Premier League — Card Stats
England · 2026/27
Yellow Cards — Match Total
| # | Team | MP | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 4.8 | |
| 2 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 4.6 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 4.6 | |
| 4 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 4.4 | |
| 5 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 4.4 | |
| 6 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 4.4 | |
| 7 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 4.2 | |
| 8 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 4.2 | |
| 9 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 4.2 | |
| 10 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 11 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 3.8 | |
| 12 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 3.8 | |
| 13 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 | |
| 14 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 3.4 | |
| 15 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 3.4 | |
| 16 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 17 | 5 | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 18 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 19 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 20 | 5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 |
Yellow Cards — Match Total
League avg
3.72
Most carded
Newcastle4.8
Fewest carded
Fulham2.2
Yellow Cards per Match in Premier League 2026
Newcastle leads Premier League with an average of 4.80 yellow cards per match across 5 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Arsenal (4.60) and Chelsea (4.60) follow closely, with the trio averaging 4.67 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Fulham averages just 2.20 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Premier League averages 3.72 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Newcastle, Arsenal, Chelsea) averages 4.67 collectively, sitting 0.95 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards For
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 3.4 | |
| 2 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 2.8 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 2.6 | |
| 4 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 5 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 6 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 2.4 | |
| 7 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 2.2 | |
| 8 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 9 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 10 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 11 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 12 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 13 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 14 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 15 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 16 | 5 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 17 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 18 | 5 | 80% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 19 | 5 | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 20 | 5 | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 |
Yellow Cards For
League avg
1.86
Most carded
Hull City3.4
Fewest carded
Coventry0.8
Yellow Cards For — Premier League 2026
Hull City leads Premier League with an average of 3.40 yellow cards per match across 5 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Bournemouth (2.80) and Nottingham Forest (2.60) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.93 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Coventry averages just 0.80 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Premier League averages 1.86 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Hull City, Bournemouth, Nottingham Forest) averages 2.93 collectively, sitting 1.07 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards Against
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 0% | 3.2 | |
| 2 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 2.8 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 4 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 | |
| 5 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 6 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 2.2 | |
| 7 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 8 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 2.0 | |
| 9 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 10 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 11 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 12 | 5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 1.6 | |
| 13 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 14 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 15 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 16 | 5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 17 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 18 | 5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.4 | |
| 19 | 5 | 80% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 | |
| 20 | 5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0.6 |
Yellow Cards Against
League avg
1.86
Most carded
Arsenal3.2
Fewest carded
Fulham0.6
Yellow Cards Against — Premier League 2026
Arsenal leads Premier League with an average of 3.20 yellow cards conceded per match across 5 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Chelsea (2.80) and Leeds (2.80) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.93 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Fulham averages just 0.60 yellow cards conceded per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Premier League averages 1.86 yellow cards conceded per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Arsenal, Chelsea, Leeds) averages 2.93 collectively, sitting 1.07 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.