50 |
| 5 | Pretoria U. W | +13% | 1.67 | 1.29 |
| 6 | Ramatlaohle W | +8% | 1.17 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Copperbelt Ladies W | +7% | 1.14 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Tshwane University W | +2% | 1.50 | 1.43 |
| 9 | Diepkloof W | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 10 | UWC W | -1% | 1.14 | 1.17 |
| 11 | JVW FC W | -4% | 1.86 | 2.00 |
| 12 | University of Fort Hare W | -7% | 1.17 | 1.33 |
| 13 | University of Johannesburg W | -8% | 1.71 | 2.00 |
| 14 | TS Galaxy W | -18% | 1.17 | 1.67 |
| 15 | Stellenbosch W | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 16 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | -21% | 2.83 | 4.33 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Richmond United W has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Super League Women (South-Africa), netting 1.33 goals/match at home versus 0.29 away — a Scoring Advantage of +65%. In contrast, Mamelodi Sundowns W scores more away (4.33/match) than at home (2.83/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -21% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Fort Hare W | +100% | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| 2 | University of Johannesburg W | +34% | 0.57 | 1.17 |
| 3 | Ramatlaohle W | +33% | 0.83 | 1.67 |
| 4 | Tshwane University W | +22% | 1.00 | 1.57 |
| 5 | Diepkloof W | +20% | 1.33 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Copperbelt Ladies W | +4% | 1.29 | 1.40 |
| 7 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | Ezemvelo W | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| 9 | City Lads W | -2% | 2.40 | 2.29 |
| 10 | UWC W | -3% | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 11 | Richmond United W | -8% | 2.67 | 2.29 |
| 12 | Pretoria U. W | -8% | 1.17 | 1.00 |
| 13 | Stellenbosch W | -8% | 2.00 | 1.71 |
| 14 | TS Galaxy W | -24% | 2.17 | 1.33 |
| 15 | JVW FC W | -32% | 1.29 | 0.67 |
| 16 | First Touch W | -67% | 1.71 | 0.33 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Defence Analysis
University of Fort Hare W has the best home defensive record in the Super League Women (South-Africa), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.83 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, First Touch W concedes more at home (1.71/match) than away (0.33/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richmond United W | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Ezemvelo W | +71% | 1.00 | 0.17 |
| 3 | University of Johannesburg W | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 4 | University of Fort Hare W | -2% | 0.80 | 0.83 |
| 5 | First Touch W | -2% | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| 6 | Pretoria U. W | -3% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| 7 | Tshwane University W | -7% | 0.50 | 0.57 |
| 8 | UWC W | -8% | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| 9 | Ramatlaohle W | -14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 10 | Copperbelt Ladies W | -17% | 0.57 | 0.80 |
| 11 | City Lads W | -18% | 0.20 | 0.29 |
| 12 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 13 | Diepkloof W | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| 14 | TS Galaxy W | -25% | 0.50 | 0.83 |
| 15 | JVW FC W | -32% | 0.86 | 1.67 |
| 16 | Stellenbosch W | -62% | 0.17 | 0.71 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Richmond United W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super League Women (South-Africa), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Stellenbosch W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.17/match at home against 0.71 away (-62%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Fort Hare W | +100% | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| 2 | University of Johannesburg W | +27% | 0.29 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Ramatlaohle W | +25% | 0.50 | 0.83 |
| 4 | Diepkloof W | +11% | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| 5 | UWC W | +8% | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| 6 | Copperbelt Ladies W | +2% | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| 7 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | Ezemvelo W | 0% | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| 9 | City Lads W | -4% | 1.40 | 1.29 |
| 10 | Tshwane University W | -8% | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| 11 | Stellenbosch W | -17% | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | Pretoria U. W | -19% | 0.83 | 0.57 |
| 13 | TS Galaxy W | -25% | 0.83 | 0.50 |
| 14 | Richmond United W | -34% | 1.17 | 0.57 |
| 15 | JVW FC W | -62% | 0.71 | 0.17 |
| 16 | First Touch W | -70% | 1.14 | 0.20 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, University of Fort Hare W has the best home defensive record in the Super League Women (South-Africa), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.83 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. First Touch W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.14/match at home versus 0.20 away (-70%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Touch W | +100% | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| 2 | City Lads W | +62% | 0.60 | 0.14 |
| 3 | JVW FC W | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 4 | Copperbelt Ladies W | +48% | 0.57 | 0.20 |
| 5 | Richmond United W | +40% | 0.67 | 0.29 |
| 6 | Diepkloof W | +33% | 0.33 | 0.17 |
| 7 | Ramatlaohle W | +33% | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| 8 | Pretoria U. W | +27% | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 9 | Stellenbosch W | +27% | 0.50 | 0.29 |
| 10 | University of Fort Hare W | +9% | 0.60 | 0.50 |
| 11 | Tshwane University W | +8% | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| 12 | UWC W | +1% | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| 13 | TS Galaxy W | -11% | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| 14 | University of Johannesburg W | -17% | 0.71 | 1.00 |
| 15 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | -21% | 1.83 | 2.83 |
| 16 | Ezemvelo W | -33% | 0.17 | 0.33 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, First Touch W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Super League Women (South-Africa), netting 0.14 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Ezemvelo W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.17/match at home against 0.33 away (-33%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tshwane University W | +67% | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| 2 | Ramatlaohle W | +43% | 0.33 | 0.83 |
| 3 | University of Johannesburg W | +40% | 0.29 | 0.67 |
| 4 | Diepkloof W | +27% | 0.67 | 1.17 |
| 5 | Pretoria U. W | +13% | 0.33 | 0.43 |
| 6 | Richmond United W | +7% | 1.50 | 1.71 |
| 7 | Copperbelt Ladies W | +6% | 0.71 | 0.80 |
| 8 | Mamelodi Sundowns W | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | City Lads W | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Ezemvelo W | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 11 | Stellenbosch W | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 12 | University of Fort Hare W | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 13 | JVW FC W | -7% | 0.57 | 0.50 |
| 14 | UWC W | -12% | 0.43 | 0.33 |
| 15 | TS Galaxy W | -23% | 1.33 | 0.83 |
| 16 | First Touch W | -48% | 0.57 | 0.20 |
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Tshwane University W has the best home defensive record in the Super League Women (South-Africa), conceding just 0.17 goals/match at home compared to 0.86 away — a Defence Advantage of +67%. First Touch W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.57/match at home versus 0.20 away (-48%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — South-Africa
- 1st Division Home Advantage— Division Underground
- 8 Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Diski Challenge Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Diski Shield Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Premier Soccer League Home Advantage— Division Pro