NPSL — Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
USA · 2025
USA — NPSL 2025 — Estatísticas Detalhadas
Mais Vitórias:Flower City Union (86%)
Mais Empates:Duluth (80%)
Mais Derrotas:SI Guardians (100%)Média Vitórias:36%Geral / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | V - E - D (HT) | % Vitórias | % Empates | % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flower City Union | 7 | 6-1-0 | 86% | 14% | 0% |
| 2 |  Michigan Rangers | 8 | 6-1-1 | 75% | 13% | 13% |
| 3 |  West Chester United | 7 | 5-2-0 | 71% | 29% | 0% |
| 4 |  FC Pride | 7 | 5-2-0 | 71% | 29% | 0% |
| 5 |  Naples United | 7 | 5-0-2 | 71% | 0% | 29% |
| 6 |  Jacksonville Armada II | 9 | 6-2-1 | 67% | 22% | 11% |
| 7 |  Alexandria Reds | 9 | 6-2-1 | 67% | 22% | 11% |
| 8 |  Club De Lyon | 9 | 6-2-1 | 67% | 22% | 11% |
| 9 |  Hickory | 6 | 4-2-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 10 |  Ambassadors Ohio | 6 | 4-1-1 | 67% | 17% | 17% |
| 11 |  New Jersey United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 12 |  El Farolito | 8 | 5-3-0 | 63% | 38% | 0% |
| 13 |  Ristozi | 8 | 5-2-1 | 63% | 25% | 13% |
| 14 |  Virginia Dream | 8 | 5-2-1 | 63% | 25% | 13% |
| 15 |  Oklahoma United | 8 | 5-1-2 | 63% | 13% | 25% |
| 16 |  Philadelphia Union | 8 | 5-0-3 | 63% | 0% | 38% |
| 17 |  Milwaukee Torrent | 8 | 5-0-3 | 63% | 0% | 38% |
| 18 |  Hartford City | 7 | 4-2-1 | 57% | 29% | 14% |
| 19 |  Erie Commodores | 7 | 4-1-2 | 57% | 14% | 29% |
| 20 |  West Texas | 9 | 5-3-1 | 56% | 33% | 11% |
| 21 |  Fort Worth Vaqueros | 9 | 5-1-3 | 56% | 11% | 33% |
| 22 |  Appalachian | 6 | 3-3-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 23 |  Bristol Rhythm | 6 | 3-1-2 | 50% | 17% | 33% |
| 24 |  Sacramento Gold | 9 | 4-3-2 | 44% | 33% | 22% |
| 25 |  Siouxland United | 9 | 4-3-2 | 44% | 33% | 22% |
| 26 |  DMV Elite | 9 | 4-2-3 | 44% | 22% | 33% |
| 27 |  Grove Soccer United | 7 | 3-3-1 | 43% | 43% | 14% |
| 28 |  Port City NC | 7 | 3-2-2 | 43% | 29% | 29% |
| 29 |  Brownsville | 10 | 4-4-2 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 30 |  Joy | 10 | 4-4-2 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 31 |  Gio's Lions | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 32 |  District Elite | 8 | 3-0-5 | 38% | 0% | 63% |
| 33 |  Oakland Stompers | 9 | 3-4-2 | 33% | 44% | 22% |
| 34 |  Osner’s | 6 | 2-3-1 | 33% | 50% | 17% |
| 35 |  PDA | 6 | 2-3-1 | 33% | 50% | 17% |
| 36 |  Buffalo Stallions | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 |  Rochester New York II | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 |  New Haven United | 6 | 2-2-2 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 39 |  FC Florida | 6 | 2-1-3 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 40 |  Virginia Beach City | 6 | 2-1-3 | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| 41 |  Jackson Lions | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 42 |  Lubbock Matadors | 10 | 3-4-3 | 30% | 40% | 30% |
| 43 |  Des Moines United | 10 | 3-3-4 | 30% | 30% | 40% |
| 44 |  California Odyssey | 10 | 3-2-5 | 30% | 20% | 50% |
| 45 |  FC Motown | 7 | 2-5-0 | 29% | 71% | 0% |
| 46 |  Electric City Shock | 7 | 2-3-2 | 29% | 43% | 29% |
| 47 |  Miami Dutch Lions | 8 | 2-1-5 | 25% | 13% | 63% |
| 48 |  PSC Florida | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 49 |  Arkansas Wolves | 9 | 2-3-4 | 22% | 33% | 44% |
| 50 |  Sioux Falls Thunder | 9 | 2-2-5 | 22% | 22% | 56% |
| 51 |  Burlington United | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 52 |  Syracuse FC | 5 | 1-1-3 | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 53 |  New York Shockers | 5 | 1-0-4 | 20% | 0% | 80% |
| 54 |  American SC New York | 6 | 1-3-2 | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 55 |  Pennsylvania Classics | 6 | 1-3-2 | 17% | 50% | 33% |
| 56 |  New Orleans Jesters | 6 | 1-2-3 | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 57 |  Greenville United | 6 | 1-2-3 | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 58 |  San Leandro United | 6 | 1-2-3 | 17% | 33% | 50% |
| 59 |  Cleveland SC | 6 | 1-0-5 | 17% | 0% | 83% |
| 60 |  Cruizers | 7 | 1-4-2 | 14% | 57% | 29% |
| 61 |  865 Alliance | 7 | 1-2-4 | 14% | 29% | 57% |
| 62 |  Charlottetowne Hops | 7 | 1-2-4 | 14% | 29% | 57% |
| 63 |  Real San Jose | 7 | 1-2-4 | 14% | 29% | 57% |
| 64 |  Global Soccer Pathways | 7 | 1-0-6 | 14% | 0% | 86% |
| 65 |  Minnesota Blizzard | 8 | 1-6-1 | 13% | 75% | 13% |
| 66 |  FC Frederick | 8 | 1-2-5 | 13% | 25% | 63% |
| 67 |  Wisconsin Conquerors | 8 | 1-1-6 | 13% | 13% | 75% |
| 68 | Duluth | 10 | 1-8-1 | 10% | 80% | 10% |
| 69 |  Philadelphia Union III | 5 | 0-3-2 | 0% | 60% | 40% |
| 70 |  Niagara 1812 | 7 | 0-2-5 | 0% | 29% | 71% |
| 71 |  WC Predators | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 72 | SI Guardians | 6 | 0-0-6 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 73 |  CF10 Houston | 9 | 0-0-9 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 74 |  AV Rough Diamonds | 9 | 0-0-9 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 75 |  Hershey | 6 | 0-0-6 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
NPSL 2025 — Ganhar & Perder ao Intervalo
Flower City Union lidera a NPSL em vitórias ao intervalo geral com uma taxa de vitória de 86% (6V-1E-0D em 7 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 36%.
