MatchPulse
League Cup

League Cup — xG (Erwartete Tore)

England · 2026/27

Erwartete Tore (xG)

xG-Daten verfügbar für 3 Spiele
#TeamSpxGFxGF/SxGAxGA/SGTGGDiff
1Barnsley38.82.948.22.7276-1.8
2Bradford37.72.583.81.2851-2.7
3Peterborough37.22.397.82.6194+1.8
4West Ham36.22.074.61.5395+2.8
5Tottenham25.52.782.91.4764+0.5
6Watford25.22.614.22.1225-3.2
7Everton25.22.611.00.4950-0.2
8Brentford25.22.611.60.8282+2.8
9Middlesbrough34.91.633.91.3044-0.9
10Chelsea24.92.452.31.1583+3.1
11Lincoln34.61.534.91.6366+1.4
12Sheffield Utd34.31.423.91.3052+0.8
13Charlton24.32.134.22.1246-0.2
14Fulham24.22.121.60.8262+1.8
15Newcastle24.22.121.60.8242-0.2
16West Brom24.22.122.91.4764+1.8
17Reading34.21.414.61.5253+0.8
18Leyton Orient33.91.314.91.6333-0.9
19Ipswich23.91.964.92.4555+1.1
20Leicester23.91.963.61.8023-1.9
21Luton23.91.962.91.4732-0.9
22Blackburn23.91.963.61.8033-0.9
23Wolves33.91.303.91.3151+1.1
24Plymouth23.61.801.60.8244+0.4
25Crewe23.61.803.61.8044+0.4
26Leeds23.61.803.61.8056+1.4
27Fleetwood Town33.31.093.00.9860+2.7
28Norwich33.31.094.61.5267+2.7
29Coventry23.31.634.62.2955+1.7
30Burnley23.21.592.21.1011-2.2
31Bristol City12.92.941.61.6301-2.9
32Southampton22.91.474.22.1234+0.1
33Aston Villa12.92.941.61.6331+0.1
34Walsall22.91.474.62.2910-1.9
35Stockport County12.62.610.30.3311-1.6
36Bournemouth12.62.610.30.3340+1.4
37Millwall32.60.873.31.0922-0.6
38Wigan12.62.611.31.3111-1.6
39Crawley Town22.61.314.22.1221-0.6
40Grimsby12.62.611.31.3113-1.6
41Stevenage22.61.312.61.3124-0.6
42Cambridge United22.61.313.31.6422-0.6
43Cardiff22.31.151.30.6644+1.7
44Blackpool22.31.155.52.7845+1.7
45Shrewsbury22.31.152.61.3115-1.3
46AFC Wimbledon22.31.143.61.8014-1.3
47Hull City22.21.122.21.0912-1.2
48Manchester City12.01.960.00.0050+3
49Doncaster22.00.985.22.61240
50Arsenal12.01.961.00.9842+2
51Sheffield Wednesday22.00.981.30.6612-1
52Tranmere12.01.960.70.65220
53Barnet12.01.962.32.2812-1
54Burton Albion12.01.962.32.2812-1
55Stoke City21.90.933.51.7731+1.2
56Brighton11.61.631.31.3132+1.4
57Crystal Palace11.61.631.31.3130+1.4
58Milton Keynes Dons11.61.632.32.2814-0.6
59Oldham11.61.631.00.9802-1.6
60Colchester11.61.631.61.6302-1.6
61Salford City11.61.631.00.9811-0.6
62Liverpool11.61.632.01.9631+1.4
63Preston21.30.663.91.9615-0.3
64Derby11.31.311.31.3112-0.3
65Portsmouth11.31.312.62.6113-0.3
66Sunderland11.31.310.30.3310-0.3
67Bristol Rovers11.31.311.00.9801-1.3
68Newport County11.31.311.61.6311-0.3
69Manchester United11.31.311.61.6323+0.7
70Rochdale21.30.655.22.6124+0.7
71Birmingham21.00.493.31.6326+1
72Wycombe11.00.981.61.63120
73Nottingham Forest11.00.981.61.6302-1
74Accrington ST11.00.981.00.98120
75QPR11.00.980.70.65110
76Bromley11.00.981.61.63110
77Port Vale11.00.982.32.2803-1
78Wrexham10.70.651.00.9801-0.6
79Rotherham10.70.653.33.2614+0.4
80Huddersfield10.70.651.00.9811+0.4
81Oxford United10.70.651.00.9802-0.6
82Gillingham10.70.653.63.5903-0.6
83York10.70.651.61.6302-0.6
84Northampton10.70.651.00.9801-0.6
85Cheltenham10.70.652.92.9413+0.4
86Swansea10.70.650.30.3301-0.6
87Mansfield Town10.70.651.31.3103-0.6
88Notts County10.70.651.31.3111+0.4
89Bolton10.30.331.00.9801-0.3
90Chesterfield10.30.330.70.6501-0.3
91Swindon Town10.30.331.31.3123+1.7
92Exeter City10.00.002.01.96020
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG-Angriffs-Ranking
BarnsleyHoch xGF2.94
Bristol CityHoch xGF2.94
Aston VillaHoch xGF2.94
Exeter CityNiedrig xGF0.00
Swindon TownNiedrig xGF0.33
ChesterfieldNiedrig xGF0.33

LIGA xG-STATS

92 Teams mit xG-Daten
Liga-Ø xGF/Sp: 1.48
Liga-Ø xGA/Sp: 1.51
Bester Überperformer: Chelsea (+3.1)
Größter Underperformer: Watford (-3.2)

League Cup (England) — Analyse Erwartete Tore (xG)

Die League Cup (England) hat einen Schnitt von 1.66 xG pro Spiel. Barnsley erzeugt die meisten Chancen mit 2.94 xGF pro Spiel, Millwall am wenigsten mit 0.87 xGF. West Ham übertrifft ihr xG — Regression wahrscheinlich.

Wett-Tipp — xG & Regressionseffekte

xG ist der stärkste Prädiktor für zukünftige Leistungen — Teams, die ihr xG konstant übertreffen, tendieren zur Regression. Suche nach Teams mit hohem xG aber Unter-Performance als Wert-Chancen in Ergebnis-Märkten.

Erwartete Tore (xG) — England