League One — Form Table
China · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 6 | +14 | 16 | WLDWWWW | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.86 | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 16 | DWLWWWW | 2.29 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 1.29 | 43% | 14% | 1.71 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 9 | +5 | 14 | WDDWWWL | 2.00 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 14 | WWDWWDL | 2.00 | 71% | 43% | 14% | 1.00 | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 13 | WWWDDDD | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 11 | LWWWLDD | 1.57 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.00 | 43% | 29% | 1.86 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 10 | WWDDLDD | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 10 | LWLWDWL | 1.43 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 10 | WWDLDDD | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 14% | 2.14 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 | DDWLLDD | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 5 | LLLDDLW | 0.71 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 5 | LWLLLDD | 0.71 | 29% | 71% | 14% | 0.29 | 29% | 0% | 1.14 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 5 | DLWLDLL | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 5 | LDLDWLL | 0.71 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 | LLLLDLW | 0.57 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 4 | LLLLLDW | 0.57 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Shaanxi Union leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 games.
Nantong Zhiyun is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Guangzhou E-Power is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Nanjing City is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Yanbian Longding is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Dongguan United has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The League One (China) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the League One in this period is 34%
- •Teams score an average of 1.22 goals per game and concede 1.23 — a combined 2.46 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 48% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 30% of games.
League One (China) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Shaanxi Union, Nantong Zhiyun and Guangzhou E-Power have been the standout performers in the League One (China) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.29, 2.29 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the League One, teams score an average of 1.22 goals and concede 1.23 per game — a combined 2.46 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 48% of fixtures while 30% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Nanjing City and Yanbian Longding have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League One.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | +15 | 19 | WWWDWWW | 2.71 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.86 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 4 | +10 | 17 | WWDWWDW | 2.43 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.00 | 100% | 43% | 2.57 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 15 | WDDWWWD | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 15 | DWWDWWD | 2.14 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 1.14 | 43% | 29% | 1.57 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 15 | WDDWWDW | 2.14 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 29% | 1.57 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 14 | LWDWWWD | 2.00 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.14 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 13 | LWWDLWW | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.00 | 71% | 43% | 3.00 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 12 | WDWWDLD | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.71 | 71% | 43% | 2.86 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 10 | WDLWLLW | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 12 | +1 | 10 | DWDLWDD | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.57 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 9 | WWLWLLL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 86% | 71% | 3.43 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 7 | LWLLWDL | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 6 | DLWLLDD | 0.86 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 | LLLDWDD | 0.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 5 | LDDLLLW | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 29% | 2.29 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 4 | LLLLLDW | 0.57 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 43% | 2.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Shaanxi Union leads the form table with 86% wins and 2.71 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Guangzhou E-Power is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.43 PPG.
Dalian Huayi is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.14 PPG.
Dongguan United is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Nanjing City is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
Ningbo Professional has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The League One (China) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the League One in this period is 43%
- •Teams score an average of 1.51 goals per game and concede 1.21 — a combined 2.72 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 55% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 22% of games.
League One (China) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Shaanxi Union, Guangzhou E-Power and Dalian Huayi have been the standout performers in the League One (China) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.71, 2.43 and 2.14 PPG respectively. Across the League One, teams score an average of 1.51 goals and concede 1.21 per game — a combined 2.72 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 55% of fixtures while 22% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Dongguan United and Nanjing City have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.71 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League One.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 16 | WWWDWWL | 2.29 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 15 | WWLWWWL | 2.14 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | 57% | 29% | 2.29 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 14 | DWWWWDL | 2.00 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 57% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 12 | WWLLLWW | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 2.00 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 12 | DDDLWWW | 1.71 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.29 | 57% | 29% | 2.14 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 | LDLWWDD | 1.29 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.57 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 8 | LDDWDDD | 1.14 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.86 | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 | WDWLLLD | 1.14 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 43% | 2.57 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 7 | WWDLLLL | 1.00 | 29% | 71% | 14% | 0.43 | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 5 | DLDLLLW | 0.71 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.71 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 | LLDLLLW | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 3.43 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 3 | LLLDLDD | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 0.86 | 100% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 | LLDDLLD | 0.43 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 2 | LLDLLLD | 0.29 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 2 | LLLLDLD | 0.29 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 0.43 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 24 | -17 | 2 | DLLLDLL | 0.29 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 100% | 71% | 4.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Guangzhou E-Power leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Guangxi Hengchen is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Hebei Kungfu is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Dongguan United is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
Meizhou Kejia is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
Nanjing City has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.29 PPG.
- •The League One (China) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the League One in this period is 27%
- •Teams score an average of 1.21 goals per game and concede 1.59 — a combined 2.79 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 55% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 32% of games.
League One (China) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Guangzhou E-Power, Guangxi Hengchen and Hebei Kungfu have been the standout performers in the League One (China) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.29, 2.14 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the League One, teams score an average of 1.21 goals and concede 1.59 per game — a combined 2.79 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 55% of fixtures while 32% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Dongguan United and Meizhou Kejia have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.29 and 0.29 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League One.
Form Tables — China
- FA Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- League Two Form Table— Division Pro
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- Super League Form Table— Division Premium