USL W League — Vincere / Perdere all'Intervallo
USA · 2026
USA — USL W League 2026 — Statistiche Dettagliate
Competizione
Più Vittorie:Monterey Bay FC W (100%)
Più Pareggi:Sta Clarita Blue Heat W (100%)
Più Sconfitte:Patuxent W (100%)Media Vittorie:35%Generale / Vincere / Perdere all'Intervallo
| # | Team | MP | V - P - S (PT) | % Vittorie | % Pareggi | % Sconfitte |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monterey Bay FC W | 6 | 6-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |  Capo W | 6 | 5-1-0 | 83% | 17% | 0% |
| 3 |  Pittsburgh Riveters W | 5 | 4-1-0 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| 4 |  Sioux Falls City W | 5 | 4-1-0 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| 5 |  Real Colorado W | 5 | 4-1-0 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| 6 |  Colorado Storm W | 4 | 3-0-1 | 75% | 0% | 25% |
| 7 |  Minnesota Aurora W | 7 | 5-2-0 | 71% | 29% | 0% |
| 8 |  West Seattle Rhodies W | 7 | 5-1-1 | 71% | 14% | 14% |
| 9 |  Snohomish United W | 7 | 5-1-1 | 71% | 14% | 14% |
| 10 |  Charlotte Eagles II W | 6 | 4-2-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 11 |  Racing Louisville W | 6 | 4-1-1 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
| 12 |  NC Courage II W | 6 | 4-1-1 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
| 13 |  Morris Elite W | 6 | 4-1-1 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
| 14 |  Lonestar II W | 6 | 4-1-1 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
| 15 |  Long Island Rough Riders W | 6 | 4-0-2 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 16 |  AHFC Royals W | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 17 |  Lancaster Inferno W | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 18 |  TLH Reckoning W | 5 | 3-1-1 | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 19 |  Carolina Ascent II W | 5 | 3-0-2 | 60% | 0% | 40% |
| 20 |  Dayton Dutch Lions W | 5 | 3-0-2 | 60% | 0% | 40% |
| 21 |  Indy Eleven W | 7 | 4-1-2 | 57% | 14% | 29% |
| 22 |  Edgewater Castle W | 6 | 3-3-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 23 |  Eagle FC W | 6 | 3-3-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 24 |  Salmon Bay W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 25 |  Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 26 |  Oakland Soul W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 27 |  Birmingham Legion W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 28 |  River Light W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 29 |  Flower City 1872 W | 6 | 3-2-1 | 50% | 33% | 17% |
| 30 |  Steel City W | 6 | 3-1-2 | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 31 |  Northern Virginia FC W | 6 | 3-1-2 | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 32 |  Sporting JAX W | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 33 |  California Storm II W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 34 |  Paisley Athletic W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 35 |  Hartford Athletic W | 5 | 2-3-0 | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| 36 |  SSA Royals W | 5 | 2-3-0 | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| 37 |  Brevard Riptide W | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 38 |  Norfolk W | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 39 |  Vermont Green W | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 40 |  San Juan SC W | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 41 |  SoCal Dutch Lions W | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 42 |  Utah United W | 5 | 2-1-2 | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 43 |  SC United Bantams W | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 44 |  Midwest United W | 6 | 2-3-1 | 33% | 50% | 17% |
| 45 |  Kalamazoo FC W | 6 | 2-3-1 | 33% | 50% | 17% |
