WSL Cup — Form Table
England · 2026/27
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Manchester United W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2 | +13 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 7.50 | 100% | 100% | 8.50 | |
| 2 |  Aston Villa W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.50 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 3 |  Crystal Palace W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 4 |  Liverpool W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.50 | |
| 5 |  London City Lionesses W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 6 |  West Ham W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 7 |  Tottenham Hotspur W | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 8 |  Brighton W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 9 |  Everton W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 10 |  Ipswich Town W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 11 |  Watford W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 12 |  Sunderland W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 13 |  Newcastle United W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 14 |  Southampton W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 15 |  Leicester City FC W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 16 |  Nottingham Forest W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 17 |  Birmingham City W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 100% | 50% | 4.50 | |
| 18 |  Durham W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 19 |  Charlton Athletic W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 20 |  Sheffield United W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Manchester United W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Aston Villa W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Crystal Palace W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Sheffield United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Charlton Athletic W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Durham W has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 20 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 47%
- •Teams score an average of 1.80 goals per game and concede 1.80 — a combined 3.60 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 40% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 33% of games.
WSL Cup (England) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Manchester United W, Aston Villa W and Crystal Palace W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 1.80 goals and concede 1.80 per game — a combined 3.60 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 40% of fixtures while 33% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Sheffield United W and Charlton Athletic W have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crystal Palace W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 2 | Manchester United W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 10.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 | |
| 3 | Brighton W | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 4 | Liverpool W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 5 | West Ham W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 6 | Aston Villa W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 7 | Everton W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 8 | Tottenham Hotspur W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 9 | Birmingham City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 10 | Ipswich Town W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 11 | Leicester City FC W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Nottingham Forest W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | Durham W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Crystal Palace W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Manchester United W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Liverpool W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Durham W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Nottingham Forest W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Leicester City FC W has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 13 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 53%
- •Teams score an average of 2.27 goals per game and concede 1.33 — a combined 3.60 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 40% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 33% of games.
WSL Cup (England) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Crystal Palace W, Manchester United W and Liverpool W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 2.27 goals and concede 1.33 per game — a combined 3.60 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 40% of fixtures while 33% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Durham W and Nottingham Forest W have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | London City Lionesses W | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 2 | Manchester United W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 5.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 3 | Aston Villa W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 4 | Liverpool W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 5 | Tottenham Hotspur W | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 6 | West Ham W | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 7 | Watford W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 8 | Sunderland W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 9 | Newcastle United W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 10 | Southampton W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 11 | Birmingham City W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Charlton Athletic W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | LL | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.50 | |
| 13 | Sheffield United W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | -9 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 11.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
London City Lionesses W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Manchester United W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Aston Villa W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 100% and 3.00 PPG.
Sheffield United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Charlton Athletic W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Birmingham City W has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.00 PPG.
- •The WSL Cup (England) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 13 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the WSL Cup in this period is 40%
- •Teams score an average of 1.33 goals per game and concede 2.27 — a combined 3.60 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 40% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 33% of games.
WSL Cup (England) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
London City Lionesses W, Manchester United W and Aston Villa W have been the standout performers in the WSL Cup (England) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 3.00 and 3.00 PPG respectively. Across the WSL Cup, teams score an average of 1.33 goals and concede 2.27 per game — a combined 3.60 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 40% of fixtures while 33% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Sheffield United W and Charlton Athletic W have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.00 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the WSL Cup.
Form Tables — England
- Championship Form Table— Division Premium
- Community Shield Form Table— Division Elite
- Community Shield Women Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- EFL Trophy Form Table— Division Gold
- FA Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- FA Trophy Form Table— Division Pro
- FA WSL Form Table— Division Women's Elite
- FA Women's Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- FA Youth Cup Form Table— Division Academy
- League Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- League One Form Table— Division Gold
- League Two Form Table— Division Gold
- National League Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - North Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - North - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League - South Form Table— Division Pro
- National League - South - Play-offs Form Table— Division Underground
- National League Cup Form Table— Division Underground
- Non League Div One - Isthmian North Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Isthmian South Central Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Isthmian South East Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern East Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern Midlands Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Northern West Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Play-offs Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Southern Central Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Div One - Southern South Form Table— Division Amateur
- Non League Premier - Isthmian Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Isthmian - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Northern Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Northern - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern Central Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern Central - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern South Form Table— Division Regional
- Non League Premier - Southern South - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- Premier League Form Table— Division Elite
- Premier League - Summer Series Form Table— Division Underground
- Premier League 2 Division One Form Table— Division Academy
- Premier League Cup Form Table— Division Academy
- Professional Development League Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - Championship Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - North Form Table— Division Academy
- U18 Premier League - South Form Table— Division Academy
- Women's Championship Form Table— Division Women's Elite