Virsliga — Home Advantage
Latvia · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  FK Liepaja | +31% | +40% | +23% | 1.93/0.87 |
| 2 |  Tukums | +23% | +25% | +22% | 1.14/0.25 |
| 3 |  Grobiņa | +23% | +20% | +25% | 1.00/0.67 |
| 4 |  Ogre United | +15% | +14% | +17% | 0.57/0.47 |
| 5 |  BFC Daugavpils | +14% | -4% | +32% | 1.63/0.86 |
| 6 |  Riga | +8% | -1% | +17% | 2.50/2.08 |
| 7 |  Auda | +6% | +12% | 0% | 1.93/2.00 |
| 8 |  Rīgas FS | +3% | +23% | -18% | 2.21/2.80 |
| 9 |  FS Jelgava | -10% | -17% | -2% | 1.00/1.31 |
| 10 |  Super Nova | -11% | +3% | -26% | 0.86/1.64 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Virsliga (Latvia), the average home win rate is 42% compared to 35% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. FK Liepaja shows the strongest home advantage, winning 60% of home games versus just 20% away (a difference of +40%). At the other end, Rīgas FS actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 64% versus 93% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Liepaja | +40% | 1.87 | 0.80 |
| 2 | Tukums | +25% | 1.79 | 1.06 |
| 3 | Rīgas FS | +23% | 3.00 | 1.87 |
| 4 | Grobiņa | +20% | 0.80 | 0.53 |
| 5 | Ogre United | +14% | 1.14 | 0.87 |
| 6 | Auda | +12% | 1.80 | 1.43 |
| 7 | Super Nova | +3% | 1.07 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Riga | -1% | 2.88 | 2.92 |
| 9 | BFC Daugavpils | -4% | 1.13 | 1.21 |
| 10 | FS Jelgava | -17% | 0.93 | 1.31 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FK Liepaja has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 1.87 goals/match at home versus 0.80 away — a Scoring Advantage of +40%. In contrast, FS Jelgava scores more away (1.31/match) than at home (0.93/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -17% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFC Daugavpils | +32% | 0.81 | 1.57 |
| 2 | Grobiņa | +25% | 1.27 | 2.13 |
| 3 | FK Liepaja | +23% | 1.13 | 1.80 |
| 4 | Tukums | +22% | 1.57 | 2.44 |
| 5 | Riga | +17% | 0.88 | 1.23 |
| 6 | Ogre United | +17% | 2.14 | 3.00 |
| 7 | Auda | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | FS Jelgava | -2% | 1.57 | 1.50 |
| 9 | Rīgas FS | -18% | 0.86 | 0.60 |
| 10 | Super Nova | -26% | 1.71 | 1.00 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence Analysis
BFC Daugavpils has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.81 goals/match at home compared to 1.57 away — a Defence Advantage of +32%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Super Nova concedes more at home (1.71/match) than away (1.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Liepaja | +76% | 1.00 | 0.13 |
| 2 | BFC Daugavpils | +40% | 0.50 | 0.21 |
| 3 | Auda | +21% | 0.87 | 0.57 |
| 4 | Ogre United | +18% | 0.57 | 0.40 |
| 5 | Super Nova | +14% | 0.57 | 0.43 |
| 6 | Rīgas FS | +13% | 1.21 | 0.93 |
| 7 | Tukums | +11% | 0.79 | 0.63 |
| 8 | Grobiņa | +11% | 0.33 | 0.27 |
| 9 | Riga | -1% | 1.44 | 1.46 |
| 10 | FS Jelgava | -27% | 0.43 | 0.75 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, FK Liepaja has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.13 away — a Scoring Advantage of +76%. At the other end, FS Jelgava shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.43/match at home against 0.75 away (-27%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFC Daugavpils | +55% | 0.13 | 0.43 |
| 2 | FK Liepaja | +30% | 0.53 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Riga | +24% | 0.38 | 0.62 |
| 4 | Rīgas FS | +24% | 0.29 | 0.47 |
| 5 | Ogre United | +19% | 1.00 | 1.47 |
| 6 | Tukums | +18% | 0.79 | 1.13 |
| 7 | Grobiņa | +13% | 0.67 | 0.87 |
| 8 | FS Jelgava | -1% | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 9 | Auda | -3% | 0.53 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Super Nova | -20% | 0.86 | 0.57 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, BFC Daugavpils has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.13 goals/match at home compared to 0.43 away — a Defence Advantage of +55%. Super Nova struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.86/match at home versus 0.57 away (-20%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tukums | +39% | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| 2 | Rīgas FS | +31% | 1.79 | 0.93 |
| 3 | Grobiņa | +27% | 0.47 | 0.27 |
| 4 | FK Liepaja | +13% | 0.87 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Ogre United | +10% | 0.57 | 0.47 |
| 6 | Auda | +4% | 0.93 | 0.86 |
| 7 | Riga | -1% | 1.44 | 1.46 |
| 8 | FS Jelgava | -6% | 0.50 | 0.56 |
| 9 | Super Nova | -7% | 0.50 | 0.57 |
| 10 | BFC Daugavpils | -23% | 0.63 | 1.00 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Tukums has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.44 away — a Scoring Advantage of +39%. At the other end, BFC Daugavpils shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.63/match at home against 1.00 away (-23%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grobiņa | +36% | 0.60 | 1.27 |
| 2 | Tukums | +25% | 0.79 | 1.31 |
| 3 | BFC Daugavpils | +25% | 0.69 | 1.14 |
| 4 | Ogre United | +15% | 1.14 | 1.53 |
| 5 | FK Liepaja | +14% | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| 6 | Riga | +10% | 0.50 | 0.62 |
| 7 | Auda | +3% | 0.47 | 0.50 |
| 8 | FS Jelgava | -3% | 0.93 | 0.88 |
| 9 | Super Nova | -33% | 0.86 | 0.43 |
| 10 | Rīgas FS | -62% | 0.57 | 0.13 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Grobiņa has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.60 goals/match at home compared to 1.27 away — a Defence Advantage of +36%. Rīgas FS struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.57/match at home versus 0.13 away (-62%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Latvia
- 1. Liga Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver