FA Cup — Away Advantage
Thailand · 2025/26
Away Performance Overview
1. Away PPG: Points earned per away match — the primary indicator of a team's strength as a visitor.
2. Away Scored / match: Goals scored per away match. A high figure means the team creates and converts chances consistently on the road.
3. Away Conceded / match: Goals conceded per away match. A low figure means the team is difficult to break down even outside their own ground.
Home figures are shown alongside for context, helping identify whether the team's away form is better, equal or worse than at home.
Away Goals Scored
| # | Team | Away Scored / match | Home Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.00 | 6.75 | |
| 2 | 4.50 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | 4.00 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | 3.50 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 3.00 | 9.50 | |
| 6 | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | 2.67 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | 2.67 | 2.00 | |
| 9 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | 1.67 | 2.00 | |
| 13 | 1.67 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 18 | 0.50 | 5.00 | |
| 19 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 20 | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 21 | 0.00 | 7.00 | |
| 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 23 | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 26 | 0.00 | 2.75 | |
| 27 | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 36 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 37 | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 41 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Best Away Attack Analysis
Prachuap leads the FA Cup (Thailand) in away goal scoring, netting 2.67 goals per match on the road — compared to 1.00 at home. The league average away scoring rate is 2.13 goals/match. At the opposite end, Nakhon Pathom is the least threatening visitor, managing just 1.67 goals/match away from home. Teams that score consistently in away fixtures are often undervalued by bookmakers and represent strong opportunities in Asian Handicap and Away Win markets.
Away Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Away Conceded / match | Home Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 5 | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 17 | 1.25 | 0.00 | |
| 18 | 1.33 | 0.00 | |
| 19 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 20 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 21 | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 22 | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 23 | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 24 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 25 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 26 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 27 | 2.33 | 0.00 | |
| 28 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 29 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 30 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 31 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 32 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 33 | 4.00 | 0.00 | |
| 34 | 4.00 | 0.00 | |
| 35 | 5.00 | 0.00 | |
| 36 | 5.00 | 0.00 | |
| 37 | 6.00 | 0.00 | |
| 38 | 6.00 | 0.00 | |
| 39 | 7.00 | 0.00 | |
| 40 | 10.00 | 0.00 | |
| 41 | 12.00 | 0.00 | |
| 42 | 19.00 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Best Away Defence Analysis
Prachuap has the best away defensive record in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.67 goals/match on the road — compared to 0.00 at home. The league average away goals conceded is 1.25/match. At the other end, Khon Kaen United is the most porous visitor, leaking 2.33 goals/match away. Teams with strong away defensive records are key signals for Under 2.5, BTTS No, and Clean Sheet markets when playing away from home.
1st Half — Away Goals Scored
| # | Team | Away Scored / match | Home Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 1.50 | 3.00 | |
| 3 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 1.25 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | 0.50 | 3.00 | |
| 10 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Away Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Ubonkids City is the most productive away team in the FA Cup (Thailand), scoring 3.00 goals/match on the road — league average is 0.92. Uttaradit struggles most in this period away from home with just 0.00 goals/match. First-half away scoring is a strong indicator for Asian Handicap and Half-Time Result markets when betting on visiting sides.
1st Half — Away Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Away Conceded / match | Home Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 1.33 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Away Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Nakhon Ratchasima FC has the tightest away defence in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match on the road — league average is 0.73. Ubonkids City concedes most in this period away from home with 2.00 goals/match. Teams conceding few goals in the first half away from home are strong signals for Half-Time Under 0.5 and HT 0-0 markets.
2nd Half — Away Goals Scored
| # | Team | Away Scored / match | Home Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | 1.50 | 6.50 | |
| 5 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Away Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Nong Bua Pitchaya is the most productive away team in the FA Cup (Thailand), scoring 2.00 goals/match on the road — league average is 0.95. Pattani struggles most in this period away from home with just 0.00 goals/match. Second-half away scoring patterns are key for live betting and Over/Under markets in the closing stages of a match.
2nd Half — Away Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Away Conceded / match | Home Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 12 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 13 | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 4.00 | 0.00 |
FA Cup (Thailand) — Away Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Police Tero has the tightest away defence in the FA Cup (Thailand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match on the road — league average is 0.93. Ubonkids City concedes most in this period away from home with 4.00 goals/match. A tight away defence in the second half is a key indicator for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet markets in the closing stages.
Away Advantage Tables — Thailand
- League Cup Away Advantage— Division Pro
- Thai Champions Cup Away Advantage— Division Underground
- Thai League 1 Away Advantage— Division Pro
- Thai League 2 Away Advantage— Division Pro