1 Lyga — Home Advantage
Lithuania · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Garliava | +24% | +32% | +15% | 1.25/0.64 |
| 2 |  Kauno Žalgiris II | +21% | +26% | +15% | 1.25/0.36 |
| 3 |  Jonava | +21% | +8% | +33% | 1.27/1.00 |
| 4 |  Tauras | +20% | +30% | +10% | 2.08/1.25 |
| 5 |  Dainava | +20% | +21% | +19% | 1.80/0.88 |
| 6 |  Babrungas | +18% | +10% | +27% | 2.67/2.17 |
| 7 |  Hegelmann II | +18% | +20% | +16% | 1.25/0.58 |
| 8 |  Žalgiris II | +18% | +26% | +10% | 2.17/1.42 |
| 9 |  Transinvest 2 | +18% | +14% | +21% | 1.00/0.75 |
| 10 |  FA Šiauliai II | +16% | +14% | +19% | 0.75/0.42 |
| 11 |  BFA | +14% | +5% | +24% | 2.08/1.42 |
| 12 |  Minija | +4% | +5% | +4% | 3.00/2.38 |
| 13 |  Be1 NFA | +3% | +11% | -5% | 2.40/1.77 |
| 14 |  Ekranas | 0% | +4% | -4% | 0.83/0.33 |
| 15 |  Atmosfera | -1% | -12% | +9% | 1.36/1.42 |
| 16 |  Neptūną Klaipėda | -4% | +12% | -21% | 2.00/1.67 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), the average home win rate is 52% compared to 33% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Dainava shows the strongest home advantage, winning 53% of home games versus just 13% away (a difference of +41%). At the other end, Atmosfera actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 36% versus 42% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garliava | +32% | 1.42 | 0.73 |
| 2 | Tauras | +30% | 2.17 | 1.17 |
| 3 | Žalgiris II | +26% | 2.00 | 1.17 |
| 4 | Kauno Žalgiris II | +26% | 1.08 | 0.64 |
| 5 | Dainava | +21% | 1.53 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Hegelmann II | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| 7 | FA Šiauliai II | +14% | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 8 | Transinvest 2 | +14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Neptūną Klaipėda | +12% | 1.50 | 1.17 |
| 10 | Be1 NFA | +11% | 2.00 | 1.62 |
| 11 | Babrungas | +10% | 1.92 | 1.58 |
| 12 | Jonava | +8% | 1.18 | 1.00 |
| 13 | BFA | +5% | 1.67 | 1.50 |
| 14 | Minija | +5% | 2.80 | 2.54 |
| 15 | Ekranas | +4% | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| 16 | Atmosfera | -12% | 1.45 | 1.83 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Garliava has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.42 goals/match at home versus 0.73 away — a Scoring Advantage of +32%. In contrast, Atmosfera scores more away (1.83/match) than at home (1.45/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -12% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonava | +33% | 0.82 | 1.62 |
| 2 | Babrungas | +27% | 0.33 | 0.58 |
| 3 | BFA | +24% | 1.08 | 1.75 |
| 4 | Transinvest 2 | +21% | 1.83 | 2.83 |
| 5 | Dainava | +19% | 0.93 | 1.38 |
| 6 | FA Šiauliai II | +19% | 1.83 | 2.67 |
| 7 | Hegelmann II | +16% | 1.92 | 2.67 |
| 8 | Kauno Žalgiris II | +15% | 1.33 | 1.82 |
| 9 | Garliava | +15% | 1.00 | 1.36 |
| 10 | Tauras | +10% | 1.08 | 1.33 |
| 11 | Žalgiris II | +10% | 1.17 | 1.42 |
| 12 | Atmosfera | +9% | 1.18 | 1.42 |
| 13 | Minija | +4% | 0.50 | 0.54 |
| 14 | Ekranas | -4% | 2.25 | 2.08 |
| 15 | Be1 NFA | -5% | 1.10 | 1.00 |
| 16 | Neptūną Klaipėda | -21% | 1.42 | 0.92 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence Analysis
Jonava has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.82 goals/match at home compared to 1.62 away — a Defence Advantage of +33%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Neptūną Klaipėda concedes more at home (1.42/match) than away (0.92/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tauras | +54% | 0.83 | 0.25 |
| 2 | Garliava | +42% | 0.67 | 0.27 |
| 3 | Žalgiris II | +41% | 1.00 | 0.42 |
| 4 | Dainava | +32% | 0.73 | 0.38 |
| 5 | Be1 NFA | +30% | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| 6 | Jonava | +16% | 0.64 | 0.46 |
| 7 | Transinvest 2 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 8 | Minija | +13% | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 9 | Ekranas | +9% | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| 10 | FA Šiauliai II | +9% | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| 11 | Hegelmann II | +9% | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| 12 | BFA | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 13 | Babrungas | -11% | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| 14 | Neptūną Klaipėda | -12% | 0.58 | 0.75 |
