MLS Next Pro — Porte Inviolate
USA · 2026
USA — MLS Next Pro 2026 — Statistiche Dettagliate
Competizione
Porta Inviolata
| # | Team | PG | PI | % PI | PI Casa | PI Trasferta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Portland Timbers II | 30 | 15 | 50% | 7 | 8 |
| 2 |  Austin II | 30 | 15 | 50% | 6 | 9 |
| 3 |  Huntsville City | 28 | 9 | 32% | 6 | 3 |
| 4 |  Houston Dynamo FC II | 29 | 9 | 31% | 6 | 3 |
| 5 |  Ventura County | 31 | 9 | 29% | 4 | 5 |
| 6 |  St. Louis City II | 29 | 8 | 28% | 4 | 4 |
| 7 |  Crown Legacy | 30 | 8 | 27% | 6 | 2 |
| 8 |  Chattanooga | 31 | 8 | 26% | 6 | 2 |
| 9 |  New England II | 29 | 7 | 24% | 4 | 3 |
| 10 |  Minnesota United II | 29 | 7 | 24% | 4 | 3 |
| 11 |  New York City II | 29 | 7 | 24% | 4 | 3 |
| 12 |  Tacoma Defiance | 28 | 6 | 21% | 4 | 2 |
| 13 |  Carolina Core | 28 | 6 | 21% | 4 | 2 |
| 14 |  Los Angeles FC II | 31 | 6 | 19% | 3 | 3 |
| 15 |  Philadelphia Union II | 28 | 5 | 18% | 4 | 1 |
| 16 |  Toronto II | 28 | 5 | 18% | 2 | 3 |
| 17 |  Chicago Fire II | 28 | 5 | 18% | 4 | 1 |
| 18 |  North Texas | 28 | 5 | 18% | 3 | 2 |
| 19 |  The Town | 29 | 5 | 17% | 3 | 2 |
| 20 |  Columbus Crew II | 31 | 5 | 16% | 4 | 1 |
| 21 |  Atlanta United II | 29 | 4 | 14% | 2 | 2 |
| 22 |  Real Monarchs | 28 | 4 | 14% | 3 | 1 |
| 23 |  Connecticut FC | 30 | 4 | 13% | 2 | 2 |
| 24 |  Colorado Rapids II | 28 | 3 | 11% | 3 | 0 |
| 25 |  FC Cincinnati II | 28 | 3 | 11% | 3 | 0 |
| 26 |  New York RB II | 29 | 3 | 10% | 3 | 0 |
| 27 |  Vancouver Whitecaps II | 28 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 2 |
| 28 |  Sporting KC II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 1 | 0 |
| 29 |  Orlando City II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 1 |
| 30 |  Inter Miami II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 1 | 0 |
Casa / Porta Inviolata
| # | Team | PG | PI | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Portland Timbers II | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 2 | Huntsville City | 14 | 6 | 43% |
| 3 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 15 | 6 | 40% |
| 4 | Austin II | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 5 | Crown Legacy | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 6 | Chattanooga | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 7 | Philadelphia Union II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 8 | Tacoma Defiance | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 9 | Chicago Fire II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 10 | New England II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 11 | St. Louis City II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 12 | Minnesota United II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 13 | New York City II | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 14 | Carolina Core | 14 | 4 | 29% |
| 15 | Columbus Crew II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 16 | Ventura County | 16 | 4 | 25% |
| 17 | New York RB II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 18 | Real Monarchs | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 19 | Colorado Rapids II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 20 | North Texas | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 21 | FC Cincinnati II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 22 | The Town | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 23 | Los Angeles FC II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 24 | Toronto II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 25 | Connecticut FC | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 26 | Atlanta United II | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 28 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 29 | Orlando City II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
Trasferta / Porta Inviolata
| # | Team | PG | PI | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin II | 14 | 9 | 64% |
| 2 | Portland Timbers II | 14 | 8 | 57% |
| 3 | Ventura County | 15 | 5 | 33% |
| 4 | St. Louis City II | 15 | 4 | 27% |
| 5 | Toronto II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 6 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 7 | Huntsville City | 14 | 3 | 21% |
| 8 | New England II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 9 | Minnesota United II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 10 | New York City II | 15 | 3 | 20% |
| 11 | Los Angeles FC II | 17 | 3 | 18% |
| 12 | Atlanta United II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 13 | Tacoma Defiance | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 14 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 15 | Chattanooga | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 16 | North Texas | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 17 | Crown Legacy | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 18 | Carolina Core | 14 | 2 | 14% |
| 19 | The Town | 15 | 2 | 13% |
| 20 | Connecticut FC | 16 | 2 | 13% |
| 21 | Philadelphia Union II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 22 | Real Monarchs | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 23 | Orlando City II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 24 | Chicago Fire II | 14 | 1 | 7% |
| 25 | Columbus Crew II | 16 | 1 | 6% |
| 26 | New York RB II | 15 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 | Colorado Rapids II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | FC Cincinnati II | 14 | 0 | 0% |
Quali squadre mantengono più porte inviolate?
Portland Timbers II ha più porte inviolate della lega — 50%
Austin II è #2 per porte inviolate — 50%
Huntsville City è #3 per porte inviolate — 32%
Inter Miami II mantiene meno porte inviolate — 4%
Orlando City II mantiene meno porte inviolate — 4%
Sporting KC II mantiene meno porte inviolate — 4%
Stats Porte Inviolate
- ha 30 squadre
- Tasso porte inviolate della lega: 20%
- Tasso PI in casa: 24%
- Tasso PI in trasferta: 16%
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Analisi Porta Inviolata
Nella MLS Next Pro (USA), il 41% delle partite termina con la porta inviolata per una delle squadre. Il Portland Timbers II guida con 15 porte inviolate (50% delle loro partite), di cui 7 in casa e 8 fuori.
Angolo Scommesse — Mercati Porta Inviolata
I dati sulla porta inviolata sono essenziali per i mercati Entrambe Non Segnano, Under 0.5 e Clean Sheet. Le squadre con alta % CS in casa ma bassa fuori sono candidati ideali per il BTTS No in casa.
Tabelle Statistiche — USA
- MLS All-Star Porte Inviolate— Divisione Underground
- Major League Soccer Porte Inviolate— Divisione Premium
- NISA Porte Inviolate— Divisione Underground
- NPSL Porte Inviolate— Divisione Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Porte Inviolate— Divisione Gold
- USL Championship Porte Inviolate— Divisione Pro
- USL League One Porte Inviolate— Divisione Pro
- USL League One Cup Porte Inviolate— Divisione SemiPro
- USL League Two Porte Inviolate— Divisione SemiPro
- USL Super League Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Pro
- USL W League Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Pro
- WPSL Porte Inviolate— Divisione Women's Pro