Duluth empata mais ao intervalo (80%), enquanto SI Guardians vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:Flower City Union (100%)Mais Empates:Pennsylvania Classics (100%)Mais Derrotas:AV Rough Diamonds (100%)Média Vitórias:39%Casa / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Casa V - E - D (HT) | Casa % Vitórias | Casa % Empates | Casa % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flower City Union | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Ambassadors Ohio | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | FC Pride | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Appalachian | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Oklahoma United | 5 | 4-0-1 | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 6 | Virginia Dream | 5 | 4-0-1 | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 7 | Ristozi | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 8 | Erie Commodores | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 | Fort Worth Vaqueros | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 10 | Naples United | 4 | 3-0-1 | 75% | 0% | 25% |
| 11 | Michigan Rangers | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 12 | West Chester United | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 13 | El Farolito | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 14 | Bristol Rhythm | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 15 | Hartford City | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 16 | Port City NC | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 17 | Grove Soccer United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 18 | Electric City Shock | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 19 | Brownsville | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 20 | Sacramento Gold | 5 | 3-1-1 | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 21 | Philadelphia Union | 5 | 3-0-2 | 60% | 0% | 40% |
| 22 | Jacksonville Armada II | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 23 | DMV Elite | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 24 | West Texas | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 25 | Club De Lyon | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 26 | Hickory | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 27 | San Leandro United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 28 | Rochester New York II | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 29 | Jackson Lions | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 30 | PSC Florida | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 31 | Arkansas Wolves | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 32 | Alexandria Reds | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 33 | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 34 | Des Moines United | 5 | 2-1-2 | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 35 | Milwaukee Torrent | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 36 | Greenville United | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 37 | FC Motown | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 38 | Burlington United | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 39 | New Haven United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 40 | New York Shockers | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 41 | District Elite | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 42 | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 43 | Siouxland United | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 44 | Buffalo Stallions | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 45 | Real San Jose | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 46 | Osner’s | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 47 | PDA | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 48 | Wisconsin Conquerors | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 49 | Charlottetowne Hops | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 50 | Virginia Beach City | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 51 | FC Florida | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 52 | Oakland Stompers | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 53 | Cleveland SC | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 54 | Miami Dutch Lions | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 55 | Gio's Lions | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 56 | Minnesota Blizzard | 5 | 1-4-0 | 20% | 80% | 0% |
| 57 | Duluth | 5 | 1-3-1 | 20% | 60% | 20% |
| 58 | Cruizers | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 59 | California Odyssey | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 60 | Joy | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 61 | 865 Alliance | 5 | 1-1-3 | 20% | 20% | 60% |
| 62 | Pennsylvania Classics | 3 | 0-3-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 63 | FC Frederick | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 64 | Philadelphia Union III | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 65 | Sioux Falls Thunder | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 66 | WC Predators | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 67 | Niagara 1812 | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 68 | American SC New York | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 69 | AV Rough Diamonds | 5 | 0-0-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 70 | New Jersey United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 71 | Hershey | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 72 | CF10 Houston | 4 | 0-0-4 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 73 | Global Soccer Pathways | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 74 | Syracuse FC | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 75 | SI Guardians | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
NPSL 2025 — Resultados ao Intervalo em Casa
Flower City Union lidera a NPSL em vitórias ao intervalo em casa com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (3V-0E-0D em 3 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 39%.
