League Two — Home & Away Tables
China · 2026
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 5 | +17 | 28 | LWWDL | 2.33 | 67% | 25% | 1.83 | 50% | 42% | 2.25 | ||
| 2 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 11 | +16 | 26 | WWWLW | 2.17 | 33% | 50% | 2.25 | 75% | 58% | 3.17 | ||
| 3 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | +10 | 25 | WDWDW | 2.27 | 73% | 27% | 1.27 | 45% | 27% | 1.64 | ||
| 4 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 22 | WWWWD | 2.00 | 64% | 18% | 1.64 | 82% | 36% | 2.45 | ||
| 5 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 21 | LLLWW | 1.75 | 42% | 50% | 1.42 | 58% | 42% | 2.33 | ||
| 6 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 19 | WDDLD | 1.58 | 33% | 50% | 1.25 | 50% | 42% | 2.17 | ||
| 7 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 19 | LWDDD | 1.58 | 33% | 42% | 0.92 | 42% | 42% | 1.67 | ||
| 8 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 18 | LWDWW | 1.50 | 33% | 50% | 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 2.00 | ||
| 9 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 17 | DDLDL | 1.55 | 64% | 27% | 1.09 | 64% | 27% | 1.82 | ||
| 10 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 17 | LWDLL | 1.55 | 36% | 36% | 1.18 | 64% | 36% | 2.09 | ||
| 11 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 17 | DWDWW | 1.55 | 45% | 45% | 1.18 | 45% | 36% | 2.18 | ||
| 12 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 16 | DDLLL | 1.33 | 33% | 50% | 1.17 | 67% | 42% | 2.08 | ||
| 13 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 16 | DDDWW | 1.45 | 73% | 18% | 0.64 | 27% | 27% | 1.27 | ||
| 14 | 12 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 18 | 14 | +4 | 15 | DWDDD | 1.25 | 25% | 75% | 1.50 | 83% | 58% | 2.67 | ||
| 15 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 9 | +3 | 15 | DWDWW | 1.25 | 58% | 42% | 1.00 | 58% | 42% | 1.75 | ||
| 16 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 14 | LDDDL | 1.27 | 18% | 64% | 1.36 | 82% | 36% | 2.73 | ||
| 17 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 13 | DLWWL | 1.18 | 18% | 64% | 1.36 | 64% | 45% | 2.45 | ||
| 18 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 13 | WDLLL | 1.18 | 27% | 64% | 1.36 | 73% | 55% | 2.73 | ||
| 19 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 13 | LDLDW | 1.08 | 25% | 42% | 0.67 | 50% | 17% | 1.58 | ||
| 20 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 12 | DDLDL | 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 1.17 | 83% | 58% | 2.67 | ||
| 21 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 11 | DLLLW | 1.00 | 36% | 36% | 0.55 | 45% | 18% | 1.36 | ||
| 22 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | LLWLW | 0.91 | 27% | 27% | 0.73 | 45% | 18% | 1.55 | ||
| 23 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 10 | LLWDW | 0.83 | 8% | 67% | 0.92 | 75% | 42% | 2.33 | ||
| 24 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 6 | LLLDL | 0.55 | 9% | 55% | 0.64 | 82% | 36% | 2.45 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing at Home?
Guizhou Zhucheng is performing extremely well at home. Their home game win percentage is 75%.
Shenzhen 2028 is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 67%.
Dalian Kewei is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 64%.
Shanghai Second is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. Shanghai Second has a home game win ratio of 9%.
BIT is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. BIT has a home game win ratio of 17%.
Nantong Haimen Codion has the lowest home game win percentage of all teams with 17%.
- •League Two (China) Home Table consists of 24 teams that have each played an average of 11.5 matches at home venues.
- •Home win % in the League Two is 36%
- •Home teams in the League Two score an average of 1.18 goals per game, while they concede 0.96 per match at home games.
