AFC Champions League Elite — Corner Stats
World · 2026/27
Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 13.0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 13.0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 12.5 | |
| 4 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 12.0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 11.7 | |
| 6 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 11.0 | |
| 7 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 8 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 9 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 10.7 | |
| 10 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.7 | |
| 11 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.7 | |
| 12 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 9.3 | |
| 13 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 9.3 | |
| 14 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 9.3 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 16 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 17 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 18 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 19 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 | |
| 20 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 | |
| 21 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 8.0 | |
| 22 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 23 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 24 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.7 | |
| 25 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.7 | |
| 26 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.7 | |
| 27 | 3 | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.7 | |
| 28 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 | |
| 29 | 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.3 | |
| 30 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 31 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 | |
| 32 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 |
Total Corners
League avg
9.14
Highest avg
13.0
Lowest avg
4.0
Total Corners in AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Stats & Analysis
Al Quwa Al Jawiya leads the AFC Champions League Elite with 13.00 total corners per fixture, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
Al-Gharafa (12.00) and Neftchi (11.67) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 12.22 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Công An Nhân Dân produce just 6.00 total corners per fixture — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The AFC Champions League Elite features moderate corner activity, with a league-wide average of 9.20 total corners per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Al Quwa Al Jawiya, Al-Gharafa, and Neftchi — average 12.22 collectively, sitting 3.02 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Corners For
| # | Team | MP | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 8.0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 7.5 | |
| 3 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 7.5 | |
| 4 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 7.3 | |
| 5 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 7.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 7.0 | |
| 7 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.3 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 9 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.0 | |
| 10 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 11 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 12 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 5.3 | |
| 13 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 4.7 | |
| 15 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 16 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 17 | 3 | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 18 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 4.3 | |
| 19 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 20 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 21 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 22 | 3 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 23 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 24 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 25 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 26 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 27 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 28 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 29 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 30 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 31 | 3 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 32 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 |
Corners For
League avg
4.63
Highest avg
8.0
Lowest avg
1.0
Corners Won (For) in AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Stats
Al-Ittihad FC leads the AFC Champions League Elite with 7.33 corners won per match, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
Al-Hilal Saudi FC (7.00) and Kyoto Sanga (7.00) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 7.11 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Buriram United produce just 1.67 corners won per match — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The AFC Champions League Elite features moderate corner activity, with a league-wide average of 4.51 corners won per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Al-Ittihad FC, Al-Hilal Saudi FC, and Kyoto Sanga — average 7.11 collectively, sitting 2.6 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Corners Against
| # | Team | MP | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 9.7 | |
| 2 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 7.3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 7.3 | |
| 4 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.7 | |
| 5 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 5.7 | |
| 7 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 5.7 | |
| 8 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.7 | |
| 9 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 | |
| 10 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 5.3 | |
| 11 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 12 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 5.0 | |
| 13 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 15 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 16 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 17 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 4.3 | |
| 18 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 19 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 20 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 21 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 22 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 23 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 24 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 25 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 26 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 27 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 28 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 29 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 30 | 3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 31 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 32 | 3 | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 |
Corners Against
League avg
4.51
Highest avg
9.7
Lowest avg
2.0
Corners Conceded (Against) in AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Stats
Al Quwa Al Jawiya leads the AFC Champions League Elite with 9.67 corners conceded per match, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
Al-Gharafa (7.33) and Buriram United (7.33) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 8.11 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Kashiwa Reysol produce just 2.00 corners conceded per match — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The AFC Champions League Elite features moderate corner activity, with a league-wide average of 4.69 corners conceded per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Al Quwa Al Jawiya, Al-Gharafa, and Buriram United — average 8.11 collectively, sitting 3.42 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Home Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 16.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 13.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 13.0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 12.5 | |
| 6 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 12.5 | |
| 7 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 17 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 18 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 19 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 20 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 22 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 23 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 24 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 27 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 | |
| 28 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 |
Home Total Corners
League avg
9.11
Highest avg
16.0
Lowest avg
3.0
Away Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 13.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 6 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11.5 | |
| 7 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 11.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 12 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 10.5 | |
| 13 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 10.5 | |
| 14 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 18 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 19 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 20 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 8.5 | |
| 21 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 22 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 23 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 | |
| 24 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 27 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 | |
| 28 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 |
Away Total Corners
League avg
9.24
Highest avg
14.0
Lowest avg
4.0