CONCACAF Champions League — 2nd Half Table
World · 2026
Overall / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 6-1-1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 19 | LWWWW | 2.38 | 63% | 25% | 13% | 100% | 50% | 25% | 1.88 | |
| 2 | 8 | 4-3-1 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 15 | LDWDW | 1.88 | 88% | 0% | 50% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 1.00 | |
| 3 | 8 | 4-2-2 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 14 | WDLWW | 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 1.88 | |
| 4 | 6 | 4-0-2 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 12 | LLWWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 17% | 1.50 | |
| 5 | 6 | 3-2-1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 11 | LDWWD | 1.83 | 67% | 17% | 33% | 83% | 67% | 17% | 1.83 | |
| 6 | 4 | 3-1-0 | 8 | 0 | +8 | 10 | WDWW | 2.50 | 100% | 0% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 7 | 6 | 3-1-2 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 10 | WLWDW | 1.67 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 3.17 | |
| 8 | 4 | 3-0-1 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 9 | LWWW | 2.25 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.25 | |
| 9 | 4 | 3-0-1 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 9 | WLWW | 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 10 | 4 | 2-0-2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 6 | LWLW | 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | 75% | 75% | 2.75 | |
| 11 | 4 | 1-1-2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 | LLWD | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 12 | 4 | 1-1-2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 | LLWD | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 13 | 6 | 0-4-2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 4 | LDLDD | 0.67 | 50% | 17% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0.67 | |
| 14 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 15 | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 16 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 17 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 18 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 19 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 20 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 21 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 22 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 23 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 24 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 25 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 26 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 27 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.50 |
CONCACAF Champions League 2026 — 2nd Half Table
Los Angeles FC leads the CONCACAF Champions League second half table overall with 19 points from 8 games (6W-1D-1L), averaging 1.88 goals per game.
Nashville SC follows in second place with 15 points. The league average at second half overall is 1.87 goals per game, with Defence Force recording the highest average at 3.50.
Home / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4-0-0 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 12 | WWWW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 2.75 | |
| 2 | 4 | 4-0-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 12 | WWWW | 3.00 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 100% | 25% | 25% | 1.50 | |
| 3 | 3 | 2-1-0 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.67 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2-0-0 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 5 | 2 | 2-0-0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 6 | 2 | 2-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 7 | 3 | 2-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | |
| 8 | 4 | 1-3-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | DDDW | 1.50 | 100% | 0% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0.75 | |
| 9 | 2 | 1-1-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 10 | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 | |
| 11 | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 12 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 15 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 16 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 17 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 18 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 19 | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 | |
| 20 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 21 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 22 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 23 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 24 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 25 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 26 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 27 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
CONCACAF Champions League 2026 — Home 2nd Half Table
Tigres UANL leads the CONCACAF Champions League second half table at home with 12 points from 4 games (4W-0D-0L), averaging 2.75 goals per game.
Los Angeles FC follows in second place with 12 points. The league average at second half at home is 1.77 goals per game, with Toluca recording the highest average at 3.67.
Away / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 3-0-1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 9 | LWWW | 2.25 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 100% | 25% | 0% | 1.25 | |
| 2 | 3 | 2-1-0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.33 | |
| 3 | 4 | 2-1-1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 | LWWD | 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% | 75% | 25% | 2.25 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 5 | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 | |
| 6 | 3 | 1-0-2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 2.67 | |
| 7 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 8 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 9 | 3 | 0-3-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | DDD | 1.00 | 67% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0.67 | |
| 10 | 4 | 0-2-2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 2 | DLLD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 11 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 15 | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 16 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 17 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 18 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 19 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 20 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 21 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 22 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 23 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 24 | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 25 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 26 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 27 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
CONCACAF Champions League 2026 — Away 2nd Half Table
Nashville SC leads the CONCACAF Champions League second half table away with 9 points from 4 games (3W-0D-1L), averaging 1.25 goals per game.
Los Angeles Galaxy follows in second place with 7 points. The league average at second half away is 1.96 goals per game, with Universidad O&M recording the highest average at 5.00.