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 23 | WWWWD | 2.09 | 36% | 55% | 1.64 | 73% | 55% | 2.55 | ||
| 2 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 22 | DLWWL | 2.00 | 45% | 36% | 1.82 | 64% | 45% | 2.55 | ||
| 3 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 18 | DDWLW | 1.64 | 36% | 55% | 1.45 | 55% | 55% | 2.73 | ||
| 4 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 18 | DWWWL | 1.50 | 42% | 42% | 1.00 | 67% | 25% | 1.83 | ||
| 5 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 18 | WWWLL | 1.50 | 33% | 42% | 0.92 | 50% | 33% | 1.67 | ||
| 6 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 18 | DWDWD | 1.50 | 33% | 58% | 1.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.42 | ||
| 7 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 15 | LWDLW | 1.25 | 50% | 42% | 0.75 | 50% | 33% | 1.58 | ||
| 8 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 15 | LWDWL | 1.25 | 50% | 25% | 0.50 | 42% | 8% | 1.17 | ||
| 9 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 | WWDDL | 1.27 | 36% | 45% | 1.00 | 55% | 27% | 2.00 | ||
| 10 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 14 | DDWLD | 1.27 | 18% | 64% | 1.00 | 73% | 55% | 2.27 | ||
| 11 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 14 | LWWLD | 1.27 | 45% | 27% | 0.91 | 64% | 27% | 2.09 | ||
| 12 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 13 | DWDLL | 1.18 | 18% | 64% | 1.27 | 64% | 45% | 2.55 | ||
| 13 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 13 | DDDDW | 1.08 | 50% | 42% | 0.67 | 42% | 33% | 1.50 | ||
| 14 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 13 | DLLDW | 1.18 | 36% | 36% | 0.82 | 55% | 36% | 1.91 | ||
| 15 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 12 | LDLWW | 1.09 | 45% | 36% | 0.73 | 55% | 36% | 1.64 | ||
| 16 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 21 | -4 | 12 | WLLWL | 1.00 | 8% | 67% | 1.42 | 75% | 67% | 3.17 | ||
| 17 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 12 | WDDDW | 1.09 | 36% | 45% | 0.73 | 64% | 27% | 1.82 | ||
| 18 | 12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 20 | -9 | 12 | WDDDW | 1.00 | 17% | 58% | 0.92 | 83% | 58% | 2.58 | ||
| 19 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 18 | -14 | 12 | DLLLL | 1.00 | 50% | 8% | 0.33 | 42% | 33% | 1.83 | ||
| 20 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 10 | WDLDL | 0.91 | 18% | 36% | 0.73 | 55% | 9% | 1.73 | ||
| 21 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 10 | WDWLD | 0.83 | 17% | 67% | 1.00 | 75% | 50% | 2.42 | ||
| 22 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 10 | DDLDD | 0.83 | 33% | 17% | 0.33 | 50% | 8% | 1.42 | ||
| 23 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 9 | DDLDL | 0.75 | 8% | 75% | 1.25 | 83% | 58% | 2.92 | ||
| 24 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 25 | -14 | 9 | LLLLW | 0.82 | 27% | 55% | 1.00 | 64% | 55% | 3.27 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing Away From Home?
Shandong Taishan II is performing extremely well away from home. Their away game win percentage is 64%.
Shanghai Port II is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 64%.
Hubei Chufeng Heli is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 45%.
Shanghai Second is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Shanghai Second has an away game win ratio of 8%.
Chengdu Rongcheng II is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Chengdu Rongcheng II has an away game win ratio of 17%.
Wuhan Three Towns II has the lowest away game win percentage of all teams with 17%.
- •League Two (China) Away Table consists of 24 teams that have each played an average of 11.5 matches away from home.
- •Away win % in the League Two is 29%
- •Away teams in the League Two score an average of 0.96 goals per game, while they concede 1.18 per match away from home.
League Two (China) Home and Away Table Insights
276 home fixtures have been played so far in the League Two (China). As it stands right now, Guizhou Zhucheng, Shenzhen 2028 and Dalian Kewei are the top 3 best performers at home, with win percentages of 75%, 67% and 64% respectively. Home teams in the League Two score an average of 1.18 goals per match while conceding 0.96, giving a combined average of 2.14 total goals per game — making Under 2.5 goals the more frequent result in home fixtures. The BTTS rate at home stands at 46% while 38% of home matches end in a Clean Sheet. At the other end of the home table, Shanghai Second and BIT have struggled at home with win rates of just 9% and 17%.
Meanwhile, the League Two away table tells a slightly different story. Shandong Taishan II, Shanghai Port II and Hubei Chufeng Heli have been the standout performers on the road, with away win rates of 64%, 64% and 45%. Away teams in the League Two score 0.96 goals per game and concede 1.18 — a combined 2.14 total goals per match, suggesting Under 2.5 goals is the more likely away result. BTTS is recorded in 46% of away fixtures, while 33% end in a Clean Sheet for the visiting side. Shanghai Second and Chengdu Rongcheng II have found life on the road particularly difficult, with away win percentages of just 8% and 17% respectively.
Home & Away Tables — China
- FA Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Gold
- League One Home & Away Tables— Division Gold
- Super Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Premium
- Super League Home & Away Tables— Division Premium