AFC Champions League Elite — Winning / Losing at HT
World · 2026/27
Most Wins:Al Ain (100%)
Most Draws:Al Shamal (100%)
Most Losses:Al-Gharafa (100%)League Win Avg:22%Overall / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | W - D - L (HT) | Win % | Draw % | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ain | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |  Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 3 |  Kashiwa Reysol | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 4 |  Esteghlal FC | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |  Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 |  Al-Nassr | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 7 |  SHANGHAI SIPG | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 8 |  Buriram United | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 9 |  Beijing Guoan | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 10 |  Al-Qadisiyah FC | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 11 |  Al-Ahli Jeddah | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 12 |  Kashima | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 13 |  Vissel Kobe | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 14 |  Newcastle Jets | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 15 |  Công An Nhân Dân | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 16 |  Gamba Osaka | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 17 |  Al-Ittihad FC | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 18 |  Pakhtakor | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 19 | Al Shamal | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 |  Johor Darul Takzim FC | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 21 |  Daejeon Citizen | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 22 |  Port FC | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 23 |  Al-Wasl FC | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 |  Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 25 |  Neftchi | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 26 |  Kyoto Sanga | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 27 |  Ratchaburi | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 28 |  Pohang Steelers | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 29 |  Jeonbuk Motors | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 30 |  Al Sadd | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 31 |  Gangwon FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 32 |  Tractor Sazi | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 33 | Al-Gharafa | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 34 |  Al Hussein | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 35 |  Adelaide United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 36 |  Al-Jazira | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Winning & Losing at Half-Time
Al Ain leads AFC Champions League Elite in half-time wins overall with a 100% win rate (3W-0D-0L from 3 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 22%.
Al Shamal draw the most at the break (100%), while Al-Gharafa trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Al Ain (100%)Most Draws:SHANGHAI SIPG (100%)Most Losses:Al-Ittihad FC (100%)League Win Avg:26%Home / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Home W - D - L (HT) | Home Win % | Home Draw % | Home Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ain | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Kashiwa Reysol | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Al-Nassr | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Esteghlal FC | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Vissel Kobe | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Kashima | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 8 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | Al-Ahli Jeddah | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 11 | Pakhtakor | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | Gamba Osaka | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Daejeon Citizen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 | Al Shamal | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Neftchi | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 | Johor Darul Takzim FC | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | Al-Qadisiyah FC | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 19 | Công An Nhân Dân | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 | Kyoto Sanga | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | Newcastle Jets | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 22 | Tractor Sazi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | Gangwon FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Pohang Steelers | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 25 | Ratchaburi | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | Buriram United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 27 | Port FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 28 | Al-Wasl FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | Al-Ittihad FC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | Al Sadd | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | Al-Jazira | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | Jeonbuk Motors | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 34 | Adelaide United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 35 | Al-Gharafa | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Home Half-Time Results
Al Ain leads AFC Champions League Elite in half-time wins at home with a 100% win rate (2W-0D-0L from 2 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 26%.
SHANGHAI SIPG draw the most at the break (100%), while Al-Ittihad FC trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.
Most Wins:Al Ain (100%)Most Draws:Vissel Kobe (100%)Most Losses:Neftchi (100%)League Win Avg:22%Away / Winning or Losing at Half-Time
| # | Team | MP | Away W - D - L (HT) | Away Win % | Away Draw % | Away Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Ain | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Shabab Al Ahli Dubai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Al-Qadisiyah FC | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Esteghlal FC | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 6 | Kashiwa Reysol | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 7 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 8 | Buriram United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | Newcastle Jets | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 10 | Al-Ittihad FC | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 11 | Công An Nhân Dân | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 12 | Vissel Kobe | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 13 | Gamba Osaka | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 14 | Pakhtakor | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 | Ratchaburi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Port FC | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 17 | Johor Darul Takzim FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | Beijing Guoan | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 19 | Al-Wasl FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 | Al Sadd | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | Daejeon Citizen | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 22 | Al-Ahli Jeddah | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | Kyoto Sanga | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Kashima | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 25 | Al Shamal | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 26 | Jeonbuk Motors | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | Pohang Steelers | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 28 | Al Quwa Al Jawiya | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 | Neftchi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | Al-Gharafa | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | Al Hussein | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | Tractor Sazi | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | Al-Nassr | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
AFC Champions League Elite 2026 — Away Half-Time Results
Al Ain leads AFC Champions League Elite in half-time wins away with a 100% win rate (1W-0D-0L from 1 games). The league average win rate at half-time is 22%.
Vissel Kobe draw the most at the break (100%), while Neftchi trail most often heading into the second half (100% loss rate). These patterns are key indicators for in-play and half-time betting markets.