| 46 |  Richmond Ivy W | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 47 |  New England Mutiny W | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 48 |  Annapolis Blues W | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 49 |  Port City NC W | 6 | 2-1-3 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 50 |  New Jersey Copa W | 6 | 2-1-3 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 51 |  Los Angeles SC W | 6 | 2-1-3 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 52 |  Flatirons II W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 53 |  Loudoun United FC W | 7 | 2-2-3 | 29% | 29% | 43% |
| 54 |  Olympia W | 7 | 2-1-4 | 29% | 14% | 57% |
| 55 |  Wake W | 7 | 2-0-5 | 29% | 0% | 71% |
| 56 |  Miami City W | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 57 |  Lonestar San Antonio W | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 58 |  AMSG W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 59 |  Asheville City W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 60 |  Erie Sports Center W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 61 |  Albion Colorado W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 62 |  Brooke House W | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 63 |  Virginia Development Academy W | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 64 |  Cedar Stars W | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 65 |  Virginia Beach United W | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 66 |  Charlottesville Blues W | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 67 |  Pleasanton Rage W | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 68 |  Portland Cherry Bombs FC W | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 69 |  Cleveland Force W | 5 | 1-1-3 | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 70 |  Colorado ISA W | 5 | 1-0-4 | 20% | 0% | 80% |
| 71 |  Challenge W | 5 | 1-0-4 | 20% | 0% | 80% |
| 72 |  Union Macomb W | 6 | 1-4-1 | 17% | 67% | 17% |
| 73 |  Detroit City W | 6 | 1-4-1 | 17% | 67% | 17% |
| 74 |  Ann Arbor W | 6 | 1-2-3 | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 75 |  Buffalo W | 6 | 1-1-4 | 17% | 17% | 67% |
| 76 |  Rockford Raptors W | 6 | 1-1-4 | 17% | 17% | 67% |
| 77 |  Tacoma Galaxy W | 7 | 1-4-2 | 14% | 57% | 29% |
| 78 |  Chattanooga Red Wolves W | 6 | 0-5-1 | 0% | 83% | 17% |
| 79 |  RKC Third Coast W | 7 | 0-4-3 | 0% | 57% | 43% |
| 80 | Sta Clarita Blue Heat W | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 81 |  Rochester W | 7 | 0-3-4 | 0% | 43% | 57% |
| 82 |  Fort Lauderdale Utd II W | 5 | 0-2-3 | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 83 |  Hill Country Linces W | 6 | 0-2-4 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 84 |  Knoxville W | 5 | 0-2-3 | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 85 |  Rally Madison FC W | 6 | 0-2-4 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 86 |  North Carolina Fusion W | 5 | 0-2-3 | 0% | 40% | 60% |
| 87 |  Stockton Cargo W | 6 | 0-2-4 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 88 |  Miami AC W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 89 |  AC Connecticut W | 6 | 0-1-5 | 0% | 17% | 83% |
| 90 |  Bigfoot W | 7 | 0-1-6 | 0% | 14% | 86% |
| 91 |  Marin FC Siren W | 6 | 0-1-5 | 0% | 17% | 83% |
| 92 |  OC Sporting W | 6 | 0-1-5 | 0% | 17% | 83% |
| 93 | Patuxent W | 6 | 0-0-6 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 94 |  Manhattan W | 5 | 0-0-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 95 |  Toledo Villa W | 6 | 0-0-6 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
USL W League 2026 — Vincere e Perdere all'Intervallo
Monterey Bay FC W guida la USL W League nelle vittorie all'intervallo generale con un tasso di vittoria del 100% (6V-0P-0S su 6 partite). La media della lega è del 35%.
Sta Clarita Blue Heat W pareggia di più all'intervallo (100%), mentre Patuxent W è in svantaggio più spesso alla pausa (100%). Questi schemi sono indicatori chiave per i mercati delle scommesse all'intervallo.
