FA Cup — Formtabelle
China · 2026/27
Kombinierte Formtabelle — Last 7
| # ▴ | Verein | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 10 | WWDWL | 2.00 | 20% | 0% | 80% | 2.00 | 100% | 60% | 3.20 | |
| 2 |  Beijing Guoan | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.33 | 100% | 100% | 3.33 | |
| 3 |  Dalian Kewei | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 75% | 50% | 2.25 | |
| 4 |  SHANGHAI SIPG | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.00 | 100% | 67% | 2.67 | |
| 5 |  Yunnan Yukun | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 2.67 | 67% | 67% | 4.33 | |
| 6 |  Langfang Glory City | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 7 | WWD | 2.33 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 1.67 | |
| 7 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | WWD | 2.33 | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0.67 | 0% | 0% | 0.67 | |
| 8 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 3.00 | 100% | 33% | 3.67 | |
| 9 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.67 | |
| 10 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 1.67 | |
| 11 |  Shanghai Second | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | |
| 12 |  Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.67 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 | |
| 13 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 5 | WDD | 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 1.33 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 14 |  Dalian Zhixing | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 0% | 1.67 | |
| 15 |  Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 16 |  Shandong Luneng | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 2.33 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 17 |  Wuxi Wugou | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 18 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 19 |  Henan Jianye | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 20 |  Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | |
| 21 |  Shaanxi Union | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 22 |  Ningbo Professional | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 23 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 4.00 | |
| 24 |  Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 25 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 26 |  Yulin Miners | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 27 |  Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 28 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 29 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | |
| 30 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 31 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 32 |  Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 33 |  BIT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 34 |  Changchun Yatai | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 35 |  Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 36 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 37 |  Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 38 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 39 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 40 |  Hebei Kungfu | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 41 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 42 |  Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 43 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 44 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 45 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 46 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 47 |  Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 48 |  Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 49 |  Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 50 |  Nanjing City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 51 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 52 |  Dongguan United | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 53 |  Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 54 |  Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 55 |  Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 56 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 57 |  Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 58 |  Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 59 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 60 |  Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 61 |  Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 62 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 63 |  Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 64 |  Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 |
MP = Spiele · W = Siege · D = Unentschieden · L = Niederlagen · GF = Tore · GA = Gegentore · GD = Tordifferenz · Pts = Punkte · Form = Letzte 5 Spiele · PPG = Punkte pro Spiel · CS = Zu-Null-Spiele % · FTS = Ohne Tor · BTTS = Beide Teams treffen % · GF/g = Erzielte Tore pro Spiel · 1.5+ = Über 1,5 Tore % · 2.5+ = Über 2,5 Tore % · AVG = Durchschnittliche Tore pro Spiel
Wer ist in den letzten 7 Spielen in bester Form?
Beijing Guoan führt die Formtabelle mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG in den letzten 7 Spielen an.
SHANGHAI SIPG gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Spielen mit 67% Siegen und 2.33 PPG.
Yunnan Yukun gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Spielen mit 67% Siegen und 2.33 PPG.
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Spielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Guangdong Shudihong steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Spielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Shangyu Pterosaur hat die schlechteste Form der letzten 7 Spielen mit nur 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
- •Die Formtabelle der letzten 7 Spiele der FA Cup (China) umfasst 64 Teams mit jeweils bis zu 7 aktuellen Spielen.
- •Die Siegquote in der FA Cup in diesem Zeitraum beträgt 38%
- •Teams erzielen im Schnitt 1.27 Tore pro Spiel und kassieren 1.27 — ein kombinierter Schnitt von 2.55 Gesamttoren, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird.
- •BTTS tritt in 43% der aktuellen Spiele auf, während FTS (mindestens ein Team trifft nicht) in 32% verzeichnet wird.
FA Cup (China) — Formtabelle der letzten 7 Spiele — Analyse
Beijing Guoan, SHANGHAI SIPG und Yunnan Yukun sind die Leistungsträger der FA Cup (China) in den letzten 7 Spielen mit 3.00, 2.33 und 2.33 PPG. In der FA Cup erzielen Teams 1.27 Tore und kassieren 1.27 pro Spiel — 2.55 Gesamttore, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird. BTTS zu 43%, FTS zu 32%.
Am unteren Ende der Formtabelle kämpfen Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong und Guangdong Shudihong mit nur 0.00 und 0.00 PPG in der FA Cup.
Heimformtabelle — Last 7
| # ▴ | Verein | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalian Kewei | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.50 | 75% | 50% | 2.25 | |
| 2 | Rizhao Yuqi | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 1.67 | 100% | 33% | 2.33 | |
| 3 | Shanghai Second | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | |
| 4 | Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 2.67 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 | |
| 5 | Yunnan Yukun | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 6 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | |
| 7 | Langfang Glory City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 8 | Qingdao Red Lions | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 9 | Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 10 | Beijing Guoan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 11 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Dalian Zhixing | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 13 | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 14 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 15 | Yulin Miners | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 16 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 17 | Xi'an Ronghai | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 18 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 19 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 20 | Shaanxi Union | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 21 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 22 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 23 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 24 | Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 25 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 26 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 27 | Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 28 | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 29 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 30 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 31 | Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 32 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 33 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 34 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 35 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 36 | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 37 | Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 38 | Shandong Luneng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 39 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 40 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 |
MP = Spiele · W = Siege · D = Unentschieden · L = Niederlagen · GF = Tore · GA = Gegentore · GD = Tordifferenz · Pts = Punkte · Form = Letzte 5 Spiele · PPG = Punkte pro Spiel · CS = Zu-Null-Spiele % · FTS = Ohne Tor · BTTS = Beide Teams treffen % · GF/g = Erzielte Tore pro Spiel · 1.5+ = Über 1,5 Tore % · 2.5+ = Über 2,5 Tore % · AVG = Durchschnittliche Tore pro Spiel
Wer hat die beste und schlechteste Heimform? (Letzte 7 Heimspiele)
Shanghai Shenhua führt die Formtabelle mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG in den letzten 7 Heimspielen an.
