US Open Cup — Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
USA · 2026
USA — US Open Cup 2026 — Estatísticas Detalhadas
Mais Vitórias:Louisville City (75%)
Mais Empates:New England Revolution (100%)
Mais Derrotas:Vistula (100%)Média Vitórias:24%Geral / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | V - E - D (HT) | % Vitórias | % Empates | % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville City | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 2 |  Colorado Springs | 4 | 3-1-0 | 75% | 25% | 0% |
| 3 |  Houston Dynamo | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 4 |  New York City FC | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |  Rhode Island | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 |  Phoenix Rising | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 |  San Jose Earthquakes | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 |  Naples | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 9 |  Columbus Crew | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 |  Orlando City SC | 4 | 2-2-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 11 |  Colorado Rapids | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 12 |  St. Louis City | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 13 |  One Knoxville | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 14 |  Vermont Green | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 15 |  Chicago Fire | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 16 |  Indy Eleven | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 17 |  Loudoun United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 18 |  San Antonio | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 |  Spokane Velocity | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 |  Hartford Athletic | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 |  New York Red Bulls | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 |  Flint City Bucks | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 23 |  Charlotte | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 24 |  Orange County SC | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 25 |  Charleston Battery | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 26 |  Tennessee Tempo | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 27 |  Lexington | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 28 |  Chattanooga | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 29 |  Sacramento Republic | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 30 |  FC Tulsa | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 31 |  El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 32 |  Westchester SC | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 33 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 34 |  Richmond Kickers | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 35 |  Atlanta United FC | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 36 |  Detroit City | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 37 |  Union Omaha | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 38 |  Charlotte Independence | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 39 | New England Revolution | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 40 |  Virginia Dream | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 41 |  Kalonji | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 42 |  Minnesota United FC | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 43 |  Ristozi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 44 |  Cruizers | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 45 |  Asheville City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 |  Michigan Rangers | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 47 |  DC United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 48 |  Alta | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 49 |  New Mexico United | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 50 |  El Farolito | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 51 |  Carolina Core | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 52 |  Laredo Heat | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 53 |  Greenville Triumph | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 54 |  Valley 559 FC | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 55 | Vistula | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 56 |  Sporting Kansas City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 57 |  Des Moines Menace | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 58 |  Evergreen | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 59 |  Ventura County Fusion | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 60 |  Chattanooga Red Wolves | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 61 |  FC Motown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 62 |  Forward Madison | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 63 |  Little Rock Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 64 |  West Chester United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 65 |  Azteca | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 66 |  Red Force | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 67 |  Austin | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 68 |  New Stars | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 69 |  Flower City Union | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 70 |  America CFL Spurs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 71 |  Steel City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 72 |  San Ramon | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 73 |  Portland Hearts of Pine | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 74 |  Faialense | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 75 |  Laguna United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 76 |  NY Renegades | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 77 |  Southern Indiana | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 78 |  BOHFS St. Louis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 79 |  Florida Badgers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
US Open Cup 2026 — Ganhar & Perder ao Intervalo
Louisville City lidera a US Open Cup em vitórias ao intervalo geral com uma taxa de vitória de 75% (3V-1E-0D em 4 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 24%.
New England Revolution empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Vistula vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:Colorado Springs (100%)Mais Empates:Sacramento Republic (100%)Mais Derrotas:Ventura County Fusion (100%)Média Vitórias:39%Casa / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Casa V - E - D (HT) | Casa % Vitórias | Casa % Empates | Casa % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | San Jose Earthquakes | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Rhode Island | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Louisville City | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Tennessee Tempo | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Charleston Battery | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Naples | 3 | 2-0-1 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| 10 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 11 | Charlotte Independence | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 12 | San Antonio | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 13 | Indy Eleven | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 14 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 15 | Vermont Green | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 16 | Houston Dynamo | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 17 | St. Louis City | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 18 | New York Red Bulls | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 19 | Orange County SC | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | Flint City Bucks | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 | Charlotte | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | Lexington | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 23 | Westchester SC | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 24 | Chattanooga | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 25 | Columbus Crew | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 26 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 27 | Sacramento Republic | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 28 | New England Revolution | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 | New Mexico United | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 30 | DC United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 31 | Laredo Heat | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 32 | Carolina Core | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 33 | Detroit City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 34 | Alta | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 35 | Asheville City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 36 | Chicago Fire | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 37 | Ventura County Fusion | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 38 | Little Rock Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 39 | West Chester United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 40 | Valley 559 FC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 41 | Vistula | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 42 | BOHFS St. Louis | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 43 | FC Motown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
US Open Cup 2026 — Resultados ao Intervalo em Casa
Colorado Springs lidera a US Open Cup em vitórias ao intervalo em casa com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (3V-0E-0D em 3 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 39%.
Sacramento Republic empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Ventura County Fusion vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:Sacramento Republic (100%)Mais Empates:Virginia Dream (100%)Mais Derrotas:Southern Indiana (100%)Média Vitórias:20%Fora / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Fora V - E - D (HT) | Fora % Vitórias | Fora % Empates | Fora % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacramento Republic | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Detroit City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Houston Dynamo | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Columbus Crew | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | New York City FC | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 7 | One Knoxville | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 8 | Loudoun United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | St. Louis City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 | Louisville City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 11 | Phoenix Rising | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 | Spokane Velocity | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 14 | Orlando City SC | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 15 | Union Omaha | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 16 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 17 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 18 | Atlanta United FC | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 19 | Virginia Dream | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 | Ristozi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 21 | Minnesota United FC | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 22 | Kalonji | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | El Farolito | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Valley 559 FC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 25 | Westchester SC | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 26 | Greenville Triumph | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 27 | Michigan Rangers | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 28 | Rhode Island | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 | Cruizers | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 30 | Colorado Springs | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 31 | Southern Indiana | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | Sporting Kansas City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | Charleston Battery | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 34 | Charlotte Independence | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 35 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 36 | Des Moines Menace | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 37 | Evergreen | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 38 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 39 | Forward Madison | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 40 | Azteca | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 41 | Red Force | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 42 | Austin | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 43 | New Stars | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | Flower City Union | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 45 | America CFL Spurs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 46 | Steel City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 47 | San Ramon | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 48 | Portland Hearts of Pine | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 49 | Faialense | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 50 | Laguna United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 51 | NY Renegades | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 52 | San Jose Earthquakes | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 53 | Florida Badgers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 54 | Tennessee Tempo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
US Open Cup 2026 — Resultados ao Intervalo Fora
Sacramento Republic lidera a US Open Cup em vitórias ao intervalo fora com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (1V-0E-0D em 1 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 20%.
Virginia Dream empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Southern Indiana vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.