Più Vittorie:Monterey Bay FC W (100%)Più Pareggi:Chattanooga Red Wolves W (100%)Più Sconfitte:Marin FC Siren W (100%)Media Vittorie:36%Casa / Vincere / Perdere all'Intervallo
| # | Team | MP | Casa V - P - S (PT) | Casa % Vittorie | Casa % Pareggi | Casa % Sconfitte |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monterey Bay FC W | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Snohomish United W | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Colorado Storm W | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Birmingham Legion W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Real Colorado W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Racing Louisville W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | NC Courage II W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Long Island Rough Riders W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | California Storm II W | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | Capo W | 5 | 4-1-0 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| 12 | Morris Elite W | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 13 | Lonestar II W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | West Seattle Rhodies W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 15 | Minnesota Aurora W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 16 | Indy Eleven W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 17 | SoCal Dutch Lions W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 18 | AHFC Royals W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 19 | Oakland Soul W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 20 | Sioux Falls City W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 21 | Eagle FC W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 22 | Steel City W | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 23 | Edgewater Castle W | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 24 | SSA Royals W | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 25 | Kalamazoo FC W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 26 | Flower City 1872 W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 27 | Loudoun United FC W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 28 | Paisley Athletic W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 29 | Salmon Bay W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 30 | New Jersey Copa W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 31 | Charlotte Eagles II W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 32 | Lancaster Inferno W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 33 | Northern Virginia FC W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 34 | Utah United W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 35 | Pittsburgh Riveters W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 36 | Vermont Green W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 37 | River Light W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 38 | TLH Reckoning W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 39 | Cedar Stars W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 40 | Carolina Ascent II W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 41 | Dayton Dutch Lions W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 42 | Union Macomb W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 43 | Hartford Athletic W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 44 | Midwest United W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 45 | New England Mutiny W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 46 | Brevard Riptide W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 47 | Pleasanton Rage W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 48 | Virginia Development Academy W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 49 | Los Angeles SC W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 50 | Brooke House W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 51 | Portland Cherry Bombs FC W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 52 | Colorado ISA W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 53 | Erie Sports Center W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 54 | Albion Colorado W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 55 | Miami City W | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 56 | Virginia Beach United W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 57 | Port City NC W | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 58 | Rockford Raptors W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 59 | Olympia W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 60 | Tacoma Galaxy W | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 61 | Chattanooga Red Wolves W | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 62 | Richmond Ivy W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 63 | RKC Third Coast W | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 64 | Detroit City W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 65 | Rochester W | 4 | 0-2-2 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 66 | San Juan SC W | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 67 | Hill Country Linces W | 4 | 0-2-2 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 68 | Buffalo W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 69 | AMSG W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 70 | Fort Lauderdale Utd II W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 71 | Bigfoot W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 72 | Stockton Cargo W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 73 | North Carolina Fusion W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 74 | Rally Madison FC W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 75 | Charlottesville Blues W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 76 | Asheville City W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 77 | Ann Arbor W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 78 | AC Connecticut W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 79 | Sporting JAX W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 80 | Norfolk W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 81 | Knoxville W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 82 | Sta Clarita Blue Heat W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 83 | Marin FC Siren W | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 84 | Challenge W | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 85 | Toledo Villa W | 5 | 0-0-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 86 | Manhattan W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 87 | Annapolis Blues W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 88 | Wake W | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 89 | SC United Bantams W | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 90 | Patuxent W | 4 | 0-0-4 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 91 | Cleveland Force W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 92 | OC Sporting W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
USL W League 2026 — Risultati all'Intervallo in Casa
Monterey Bay FC W guida la USL W League nelle vittorie all'intervallo in casa con un tasso di vittoria del 100% (3V-0P-0S su 3 partite). La media della lega è del 36%.
Chattanooga Red Wolves W pareggia di più all'intervallo (100%), mentre Marin FC Siren W è in svantaggio più spesso alla pausa (100%). Questi schemi sono indicatori chiave per i mercati delle scommesse all'intervallo.
