FA Cup — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
South-Korea · 2026
Under 2.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 2.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 0% | 75% | |
| 15 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 16 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 18 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% | |
| 19 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 67% | |
| 20 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 2.5 Insights
League average
33%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dangjin Citizen lead the FA Cup with a 75% Under 2.5 rate — 3 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 75%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 52%, putting Dangjin Citizen ahead of the rest.
Busan I Park and Seongnam FC rank second and third respectively. Busan I Park recorded a 67% rate across 3 matches (2 stayed below), while Seongnam FC stand at 67% from 3 outings (2 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Asan Mugunghwa record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 2.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 52%, the FA Cup shows a moderate lean toward compact scoreboards. The top three clubs average 70%, sitting 18 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dangjin Citizen's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 75% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 0.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 0.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 6 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 0.5 Insights
League average
4%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Busan I Park lead the FA Cup with a 33% Under 0.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 33% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 6%, putting Busan I Park ahead of the rest.
Seongnam FC and Asan Mugunghwa rank second and third respectively. Seongnam FC recorded a 33% rate across 3 matches (1 stayed below), while Asan Mugunghwa stand at 0% from 3 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yeoju Sejong record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 0.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 6%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 22%, sitting 16 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Busan I Park's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 1.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 1.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% | |
| 9 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 14 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 15 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
| 16 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 25% | |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 1.5 Insights
League average
18%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Seongnam FC lead the FA Cup with a 67% Under 1.5 rate — 2 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 30%, putting Seongnam FC ahead of the rest.
Yeoju Sejong and Ulsan Citizen rank second and third respectively. Yeoju Sejong recorded a 67% rate across 3 matches (2 stayed below), while Ulsan Citizen stand at 50% from 4 outings (2 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Jinju Citizen record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 1.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 30%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 61%, sitting 31 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Seongnam FC's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 67% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 3.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 3.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 31 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 0% | 75% | |
| 32 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 33 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 75% | 0% | |
| 34 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 35 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% | |
| 36 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 37 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 45 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 49 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 3.5 Insights
League average
64%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Busan Transportation lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 3.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 79%, putting Busan Transportation ahead of the rest.
Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam FC rank second and third respectively. Gimpo Citizen recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Seongnam FC stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Asan Mugunghwa record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the FA Cup at 33% — only 1 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 50% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 3.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 79%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 21 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Busan Transportation's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 4.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 4.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 46 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 75% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 52 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 55 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 57 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 58 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 4.5 Insights
League average
80%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dangjin Citizen lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 4.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 91%, putting Dangjin Citizen ahead of the rest.
Jinju Citizen and Busan I Park rank second and third respectively. Jinju Citizen recorded a 100% rate across 4 matches (4 stayed below), while Busan I Park stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Asan Mugunghwa record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the FA Cup at 33% — only 1 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 50% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 4.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 91%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 9 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dangjin Citizen's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 5.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 5.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 49 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 50 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 51 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 53 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 75% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 55 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 59 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 5.5 Insights
League average
87%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dangjin Citizen lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 5.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 0% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 94%, putting Dangjin Citizen ahead of the rest.
Jinju Citizen and Busan I Park rank second and third respectively. Jinju Citizen recorded a 100% rate across 4 matches (4 stayed below), while Busan I Park stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Asan Mugunghwa record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the FA Cup at 67% — only 2 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 100% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 5.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 94%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 6 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dangjin Citizen's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.