Hazfi Cup — Form Table
Iran · 2025/26
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.50 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | ||
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | ||
| 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | ||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | ||
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | ||
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | ||
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Foolad FC leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Kheybar Khorramabad is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Esteghlal FC is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Esteghlal Khuzestan is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Chooka Talesh is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Shahrdari Noshahr has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Hazfi Cup (Iran) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 32 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Hazfi Cup in this period is 37%
- •Teams score an average of 1.02 goals per game and concede 1.02 — a combined 2.04 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 35% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 39% of games.
Hazfi Cup (Iran) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Foolad FC, Kheybar Khorramabad and Esteghlal FC have been the standout performers in the Hazfi Cup (Iran) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Hazfi Cup, teams score an average of 1.02 goals and concede 1.02 per game — a combined 2.04 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 35% of fixtures while 39% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Esteghlal Khuzestan and Chooka Talesh have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Hazfi Cup.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Malavan leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Foolad FC is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Paykan is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Esteghlal Khuzestan is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Sepahan FC is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Be'sat Kermanshah has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Hazfi Cup (Iran) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 20 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Hazfi Cup in this period is 48%
- •Teams score an average of 1.17 goals per game and concede 0.87 — a combined 2.04 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 35% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 35% of games.
Hazfi Cup (Iran) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Malavan, Foolad FC and Paykan have been the standout performers in the Hazfi Cup (Iran) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Hazfi Cup, teams score an average of 1.17 goals and concede 0.87 per game — a combined 2.04 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 35% of fixtures while 35% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Esteghlal Khuzestan and Sepahan FC have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Hazfi Cup.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | ||
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | ||
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | ||
| 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | ||
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | ||
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Foolad FC leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Kheybar Khorramabad is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Esteghlal FC is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Chooka Talesh is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Chadormalu SC has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The Hazfi Cup (Iran) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 23 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Hazfi Cup in this period is 26%
- •Teams score an average of 0.87 goals per game and concede 1.17 — a combined 2.04 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 35% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 43% of games.
Hazfi Cup (Iran) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Foolad FC, Kheybar Khorramabad and Esteghlal FC have been the standout performers in the Hazfi Cup (Iran) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the Hazfi Cup, teams score an average of 0.87 goals and concede 1.17 per game — a combined 2.04 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 35% of fixtures while 43% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Mes Shahr-e Babak and Chooka Talesh have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Hazfi Cup.
Form Tables — Iran
- Azadegan League Form Table— Division Pro
- Persian Gulf Pro League Form Table— Division Gold
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Gold