World Cup - Qualification Asia — Card Stats
World · 2026
Yellow Cards — Match Total
| # | Team | MP | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 5.3 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 3 | 6 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 5.0 | |
| 4 | 18 | 94% | 94% | 72% | 50% | 28% | 17% | 4.6 | |
| 5 | 13 | 92% | 85% | 69% | 54% | 23% | 15% | 4.5 | |
| 6 | 17 | 94% | 71% | 65% | 47% | 29% | 6% | 4.2 | |
| 7 | 12 | 100% | 75% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 0% | 4.1 | |
| 8 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 9 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 11 | 15 | 80% | 73% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 3.9 | |
| 12 | 6 | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 3.8 | |
| 13 | 14 | 86% | 71% | 50% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 3.7 | |
| 14 | 9 | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 15 | 16 | 81% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 3.6 | |
| 16 | 8 | 100% | 88% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.6 | |
| 17 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 | |
| 18 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 19 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 20 | 13 | 92% | 62% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 3.3 | |
| 21 | 13 | 92% | 62% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 3.2 | |
| 22 | 13 | 85% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 3.2 | |
| 23 | 9 | 89% | 78% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.1 | |
| 24 | 14 | 86% | 50% | 50% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 27 | 9 | 89% | 44% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 2.9 | |
| 28 | 11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 29 | 14 | 79% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 30 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 31 | 4 | 75% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 32 | 11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 33 | 4 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 34 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 35 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 36 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 37 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 39 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 40 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 41 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 |
Yellow Cards — Match Total
League avg
3.16
Most carded
5.3
Fewest carded
0.8
Yellow Cards per Match in World Cup - Qualification Asia 2026
Afghanistan leads World Cup - Qualification Asia with an average of 5.25 yellow cards per match across 4 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Singapore (5.00) and Qatar (4.61) follow closely, with the trio averaging 4.95 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Myanmar averages just 0.75 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 4 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The World Cup - Qualification Asia averages 3.28 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Afghanistan, Singapore, Qatar) averages 4.95 collectively, sitting 1.67 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards For
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 3.5 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 4 | 6 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 2.8 | |
| 5 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 6 | 12 | 100% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 8% | 2.4 | |
| 7 | 9 | 100% | 78% | 56% | 0% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 8 | 16 | 100% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 9 | 13 | 92% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 2.1 | |
| 10 | 4 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 12 | 3 | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 13 | 15 | 87% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 2.0 | |
| 14 | 8 | 100% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 16 | 18 | 78% | 67% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 17 | 13 | 100% | 62% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 18 | 17 | 88% | 53% | 29% | 6% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 19 | 13 | 92% | 54% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 1.7 | |
| 20 | 6 | 83% | 67% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 21 | 9 | 89% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 22 | 14 | 79% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 23 | 13 | 85% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 24 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 25 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 26 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 27 | 9 | 78% | 56% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 28 | 14 | 79% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 29 | 11 | 82% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 30 | 4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 31 | 14 | 64% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 1.1 | |
| 32 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 33 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 34 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 36 | 3 | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.7 | |
| 37 | 11 | 64% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.6 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 39 | 4 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 |
Yellow Cards For
League avg
1.71
Most carded
3.5
Fewest carded
0.5
Yellow Cards For — World Cup - Qualification Asia 2026
Afghanistan leads World Cup - Qualification Asia with an average of 3.50 yellow cards per match across 4 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Singapore (2.83) and Pakistan (2.60) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.98 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Myanmar averages just 0.50 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 4 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The World Cup - Qualification Asia averages 1.74 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Afghanistan, Singapore, Pakistan) averages 2.98 collectively, sitting 1.24 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards Against
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | 100% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 6% | 2.8 | |
| 2 | 13 | 92% | 77% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 2.8 | |
| 3 | 14 | 100% | 79% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2.6 | |
| 4 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 5 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 6 | 17 | 100% | 71% | 47% | 18% | 6% | 2.4 | |
| 7 | 6 | 100% | 83% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 | |
| 8 | 6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 2.2 | |
| 9 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 10 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 13 | 15 | 93% | 53% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 1.9 | |
| 14 | 11 | 91% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 15 | 9 | 100% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 16 | 4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 17 | 13 | 85% | 54% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 18 | 12 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 19 | 8 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 20 | 13 | 85% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 21 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 22 | 14 | 86% | 36% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 23 | 11 | 82% | 45% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 24 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 25 | 9 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 26 | 16 | 63% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 1.3 | |
| 27 | 14 | 79% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 28 | 4 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.3 | |
| 29 | 9 | 78% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 30 | 13 | 85% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1.1 | |
| 31 | 5 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 34 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 35 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 37 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 39 | 3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.3 | |
| 40 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.3 | |
| 41 | 4 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.3 |
Yellow Cards Against
League avg
1.53
Most carded
2.8
Fewest carded
0.3
Yellow Cards Against — World Cup - Qualification Asia 2026
Qatar leads World Cup - Qualification Asia with an average of 2.83 yellow cards conceded per match across 18 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Iraq (2.77) and South Korea (2.64) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.75 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Myanmar averages just 0.25 yellow cards conceded per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 4 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The World Cup - Qualification Asia averages 1.54 yellow cards conceded per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Qatar, Iraq, South Korea) averages 2.75 collectively, sitting 1.21 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.