Denmark Series - Group 2 — Failed To Score
Denmark · 2025/26
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Fredensborg BI | 17 | 5 | 29% | 22% | 38% |
| 2 |  Hvidovre II | 17 | 5 | 29% | 38% | 22% |
| 3 |  GVI | 17 | 4 | 24% | 38% | 11% |
| 4 |  Skjold Sæby | 17 | 3 | 18% | 0% | 38% |
| 5 |  Sydkysten | 18 | 3 | 17% | 22% | 11% |
| 6 |  Gladsaxe | 16 | 2 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| 7 |  Skovshoved | 17 | 2 | 12% | 0% | 25% |
| 8 |  Gørslev | 17 | 2 | 12% | 0% | 25% |
| 9 |  Allerød | 17 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 10 |  Ringsted | 17 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GVI | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 2 | Hvidovre II | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 3 | Fredensborg BI | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 4 | Sydkysten | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 5 | Allerød | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 6 | Ringsted | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 7 | Gladsaxe | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 8 | Skjold Sæby | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Skovshoved | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | Gørslev | 9 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skjold Sæby | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 2 | Fredensborg BI | 8 | 3 | 38% |
| 3 | Skovshoved | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 4 | Gørslev | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| 5 | Hvidovre II | 9 | 2 | 22% |
| 6 | Gladsaxe | 8 | 1 | 13% |
| 7 | GVI | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 8 | Sydkysten | 9 | 1 | 11% |
| 9 | Allerød | 9 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | Ringsted | 9 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Fredensborg BI fails to score most often in the league — 29%
Hvidovre II is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 29%
GVI is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 24%
Ringsted rarely fails to score — 6%
Allerød rarely fails to score — 6%
Gørslev rarely fails to score — 12%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 10 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 16%
- Home FTS rate: 15%
- Away FTS rate: 18%
Denmark Series - Group 2 (Denmark) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Denmark Series - Group 2 (Denmark), teams fail to score in 33% of matches this season. Fredensborg BI fails to score the most, going blank in 29% of their games (5 matches), with 22% at home and 38% away. Ringsted has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 6% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Denmark
- 1. Division Failed To Score— Division Gold
- 2. Division Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 2nd Division - Group 2 Failed To Score— Division Regional
- 3. Division Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- B-Liga Women Failed To Score
- DBU Pokalen Failed To Score— Division Gold
- Denmark Series - Group 1 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 3 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Group 4 Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Promotion Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Denmark Series - Relegation Round Failed To Score— Division Amateur
- Kvindeliga Failed To Score— Division Women's Pro
- Superliga Failed To Score— Division Premium