AFC Challenge League — 1st Half Table
World · 2026/27
World — AFC Challenge League 2026/27 — Detailed Stats
Leader:Wathba — 8ptsLeague Avg:0.98 goals
Highest Avg:Manila Digger (2.00)
Lowest Avg:Yangon United (0.00)Overall / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wathba | 4 | 2-2-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 8 | DDWW | 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 2 | Manila Digger | 3 | 2-1-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 3 |  Al Qadsia | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 4 |  Goa | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 5 |  Al Ittihad | 4 | 2-1-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 7 | DWLW | 1.75 | 75% | 0% | 50% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 6 |  Ahal | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 6 | WLW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 7 |  Hang Yuen | 4 | 1-3-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | DDDW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 1.25 |
| 8 |  Al Ansar | 3 | 2-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 |
| 9 |  Al Nejmeh | 3 | 1-2-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
| 10 |  Tainan City | 3 | 1-2-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 5 | DWD | 1.67 | 100% | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
| 11 |  Shan United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 12 |  Istiqlol | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | DWL | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 13 |  Regar-TadAZ | 4 | 1-1-2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 4 | WLLD | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 75% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 14 |  Kasuka | 4 | 1-1-2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 | DLLW | 1.00 | 25% | 25% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 |  Paro | 4 | 1-1-2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 4 | DLLW | 1.00 | 50% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 1.50 |
| 16 | Yangon United | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | DDD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 17 |  Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 18 |  Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 19 |  Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 20 |  Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 21 |  Pusamania Borneo | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 22 |  Al Arabi | 3 | 0-1-2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DLL | 0.33 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 23 |  Fortis | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 | LLLD | 0.25 | 25% | 0% | 100% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0.75 |
| 24 |  Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 25 |  Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 26 |  Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 27 |  Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 28 |  Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Half-Time Table
Wathba leads the AFC Challenge League first half table overall with 8 points from 4 games (2W-2D-0L), averaging 1.00 goals per game.
Manila Digger follows in second place with 7 points. The league average at first half overall is 0.98 goals per game, with Manila Digger recording the highest average at 2.00.
Leader:Al Ittihad — 7ptsLeague Avg:0.99 goalsHighest Avg:Manila Digger (2.00)Lowest Avg:Pusamania Borneo (0.00)Home / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ittihad | 3 | 2-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 2 | Manila Digger | 2 | 2-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 3 | Ahal | 2 | 2-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Goa | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 5 | Istiqlol | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 6 | Tainan City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 7 | Al Qadsia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Al Ansar | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Al Nejmeh | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 10 | Paro | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Kasuka | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 12 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 13 | Wathba | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 14 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 15 | Yangon United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 16 | Shan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 17 | Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 18 | Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 19 | Al Arabi | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 20 | Fortis | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 21 | Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 22 | Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 | Regar-TadAZ | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Home Half-Time Table
Al Ittihad leads the AFC Challenge League first half table at home with 7 points from 3 games (2W-1D-0L), averaging 0.67 goals per game.
Manila Digger follows in second place with 6 points. The league average at first half at home is 0.99 goals per game, with Manila Digger recording the highest average at 2.00.
Leader:Wathba — 7ptsLeague Avg:1.06 goalsHighest Avg:Shan United (2.00)Lowest Avg:Yangon United (0.00)Away / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wathba | 3 | 2-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 2 | Al Qadsia | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 3 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 4 | Regar-TadAZ | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | WLD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 5 | Goa | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 | Shan United | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 7 | Al Ansar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 8 | Al Nejmeh | 2 | 0-2-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 9 | Yangon United | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 10 | Manila Digger | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Tainan City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 12 | Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 13 | Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 14 | Kasuka | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 | Paro | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 17 | Al Arabi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 18 | Istiqlol | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 19 | Al Ittihad | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 20 | Ahal | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 21 | Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 22 | Fortis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 | Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 24 | Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Away Half-Time Table
Wathba leads the AFC Challenge League first half table away with 7 points from 3 games (2W-1D-0L), averaging 0.67 goals per game.
Al Qadsia follows in second place with 4 points. The league average at first half away is 1.06 goals per game, with Shan United recording the highest average at 2.00.