Denmark Series - Group 1 — Failed To Score
Denmark · 2025/26
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Såby | 18 | 8 | 44% | 56% | 33% |
| 2 |  LSF | 18 | 6 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 3 |  Frederikssund | 18 | 6 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 4 |  AB Tårnby | 17 | 5 | 29% | 22% | 38% |
| 5 |  Herlev | 18 | 5 | 28% | 33% | 22% |
| 6 |  Espergærde | 17 | 3 | 18% | 25% | 11% |
| 7 |  Næstved II | 18 | 3 | 17% | 11% | 22% |
| 8 |  Avarta | 18 | 2 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| 9 |  Tårnby FF | 18 | 2 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
| 10 |  Glostrup | 18 | 2 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Såby | 9 | 5 | 56% |
| 2 | Herlev | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 3 | LSF | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 4 | Espergærde | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 5 | AB Tårnby | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 6 | Avarta | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 7 | Tårnby FF | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 8 | Næstved II | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 9 | Glostrup | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 10 | Frederikssund | 9 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frederikssund | 9 | 6 | 67% |
| 2 | AB Tårnby | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 3 | LSF | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 4 | Såby | 9 | 3 | 33% |
| 5 | Herlev | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 6 | Næstved II | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 7 | Avarta | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 8 | Tårnby FF | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 9 | Glostrup | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 10 | Espergærde | 9 | 1 | 11% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Såby fails to score most often in the league — 44%
LSF is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 33%
Frederikssund is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 33%
Glostrup rarely fails to score — 11%
Tårnby FF rarely fails to score — 11%
Avarta rarely fails to score — 11%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 10 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 24%
- Home FTS rate: 21%
- Away FTS rate: 26%
Denmark Series - Group 1 (Denmark) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Denmark Series - Group 1 (Denmark), teams fail to score in 47% of matches this season. Såby fails to score the most, going blank in 44% of their games (8 matches), with 56% at home and 33% away. Glostrup has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 11% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Denmark
- 1. Division Failed To Score— Division Gold
- 2. Division Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 2nd Division - Group 2 Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 3. Division Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- B-Liga Women Failed To Score
- DBU Pokalen Failed To Score— Division Gold
- Denmark Series - Group 2 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 3 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 4 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Promotion Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Relegation Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Kvindeliga Failed To Score— Division Women's Pro
- Superliga Failed To Score— Division Premium