| 15 | Atmosfera | -34% | 0.45 | 0.92 |
| 16 | Kauno Žalgiris II | -100% | 0.00 | 0.36 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Tauras has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 0.83 goals/match at home versus 0.25 away — a Scoring Advantage of +54%. At the other end, Kauno Žalgiris II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.36 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFA | +71% | 0.08 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Minija | +51% | 0.10 | 0.31 |
| 3 | Transinvest 2 | +48% | 0.50 | 1.42 |
| 4 | FA Šiauliai II | +33% | 0.58 | 1.17 |
| 5 | Babrungas | +25% | 0.25 | 0.42 |
| 6 | Atmosfera | +25% | 0.45 | 0.75 |
| 7 | Be1 NFA | +12% | 0.30 | 0.38 |
| 8 | Kauno Žalgiris II | +10% | 0.67 | 0.82 |
| 9 | Jonava | +9% | 0.64 | 0.77 |
| 10 | Hegelmann II | +7% | 1.08 | 1.25 |
| 11 | Žalgiris II | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 12 | Ekranas | -5% | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| 13 | Tauras | -17% | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| 14 | Garliava | -39% | 0.83 | 0.36 |
| 15 | Neptūną Klaipėda | -40% | 0.58 | 0.25 |
| 16 | Dainava | -52% | 0.40 | 0.13 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, BFA has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.08 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +71%. Dainava struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.40/match at home versus 0.13 away (-52%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kauno Žalgiris II | +60% | 1.08 | 0.27 |
| 2 | Neptūną Klaipėda | +38% | 0.92 | 0.42 |
| 3 | Hegelmann II | +26% | 1.00 | 0.58 |
| 4 | Babrungas | +25% | 1.25 | 0.75 |
| 5 | Garliava | +25% | 0.75 | 0.45 |
| 6 | FA Šiauliai II | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 |
| 7 | Tauras | +19% | 1.33 | 0.92 |
| 8 | Žalgiris II | +14% | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 9 | Transinvest 2 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Dainava | +12% | 0.80 | 0.63 |
| 11 | BFA | +9% | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| 12 | Atmosfera | +4% | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| 13 | Minija | +1% | 1.80 | 1.77 |
| 14 | Jonava | +1% | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| 15 | Ekranas | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 16 | Be1 NFA | -4% | 1.00 | 1.08 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Kauno Žalgiris II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.08 goals/match at home versus 0.27 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. At the other end, Be1 NFA shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 1.08 away (-4%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garliava | +71% | 0.17 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Jonava | +65% | 0.18 | 0.85 |
| 3 | Dainava | +40% | 0.53 | 1.25 |
| 4 | Babrungas | +33% | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| 5 | Tauras | +29% | 0.50 | 0.92 |
| 6 | Hegelmann II | +26% | 0.83 | 1.42 |
| 7 | Kauno Žalgiris II | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Žalgiris II | +16% | 0.67 | 0.92 |
| 9 | BFA | +11% | 1.00 | 1.25 |
| 10 | FA Šiauliai II | +9% | 1.25 | 1.50 |
| 11 | Transinvest 2 | +3% | 1.33 | 1.42 |
| 12 | Ekranas | -3% | 1.42 | 1.33 |
| 13 | Atmosfera | -4% | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| 14 | Neptūną Klaipėda | -11% | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| 15 | Be1 NFA | -13% | 0.80 | 0.62 |
| 16 | Minija | -27% | 0.40 | 0.23 |
1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Garliava has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.17 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +71%. Minija struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.40/match at home versus 0.23 away (-27%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Lithuania
- A Lyga Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver