National Division — Form Table
Luxembourg · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 2 | +19 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 71% | 0% | 29% | 3.00 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 | +11 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 71% | 0% | 29% | 1.86 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 9 | +13 | 15 | LWWLWWW | 2.14 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 3.14 | 86% | 86% | 4.43 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 15 | WWWWLLW | 2.14 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.71 | 86% | 86% | 2.86 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 13 | WLLWWDW | 1.86 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 12 | WLDWWDD | 1.71 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 2.43 | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 12 | WLWLWWL | 1.71 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.86 | 100% | 100% | 3.71 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 11 | WWLWDDL | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 1.43 | 86% | 14% | 2.29 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 10 | LWLLWWD | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.29 | 100% | 100% | 4.14 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 10 | LWWLDLW | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.57 | 71% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 8 | LWDLLDW | 1.14 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.71 | 100% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 7 | LLWWLDL | 1.00 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.00 | 86% | 71% | 4.43 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 4 | LLLWLDL | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 23 | -15 | 3 | WLLLLLL | 0.43 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.14 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 21 | -15 | 0 | LLLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 0.86 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 25 | -25 | 0 | LLLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
FC Differdange 03 leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
UNA Strassen is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
UN Kaerjeng 97 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Swift Hesperange is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Wiltz is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
US Rumelange has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.43 PPG.
- •The National Division (Luxembourg) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the National Division in this period is 45%
- •Teams score an average of 1.72 goals per game and concede 1.72 — a combined 3.45 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 50% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 27% of games.
National Division (Luxembourg) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
FC Differdange 03, UNA Strassen and UN Kaerjeng 97 have been the standout performers in the National Division (Luxembourg) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 2.14 PPG respectively. Across the National Division, teams score an average of 1.72 goals and concede 1.72 per game — a combined 3.45 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 50% of fixtures while 27% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Swift Hesperange and Wiltz have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the National Division.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | +18 | 18 | WWWWWW | 3.00 | 83% | 0% | 17% | 3.17 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 5 | +15 | 12 | WLWWW | 2.40 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 12 | WWWW | 3.00 | 75% | 0% | 25% | 2.25 | 75% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 6 | +13 | 11 | WWDWD | 2.20 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 3.80 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 1.75 | 75% | 75% | 3.00 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 | WLWD | 1.75 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 1.25 | 50% | 50% | 1.75 | ||
| 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 | WLLW | 1.50 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.75 | 100% | 75% | 3.75 | ||
| 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 | WLLLW | 1.20 | 0% | 40% | 60% | 1.20 | 80% | 80% | 3.00 | ||
| 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 6 | WWLLL | 1.20 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 1.40 | 80% | 80% | 4.40 | ||
| 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | WLDDL | 1.00 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 1.20 | 80% | 20% | 2.40 | ||
| 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 4 | LWLD | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 1.75 | 100% | 50% | 3.25 | ||
| 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.00 | 100% | 67% | 4.00 | ||
| 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 3 | LWLL | 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 1.50 | 100% | 75% | 4.25 | ||
| 14 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 1 | DLLLL | 0.20 | 0% | 20% | 80% | 0.80 | 100% | 60% | 2.60 | ||
| 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 | LLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 0.25 | 50% | 50% | 2.75 | ||
| 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 18 | -16 | 0 | LLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 80% | 20% | 0.40 | 100% | 80% | 4.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
FC Differdange 03 leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
UNA Strassen is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
UN Kaerjeng 97 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 80% and 2.40 PPG.
Swift Hesperange is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Etzella Ettelbruck is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Wiltz has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.20 PPG.
- •The National Division (Luxembourg) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the National Division in this period is 44%
- •Teams score an average of 1.82 goals per game and concede 1.64 — a combined 3.46 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 50% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 28% of games.
National Division (Luxembourg) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
FC Differdange 03, UNA Strassen and UN Kaerjeng 97 have been the standout performers in the National Division (Luxembourg) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 2.40 PPG respectively. Across the National Division, teams score an average of 1.82 goals and concede 1.64 per game — a combined 3.46 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 50% of fixtures while 28% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Swift Hesperange and Etzella Ettelbruck have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the National Division.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 15 | WWWWW | 3.00 | 80% | 0% | 20% | 2.00 | 80% | 40% | 2.20 | ||
| 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 12 | WWLWW | 2.40 | 60% | 0% | 40% | 2.00 | 80% | 60% | 2.60 | ||
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 12 | WWWLW | 2.40 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.20 | 100% | 100% | 3.60 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 10 | WWLWD | 2.00 | 40% | 0% | 60% | 2.60 | 100% | 80% | 3.60 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.25 | ||
| 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | LLWDW | 1.40 | 20% | 60% | 40% | 1.00 | 60% | 40% | 2.00 | ||
| 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 | WLWD | 1.75 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | ||
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.00 | 100% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 6 | LLWW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.75 | ||
| 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 6 | LWLW | 1.50 | 25% | 0% | 75% | 1.75 | 75% | 75% | 4.50 | ||
| 11 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 | DLWLD | 1.00 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 1.20 | 80% | 40% | 2.80 | ||
| 12 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 | LLWLDL | 0.67 | 0% | 17% | 83% | 1.50 | 83% | 67% | 4.00 | ||
| 13 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 | LLDLW | 0.80 | 20% | 40% | 40% | 1.40 | 100% | 100% | 4.20 | ||
| 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 3 | WLLL | 0.75 | 0% | 25% | 75% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 6.25 | ||
| 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 0 | LLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 75% | 25% | 0.50 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 15 | -15 | 0 | LLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 75% | 75% | 3.75 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
UNA Strassen leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Progres Niederkorn is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 80% and 2.40 PPG.
US Mondorf-les-bains is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 80% and 2.40 PPG.
Swift Hesperange is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
US Rumelange is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
AS Jeunesse Esch has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 17% wins and only 0.67 PPG.
- •The National Division (Luxembourg) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the National Division in this period is 46%
- •Teams score an average of 1.64 goals per game and concede 1.82 — a combined 3.46 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 50% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 25% of games.
National Division (Luxembourg) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
UNA Strassen, Progres Niederkorn and US Mondorf-les-bains have been the standout performers in the National Division (Luxembourg) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.40 and 2.40 PPG respectively. Across the National Division, teams score an average of 1.64 goals and concede 1.82 per game — a combined 3.46 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 50% of fixtures while 25% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Swift Hesperange and US Rumelange have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the National Division.
Form Tables — Luxembourg
- Cup Form Table— Division Pro