Pennsylvania Classics empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto AV Rough Diamonds vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:Alexandria Reds (100%)Mais Empates:Duluth (100%)Mais Derrotas:CF10 Houston (100%)Média Vitórias:33%Fora / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Fora V - E - D (HT) | Fora % Vitórias | Fora % Empates | Fora % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexandria Reds | 4 | 4-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Milwaukee Torrent | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | New Jersey United | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Gio's Lions | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Club De Lyon | 5 | 4-1-0 | 80% | 20% | 0% |
| 6 | Michigan Rangers | 5 | 4-0-1 | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 7 | Jacksonville Armada II | 5 | 4-0-1 | 80% | 0% | 20% |
| 8 | West Chester United | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 | Hickory | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 10 | Flower City Union | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 11 | Naples United | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 12 | Philadelphia Union | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 13 | Joy | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 14 | FC Pride | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 15 | El Farolito | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 16 | West Texas | 5 | 3-2-0 | 60% | 40% | 0% |
| 17 | Siouxland United | 5 | 3-1-1 | 60% | 20% | 20% |
| 18 | Ristozi | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 19 | Hartford City | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 20 | PDA | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 21 | Osner’s | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 22 | Buffalo Stallions | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 23 | FC Florida | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 24 | Virginia Beach City | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 25 | Oakland Stompers | 5 | 2-3-0 | 40% | 60% | 0% |
| 26 | Sioux Falls Thunder | 5 | 2-1-2 | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 27 | DMV Elite | 5 | 2-1-2 | 40% | 20% | 40% |
| 28 | Fort Worth Vaqueros | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 29 | District Elite | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 30 | California Odyssey | 5 | 2-0-3 | 40% | 0% | 60% |
| 31 | Virginia Dream | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 32 | Oklahoma United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 | New Haven United | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 34 | Ambassadors Ohio | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 35 | Syracuse FC | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 36 | Pennsylvania Classics | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 37 | Bristol Rhythm | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 38 | Erie Commodores | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 39 | FC Motown | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 40 | Appalachian | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 41 | Grove Soccer United | 4 | 1-3-0 | 25% | 75% | 0% |
| 42 | Sacramento Gold | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 43 | Port City NC | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 44 | American SC New York | 4 | 1-2-1 | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| 45 | Miami Dutch Lions | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 46 | Rochester New York II | 4 | 1-1-2 | 25% | 25% | 50% |
| 47 | Global Soccer Pathways | 4 | 1-0-3 | 25% | 0% | 75% |
| 48 | Lubbock Matadors | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 49 | Brownsville | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 50 | Des Moines United | 5 | 1-2-2 | 20% | 40% | 40% |
| 51 | FC Frederick | 5 | 1-0-4 | 20% | 0% | 80% |
| 52 | Duluth | 5 | 0-5-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 53 | Electric City Shock | 4 | 0-3-1 | 0% | 75% | 25% |
| 54 | Minnesota Blizzard | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 55 | Cruizers | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 56 | New Orleans Jesters | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 57 | Philadelphia Union III | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 58 | 865 Alliance | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 59 | Charlottetowne Hops | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0% | 33% | 67% |
| 60 | Arkansas Wolves | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 61 | Jackson Lions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 62 | San Leandro United | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 63 | Niagara 1812 | 4 | 0-1-3 | 0% | 25% | 75% |
| 64 | CF10 Houston | 5 | 0-0-5 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 65 | Greenville United | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 66 | New York Shockers | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 67 | AV Rough Diamonds | 4 | 0-0-4 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 68 | WC Predators | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 69 | Real San Jose | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 70 | Cleveland SC | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 71 | Wisconsin Conquerors | 4 | 0-0-4 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 72 | PSC Florida | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 73 | Hershey | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 74 | Burlington United | 2 | 0-0-2 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 75 | SI Guardians | 3 | 0-0-3 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
NPSL 2025 — Resultados ao Intervalo Fora
Alexandria Reds lidera a NPSL em vitórias ao intervalo fora com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (4V-0E-0D em 4 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 33%.
Duluth empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto CF10 Houston vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.