AFC Challenge League — Winning / Losing at HT
World · 2026/27
Most Wins:Al Ansar (100%)
Most Draws:Yangon United (100%)
Most Losses:Karketu Dili (100%)League Win Avg:30%Overall / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | W - D - L (HT) | Win % | Draw % | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ansar | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |  Goa | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |  Al Qadsia | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |  Wathba | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |  Al Ittihad | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 6 |  Al Nejmeh | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 7 |  Tainan City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 8 |  Manila Digger | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 |  Shan United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 |  Istiqlol | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 11 |  Ahal | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 |  Hang Yuen | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 13 |  Paro | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 14 |  Kasuka | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 15 | Yangon United | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 |  Pusamania Borneo | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 |  Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 |  Regar-TadAZ | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 19 |  Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 |  Fortis | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 21 |  Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 22 |  Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 |  Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 25 |  Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 26 |  Al Arabi | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 27 |  Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 |  Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Winning & Losing at Half-Time
Al Ansar leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins overall with a 100% win rate (2W-0D-0L from 2 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 30%.
Yangon United draw the most at the break (100%), while Karketu Dili trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Al Ittihad (100%)Most Draws:Pusamania Borneo (100%)Most Losses:Ulaanbaatar (100%)League Win Avg:43%Home / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Home W - D - L (HT) | Home Win % | Home Draw % | Home Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ittihad | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Al Qadsia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Al Ansar | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Al Nejmeh | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Tainan City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Istiqlol | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Goa | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Manila Digger | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Ahal | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | Paro | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 11 | Kasuka | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 13 | Yangon United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Shan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 | Hang Yuen | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Maziya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 | Wathba | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | Fortis | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 19 | Central Stallions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 | Ulaanbaatar | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 21 | Al Arabi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | Regar-TadAZ | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | Dordoi Bishkek | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Home Half-Time Results
Al Ittihad leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins at home with a 100% win rate (2W-0D-0L from 2 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 43%.
Pusamania Borneo draw the most at the break (100%), while Ulaanbaatar trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Wathba (100%)Most Draws:Al Nejmeh (100%)Most Losses:Karketu Dili (100%)League Win Avg:23%Away / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Away W - D - L (HT) | Away Win % | Away Draw % | Away Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wathba | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Goa | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Shan United | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Al Qadsia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Al Ansar | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Hang Yuen | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 7 | Al Nejmeh | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 8 | Muras United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 9 | Manila Digger | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 10 | Regar-TadAZ | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 11 | Tainan City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 12 | Yangon United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 13 | Ezra | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Karketu Dili | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 15 | Al Arabi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 16 | Istiqlol | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 17 | Al Ittihad | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 18 | Ahal | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 19 | Paro | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 20 | Bangladesh Police | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 21 | Kasuka | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 | Fortis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 23 | Abu Muslim | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 24 | Pusamania Borneo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Challenge League 2026 — Away Half-Time Results
Wathba leads AFC Challenge League in half-time wins away with a 100% win rate (2W-0D-0L from 2 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 23%.
Al Nejmeh draw the most at the break (100%), while Karketu Dili trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.