Virsliga — Failed To Score
Latvia · 2026
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Grobiņa | 30 | 15 | 50% | 53% | 47% |
| 2 |  FS Jelgava | 30 | 13 | 43% | 50% | 38% |
| 3 |  FK Liepaja | 30 | 10 | 33% | 20% | 47% |
| 4 |  Ogre United | 29 | 9 | 31% | 29% | 33% |
| 5 |  BFC Daugavpils | 30 | 9 | 30% | 38% | 21% |
| 6 |  Super Nova | 28 | 6 | 21% | 14% | 29% |
| 7 |  Tukums | 30 | 5 | 17% | 7% | 25% |
| 8 |  Auda | 29 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 9 |  Rīgas FS | 29 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 10 |  Riga | 29 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 8% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grobiņa | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| 2 | FS Jelgava | 14 | 7 | 50% |
| 3 | BFC Daugavpils | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 4 | Ogre United | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 5 | FK Liepaja | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 6 | Super Nova | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 7 | Rīgas FS | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 8 | Auda | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 9 | Tukums | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 10 | Riga | 16 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Liepaja | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 2 | Grobiņa | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| 3 | FS Jelgava | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 4 | Ogre United | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 5 | Super Nova | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 6 | Tukums | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 7 | BFC Daugavpils | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 8 | Riga | 13 | 1 | 8% |
| 9 | Auda | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 10 | Rīgas FS | 15 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Grobiņa fails to score most often in the league — 50%
FS Jelgava is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 43%
FK Liepaja is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 33%
Riga rarely fails to score — 3%
Rīgas FS rarely fails to score — 7%
Auda rarely fails to score — 10%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 10 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 25%
- Home FTS rate: 24%
- Away FTS rate: 26%
Virsliga (Latvia) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Virsliga (Latvia), teams fail to score in 50% of matches this season. Grobiņa fails to score the most, going blank in 50% of their games (15 matches), with 53% at home and 47% away. Riga has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 3% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Latvia
- 1. Liga Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Cup Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Super Cup Failed To Score— Division Silver