1. Liga — Home Advantage
Latvia · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Rēzekne FA | +31% | +56% | +5% | 0.55/0.00 |
| 2 |  Riga FC II | +18% | +29% | +7% | 1.82/0.56 |
| 3 |  Metta / LU | +17% | +35% | 0% | 2.70/2.40 |
| 4 |  Tukums II | +15% | -8% | +38% | 0.89/0.40 |
| 5 |  Skanste | +14% | +7% | +22% | 1.60/1.00 |
| 6 |  Rīgas FS II | +13% | +13% | +14% | 0.73/0.78 |
| 7 |  Smiltene | +10% | +19% | +2% | 0.80/0.50 |
| 8 |  JDFS Alberts | +8% | +2% | +14% | 2.00/1.70 |
| 9 |  Super Nova 2 | +6% | -4% | +17% | 1.56/1.00 |
| 10 |  Mārupe | +6% | +14% | -3% | 1.36/1.44 |
| 11 |  Riga Mariners | +5% | +4% | +5% | 2.20/2.20 |
| 12 |  Valmiera / BSS | +3% | -1% | +7% | 2.50/2.58 |
| 13 |  Leevon / PPK | 0% | +19% | -18% | 2.50/2.10 |
| 14 |  JFK Ventspils | -10% | -46% | +25% | 0.33/0.90 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 1. Liga (Latvia), the average home win rate is 45% compared to 36% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Riga FC II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 55% of home games versus just 11% away (a difference of +43%). At the other end, JFK Ventspils actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 20% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rēzekne FA | +56% | 1.18 | 0.33 |
| 2 | Metta / LU | +35% | 5.80 | 2.80 |
| 3 | Riga FC II | +29% | 1.82 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Leevon / PPK | +19% | 2.20 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Smiltene | +19% | 1.60 | 1.10 |
| 6 | Mārupe | +14% | 1.91 | 1.44 |
| 7 | Rīgas FS II | +13% | 1.73 | 1.33 |
| 8 | Skanste | +7% | 2.30 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Riga Mariners | +4% | 2.40 | 2.20 |
| 10 | JDFS Alberts | +2% | 2.10 | 2.00 |
| 11 | Valmiera / BSS | -1% | 2.88 | 2.92 |
| 12 | Super Nova 2 | -4% | 1.33 | 1.45 |
| 13 | Tukums II | -8% | 1.11 | 1.30 |
| 14 | JFK Ventspils | -46% | 0.56 | 1.50 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Rēzekne FA has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 1.18 goals/match at home versus 0.33 away — a Scoring Advantage of +56%. In contrast, JFK Ventspils scores more away (1.50/match) than at home (0.56/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -46% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tukums II | +38% | 1.89 | 4.20 |
| 2 | JFK Ventspils | +25% | 1.56 | 2.60 |
| 3 | Skanste | +22% | 1.60 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Super Nova 2 | +17% | 1.22 | 1.73 |
| 5 | JDFS Alberts | +14% | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| 6 | Rīgas FS II | +14% | 2.45 | 3.22 |
| 7 | Riga FC II | +7% | 1.73 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Valmiera / BSS | +7% | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Rēzekne FA | +5% | 2.91 | 3.22 |
| 10 | Riga Mariners | +5% | 1.00 | 1.10 |
| 11 | Smiltene | +2% | 2.80 | 2.90 |
| 12 | Metta / LU | 0% | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| 13 | Mārupe | -3% | 1.64 | 1.56 |
| 14 | Leevon / PPK | -18% | 1.30 | 0.90 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence Analysis
Tukums II has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 1.89 goals/match at home compared to 4.20 away — a Defence Advantage of +38%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Leevon / PPK concedes more at home (1.30/match) than away (0.90/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rēzekne FA | +61% | 0.45 | 0.11 |
| 2 | Metta / LU | +52% | 3.50 | 1.10 |
| 3 | Riga FC II | +38% | 1.00 | 0.44 |
| 4 | Mārupe | +37% | 0.73 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Super Nova 2 | +24% | 0.89 | 0.55 |
| 6 | Valmiera / BSS | +20% | 1.13 | 0.75 |
| 7 | Leevon / PPK | +18% | 1.00 | 0.70 |
| 8 | Rīgas FS II | +15% | 0.91 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Smiltene | +11% | 0.50 | 0.40 |
