League Two — Form Table
China · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Changchun Xidu | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 15 | DWWDDWW | 2.14 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.29 | |
| 2 |  Dalian Kewei | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 14 | WLWDWDW | 2.00 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 1.86 | |
| 3 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 13 | DDDWWDW | 1.86 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.71 | 100% | 29% | 2.57 | |
| 4 |  Shanghai Port II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 13 | WWWLWDL | 1.86 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 5 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 12 | WLWDDWD | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 6 |  BIT | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 12 | DWWLWDD | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 43% | 3.00 | |
| 7 |  Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 11 | WLLWDDW | 1.57 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 57% | 29% | 2.57 | |
| 8 |  Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 11 | LWDLWDW | 1.57 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 1.29 | 86% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 9 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 11 | WDWWLLD | 1.57 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 57% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 10 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 11 | LDLWDWW | 1.57 | 57% | 57% | 14% | 0.57 | 14% | 14% | 1.00 | |
| 11 |  Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 10 | WLLWLDW | 1.43 | 57% | 57% | 0% | 1.14 | 71% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 12 |  Langfang Glory City | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 | WDLDDDW | 1.43 | 57% | 57% | 29% | 0.86 | 43% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 13 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 9 | WDLLDWD | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 57% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 14 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | LWLDWDL | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0.71 | 43% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 15 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | DWWLDLL | 1.14 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 0.86 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 16 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 | LDDDWDL | 1.00 | 43% | 57% | 29% | 0.86 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 17 |  Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 | LDDLWDD | 1.00 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 18 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 7 | LWLWLLD | 1.00 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.57 | 43% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 19 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 | DDLLWDL | 0.86 | 29% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 43% | 29% | 1.43 | |
| 20 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 5 | DLWDLLL | 0.71 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.43 | 43% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 21 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 5 | DLWLLDL | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 86% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 22 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 5 | LLLWLDD | 0.71 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 86% | 57% | 2.71 | |
| 23 |  Shanghai Second | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 | LDLDDLD | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 24 |  Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | DLDDLDL | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 71% | 14% | 1.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Changchun Xidu leads the form table with 57% wins and 2.14 PPG in the last 7 games.
Dalian Kewei is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Shanghai Port II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Chengdu Rongcheng II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Shanghai Second is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Shangyu Pterosaur has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 31%
- •Teams score an average of 0.97 goals per game and concede 0.99 — a combined 1.96 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 41% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 38% of games.
League Two (China) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Changchun Xidu, Dalian Kewei and Shanghai Port II have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.14, 2.00 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 0.97 goals and concede 0.99 per game — a combined 1.96 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 41% of fixtures while 38% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Chengdu Rongcheng II and Shanghai Second have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 19 | WWWDWWW | 2.71 | 86% | 14% | 14% | 1.43 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5 | +9 | 15 | WWWWLWL | 2.14 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 2.00 | 57% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 3 | Dalian Kewei | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 13 | DWDWDDW | 1.86 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 4 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 13 | WLWWDLW | 1.86 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 1.71 | |
| 5 | Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 12 | LDWDWWD | 1.71 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 6 | Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 12 | DDWWWLD | 1.71 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.29 | 57% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 7 | Langfang Glory City | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 12 | WDWWLDD | 1.71 | 57% | 57% | 29% | 1.00 | 43% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 8 | Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 11 | DLWDWWL | 1.57 | 57% | 57% | 14% | 1.14 | 29% | 14% | 1.71 | |
| 9 | BIT | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 11 | DLLWDWW | 1.57 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 10 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 10 | LDWDDDW | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 11 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 10 | LWLWLDW | 1.43 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 12 | Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 10 | WWDDLDD | 1.43 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 57% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 9 | DLDLWDW | 1.29 | 71% | 57% | 14% | 1.00 | 57% | 43% | 1.57 | |
| 14 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 9 | LLWDDDW | 1.29 | 57% | 57% | 14% | 0.86 | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | |
| 15 | Shanghai Port II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 9 | LLLWWWL | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 16 | Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 8 | DLLLWDW | 1.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 17 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 8 | LWWLDDL | 1.14 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.57 | 71% | 43% | 3.00 | |
| 18 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 8 | WDDLLLW | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | |
| 19 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 | DDDLWDD | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.57 | 100% | 43% | 3.29 | |
| 20 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 | WDLLWLD | 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 29% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 21 | Changchun Xidu | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 | LLLWDDW | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 22 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 | LDDLDLW | 0.86 | 29% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 71% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 23 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 | LLDLDWL | 0.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 24 | Shanghai Second | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | LLDLDDD | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 86% | 14% | 1.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Xi'an Ronghai leads the form table with 86% wins and 2.71 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Shenzhen 2028 is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Guizhou Zhucheng is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Shanghai Second is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Yichun Grand Tiger is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
Guangzhou Dandelion has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 36%
- •Teams score an average of 1.18 goals per game and concede 0.95 — a combined 2.14 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 45% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 31% of games.
League Two (China) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Xi'an Ronghai, Shenzhen 2028 and Guizhou Zhucheng have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.71, 2.14 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 1.18 goals and concede 0.95 per game — a combined 2.14 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 45% of fixtures while 31% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Shanghai Second and Yichun Grand Tiger have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.71 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 14 | WWWDLWD | 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 2 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 14 | DLWWWDW | 2.00 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.43 | 86% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 3 | Langfang Glory City | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | DWDWDDW | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 4 | Dalian Kewei | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 13 | WLWDLWW | 1.86 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 5 | Changchun Xidu | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 | LWDDDWW | 1.71 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 2.57 | |
| 6 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 11 | LWDWLDW | 1.57 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 7 | Shanghai Port II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 10 | LWWLWLD | 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 8 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 10 | LDWWWLL | 1.43 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 9 | Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 10 | WDDLDWD | 1.43 | 43% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | |
| 10 | Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | LWWWLLD | 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.71 | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | |
| 11 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 | DWLWDDL | 1.29 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 57% | 43% | 2.86 | |
| 12 | Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 9 | DLWDWLD | 1.29 | 57% | 57% | 14% | 0.43 | 29% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 13 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | WWLDLDL | 1.14 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 14 | Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 | LDDDDWL | 1.00 | 43% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 43% | 1.86 | |
| 15 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 7 | DDDWLDL | 1.00 | 57% | 71% | 14% | 0.43 | 57% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 16 | Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 | DWLDDLL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 17 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 | WDLLDDL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 18 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 | LLDWLDD | 0.86 | 29% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 19 | Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 6 | LWLLWLL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 71% | 43% | 2.57 | |
| 20 | BIT | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 5 | LLLWLDD | 0.71 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 86% | 43% | 3.43 | |
| 21 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 4 | LDDLDDL | 0.57 | 29% | 71% | 29% | 0.29 | 57% | 0% | 1.29 | |
| 22 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 17 | -16 | 4 | WDLLLLL | 0.57 | 29% | 86% | 0% | 0.14 | 57% | 57% | 2.57 | |
| 23 | Shanghai Second | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 3 | LDDLDLL | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 24 | Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 3 | DLDLLDL | 0.43 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 0.43 | 71% | 29% | 1.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Shandong Taishan II leads the form table with 57% wins and 2.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Nantong Haimen Codion is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Dalian Kewei is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Qingdao Red Lions is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.43 PPG.
Shanghai Second is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.43 PPG.
Chengdu Rongcheng II has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.57 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 28%
- •Teams score an average of 0.92 goals per game and concede 1.19 — a combined 2.11 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 43% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 42% of games.
League Two (China) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Shandong Taishan II, Nantong Haimen Codion and Dalian Kewei have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.00, 2.00 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 0.92 goals and concede 1.19 per game — a combined 2.11 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 43% of fixtures while 42% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Qingdao Red Lions and Shanghai Second have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.43 and 0.43 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Form Tables — China
- FA Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- League One Form Table— Division Gold
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- Super League Form Table— Division Premium