MatchPulse
Ligat Ha'al

Ligat Ha'alxG (Expected Goals)

Israel · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 4 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Maccabi Tel Aviv310.13.353.01.01165+5.9
2Hapoel Tel Aviv47.71.933.70.9384+0.3
3Maccabi Netanya37.02.354.01.3454-2
4Bnei Sakhnin35.41.795.71.9026-3.4
5Maccabi Petah Tikva25.02.523.01.51540
6Hapoel Haifa44.71.187.41.8464+1.3
7Maccabi Haifa34.41.463.41.1295+4.6
8Beitar Jerusalem33.41.126.42.1227-1.4
9Hapoel Beer Sheva33.41.125.71.9077+3.7
10Hapoel Katamon13.03.022.42.3568+3
11Ironi Kiryat Shmona22.71.355.42.69510+2.3
12Hapoel Ramat Gan21.40.685.02.5248+2.7
13Ironi Tiberias11.01.013.43.3533+2
14Hapoel Petah Tikva21.00.511.70.8425+1
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
* xG estimated from shots on goal using the league's average conversion rate. API xG data is not available for this league.
xG Attack Ranking
Maccabi Tel AvivHigh xGF3.35
Hapoel KatamonHigh xGF3.02
Hapoel Ramat GanLow xGF0.68
Ironi TiberiasLow xGF1.01

LEAGUE xG STATS

14 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.67
League avg xGA/g: 1.82
Best overperformer: Maccabi Tel Aviv (+5.9)
Biggest underperformer: Bnei Sakhnin (-3.4)

Ligat Ha'al (Israel) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Ligat Ha'al (Israel) averages 1.79 xG per game this season. Maccabi Tel Aviv creates the most chances with 3.35 xGF per game, while Hapoel Beer Sheva creates the fewest with 1.12 xGF per game. Maccabi Tel Aviv is over-performing their xG (16 goals vs 10.1 xGF) — regression likely. Bnei Sakhnin is under-performing (2 goals vs 5.4 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG)Israel