Più Vittorie:Monterey Bay FC W (100%)Più Pareggi:Cedar Stars W (100%)Più Sconfitte:Albion Colorado W (100%)Media Vittorie:32%Trasferta / Vincere / Perdere all'Intervallo
| # | Team | MP | Trasferta V - P - S (PT) | Trasferta % Vittorie | Trasferta % Pareggi | Trasferta % Sconfitte |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monterey Bay FC W | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Riveters W | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | SC United Bantams W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Sioux Falls City W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | San Juan SC W | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Capo W | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Charlotte Eagles II W | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 8 | Minnesota Aurora W | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 | West Seattle Rhodies W | 4 | 3-0-1 | 75% | 0% | 25% |
| 10 | Real Colorado W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 11 | Lancaster Inferno W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 12 | TLH Reckoning W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 13 | Norfolk W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | Sporting JAX W | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 15 | Lonestar II W | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 16 | Carolina Ascent II W | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 17 | Dayton Dutch Lions W | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | River Light W | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 | Annapolis Blues W | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 20 | Snohomish United W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 21 | NC Courage II W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 22 | Racing Louisville W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 23 | Salmon Bay W | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 24 | Wake W | 4 | 2-0-2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 25 | Richmond Ivy W | 4 | 2-0-2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 | Northern Virginia FC W | 4 | 2-0-2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 27 | Indy Eleven W | 4 | 2-0-2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 28 | Long Island Rough Riders W | 4 | 2-0-2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 29 | Charlottesville Blues W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 30 | Hartford Athletic W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 31 | Edgewater Castle W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 32 | AHFC Royals W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 33 | Brevard Riptide W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 34 | Flower City 1872 W | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 35 | Morris Elite W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 36 | Port City NC W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 37 | Challenge W | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 38 | Vermont Green W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 39 | Eagle FC W | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 40 | Steel City W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 41 | California Storm II W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 42 | Oakland Soul W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 43 | Olympia W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 44 | Ann Arbor W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 45 | Asheville City W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 46 | Cleveland Force W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 47 | Midwest United W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 48 | AMSG W | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 49 | Flatirons II W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 50 | Utah United W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 51 | New England Mutiny W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 52 | Los Angeles SC W | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 53 | Lonestar San Antonio W | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 54 | Detroit City W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 55 | Hudson Valley Crusaders W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 56 | Birmingham Legion W | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 57 | Buffalo W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 58 | New Jersey Copa W | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 59 | Cedar Stars W | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 60 | Kalamazoo FC W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 61 | RKC Third Coast W | 4 | 0-2-2 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 62 | Union Macomb W | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 63 | Sta Clarita Blue Heat W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 64 | Virginia Development Academy W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 65 | Chattanooga Red Wolves W | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 66 | Brooke House W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 67 | Portland Cherry Bombs FC W | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 68 | Pleasanton Rage W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 69 | North Carolina Fusion W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 70 | Miami AC W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 71 | Fort Lauderdale Utd II W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 72 | Knoxville W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 73 | Tacoma Galaxy W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 74 | Stockton Cargo W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 75 | SSA Royals W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 76 | Virginia Beach United W | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 77 | SoCal Dutch Lions W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 78 | OC Sporting W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 79 | Loudoun United FC W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 80 | Rochester W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 81 | Rally Madison FC W | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 82 | Marin FC Siren W | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 83 | Rockford Raptors W | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 84 | Albion Colorado W | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 85 | Colorado ISA W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 86 | Erie Sports Center W | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 87 | Manhattan W | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 88 | Toledo Villa W | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 89 | Patuxent W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 90 | AC Connecticut W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 91 | Hill Country Linces W | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 92 | Bigfoot W | 4 | 0-0-4 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 93 | Colorado Storm W | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
USL W League 2026 — Risultati all'Intervallo in Trasferta
Monterey Bay FC W guida la USL W League nelle vittorie all'intervallo in trasferta con un tasso di vittoria del 100% (3V-0P-0S su 3 partite). La media della lega è del 32%.
Cedar Stars W pareggia di più all'intervallo (100%), mentre Albion Colorado W è in svantaggio più spesso alla pausa (100%). Questi schemi sono indicatori chiave per i mercati delle scommesse all'intervallo.