Beijing Guoan gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Heimspielen mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG.
Chongqing Tongliang Long gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Heimspielen mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG.
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Heimspielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Guangxi Hengchen steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Heimspielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Shandong Luneng hat die schlechteste Form der letzten 7 Heimspielen mit nur 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
- •Die Heimformtabelle (Letzte 7) der FA Cup (China) umfasst 40 Teams mit jeweils bis zu 7 aktuellen Heimspielen.
- •Die Siegquote in der FA Cup in diesem Zeitraum beträgt 35%
- •Teams erzielen im Schnitt 1.07 Tore pro Spiel und kassieren 1.48 — ein kombinierter Schnitt von 2.55 Gesamttoren, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird.
- •BTTS tritt in 43% der aktuellen Spiele auf, während FTS (mindestens ein Team trifft nicht) in 35% verzeichnet wird.
FA Cup (China) — Heimformtabelle Analyse (Letzte 7 Heimspiele)
Shanghai Shenhua, Beijing Guoan und Chongqing Tongliang Long sind die Leistungsträger der FA Cup (China) in den letzten 7 Heimspielen mit 3.00, 3.00 und 3.00 PPG. In der FA Cup erzielen Teams 1.07 Tore und kassieren 1.48 pro Spiel — 2.55 Gesamttore, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird. BTTS zu 43%, FTS zu 35%.
Am unteren Ende der Formtabelle kämpfen Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong und Guangxi Hengchen mit nur 0.00 und 0.00 PPG in der FA Cup.
Auswärtsformtabelle — Last 7
| # ▴ | Verein | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 3 | Shandong Luneng | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 4 | Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 5 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 6 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 7 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 8 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 9 | Yunnan Yukun | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 10 | Xi'an Ronghai | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 11 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Langfang Glory City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 14 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 15 | Rizhao Yuqi | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 16 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 17 | Shanghai Shenhua | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 18 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 19 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 20 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 21 | Qingdao Red Lions | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 22 | Shaanxi Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 23 | Dalian Zhixing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 24 | Changchun Yatai | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 25 | Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 26 | BIT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 27 | Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 28 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 29 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 30 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 31 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 32 | Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0.50 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 33 | Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 34 | Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 35 | Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 36 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 37 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 38 | Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 39 | Nanjing City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 40 | Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 41 | Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 42 | Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 43 | Dongguan United | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 44 | Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 45 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 46 | Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 47 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 48 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
MP = Spiele · W = Siege · D = Unentschieden · L = Niederlagen · GF = Tore · GA = Gegentore · GD = Tordifferenz · Pts = Punkte · Form = Letzte 5 Spiele · PPG = Punkte pro Spiel · CS = Zu-Null-Spiele % · FTS = Ohne Tor · BTTS = Beide Teams treffen % · GF/g = Erzielte Tore pro Spiel · 1.5+ = Über 1,5 Tore % · 2.5+ = Über 2,5 Tore % · AVG = Durchschnittliche Tore pro Spiel
Wer hat die beste und schlechteste Auswärtsform? (Letzte 7 Auswärtsspiele)
SHANGHAI SIPG führt die Formtabelle mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG in den letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen an.
Beijing Guoan gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG.
Jiangxi Liansheng gehört zu den Top-3-Formteams der letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit 100% Siegen und 3.00 PPG.
Yichun Grand Tiger steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Shangyu Pterosaur steckt in einem Formtief — unter den Bottom 3 der letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
Dalian Huayi hat die schlechteste Form der letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit nur 0% Siegen und 0.00 PPG.
- •Die Auswärtsformtabelle (Letzte 7) der FA Cup (China) umfasst 48 Teams mit jeweils bis zu 7 aktuellen Auswärtsspielen.
- •Die Siegquote in der FA Cup in diesem Zeitraum beträgt 40%
- •Teams erzielen im Schnitt 1.48 Tore pro Spiel und kassieren 1.07 — ein kombinierter Schnitt von 2.55 Gesamttoren, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird.
- •BTTS tritt in 43% der aktuellen Spiele auf, während FTS (mindestens ein Team trifft nicht) in 28% verzeichnet wird.
FA Cup (China) — Auswärtsformtabelle Analyse (Letzte 7 Auswärtsspiele)
SHANGHAI SIPG, Beijing Guoan und Jiangxi Liansheng sind die Leistungsträger der FA Cup (China) in den letzten 7 Auswärtsspielen mit 3.00, 3.00 und 3.00 PPG. In der FA Cup erzielen Teams 1.48 Tore und kassieren 1.07 pro Spiel — 2.55 Gesamttore, womit Over 2.5 begünstigt wird. BTTS zu 43%, FTS zu 28%.
Am unteren Ende der Formtabelle kämpfen Yichun Grand Tiger und Shangyu Pterosaur mit nur 0.00 und 0.00 PPG in der FA Cup.
Formtabellen — China
- League One Formtabelle— Division Gold
- League Two Formtabelle— Division Pro
- Super Cup Formtabelle— Division Premium
- Super League Formtabelle— Division Premium