| 10 | Skanste | +11% | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 11 | JDFS Alberts | -18% | 0.70 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Riga Mariners | -18% | 0.90 | 1.30 |
| 13 | JFK Ventspils | -46% | 0.33 | 0.90 |
| 14 | Tukums II | -52% | 0.22 | 0.70 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Rēzekne FA has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 0.45 goals/match at home versus 0.11 away — a Scoring Advantage of +61%. At the other end, Tukums II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.22/match at home against 0.70 away (-52%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JDFS Alberts | +50% | 0.30 | 0.90 |
| 2 | Metta / LU | +50% | 0.10 | 0.30 |
| 3 | Tukums II | +44% | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| 4 | Rīgas FS II | +39% | 0.64 | 1.44 |
| 5 | Super Nova 2 | +30% | 0.44 | 0.82 |
| 6 | Rēzekne FA | +29% | 0.73 | 1.33 |
| 7 | Smiltene | +15% | 1.10 | 1.50 |
| 8 | Riga FC II | +10% | 0.73 | 0.89 |
| 9 | JFK Ventspils | +7% | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| 10 | Skanste | -9% | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Mārupe | -19% | 0.82 | 0.56 |
| 12 | Riga Mariners | -20% | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| 13 | Valmiera / BSS | -20% | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| 14 | Leevon / PPK | -25% | 1.00 | 0.60 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, JDFS Alberts has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 0.30 goals/match at home compared to 0.90 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. Leevon / PPK struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.60 away (-25%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rēzekne FA | +53% | 0.73 | 0.22 |
| 2 | Riga Mariners | +25% | 1.50 | 0.90 |
| 3 | Smiltene | +22% | 1.10 | 0.70 |
| 4 | Leevon / PPK | +20% | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| 5 | Tukums II | +19% | 0.89 | 0.60 |
| 6 | Riga FC II | +19% | 0.82 | 0.56 |
| 7 | JDFS Alberts | +17% | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Metta / LU | +15% | 2.30 | 1.70 |
| 9 | Rīgas FS II | +10% | 0.82 | 0.67 |
| 10 | Skanste | +4% | 1.30 | 1.20 |
| 11 | Mārupe | +3% | 1.18 | 1.11 |
| 12 | Valmiera / BSS | -11% | 1.75 | 2.17 |
| 13 | Super Nova 2 | -34% | 0.44 | 0.91 |
| 14 | JFK Ventspils | -46% | 0.22 | 0.60 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Rēzekne FA has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 0.73 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +53%. At the other end, JFK Ventspils shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.22/match at home against 0.60 away (-46%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skanste | +58% | 0.40 | 1.50 |
| 2 | JFK Ventspils | +37% | 0.78 | 1.70 |
| 3 | Tukums II | +29% | 0.89 | 1.60 |
| 4 | Riga Mariners | +27% | 0.40 | 0.70 |
| 5 | Valmiera / BSS | +20% | 0.50 | 0.75 |
| 6 | Mārupe | +10% | 0.82 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Super Nova 2 | +8% | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| 8 | Riga FC II | +5% | 1.00 | 1.11 |
| 9 | Leevon / PPK | 0% | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| 10 | Rīgas FS II | -1% | 1.82 | 1.78 |
| 11 | Rēzekne FA | -7% | 2.18 | 1.89 |
| 12 | Smiltene | -10% | 1.70 | 1.40 |
| 13 | JDFS Alberts | -13% | 0.90 | 0.70 |
| 14 | Metta / LU | -17% | 0.70 | 0.50 |
1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Skanste has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 0.40 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Metta / LU struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.70/match at home versus 0.50 away (-17%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Latvia
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Virsliga Home Advantage— Division Silver