FA Cup — 2nd Half Table
China · 2026/27
China — FA Cup 2026/27 — Detailed Stats
Leader:Langfang Glory City — 9ptsLeague Avg:1.16 goals
Highest Avg:Guangdong Shudihong (4.00)
Lowest Avg:Guangzhou Dandelion (0.00)Overall / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langfang Glory City | 3 | 3-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 2 |  Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-2-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 8 | DDWW | 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 3 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 4 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 5 | 2-1-2 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 7 | LWDLW | 1.40 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 2.00 |
| 5 |  Yunnan Yukun | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 6 |  Shandong Luneng | 3 | 2-0-1 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 2.33 |
| 7 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | 3 | 2-0-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 6 | LWW | 2.00 | 67% | 0% | 33% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 |  Beijing Guoan | 3 | 1-2-0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 5 | WDD | 1.67 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 2.33 |
| 9 |  Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-2-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 10 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 3 | 1-2-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 5 | DWD | 1.67 | 100% | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
| 11 |  Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 12 |  Henan Jianye | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 13 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 14 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 15 |  Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 16 |  Wuxi Wugou | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 17 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 18 |  SHANGHAI SIPG | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | WLD | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 19 |  Dalian Zhixing | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 20 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 21 |  Changchun Xidu | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 22 |  Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 |  Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 24 |  Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 25 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 26 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 27 |  Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 28 |  Ningbo Professional | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 29 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 30 |  Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-0-2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
| 31 |  Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 32 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 33 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 34 |  BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 35 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 36 |  Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 37 |  Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 38 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 39 |  Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 40 |  Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 41 |  Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 42 |  Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 43 |  Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 44 |  Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 45 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 1.50 |
| 46 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 47 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 48 |  Hebei Kungfu | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 49 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 50 |  Shaanxi Union | 3 | 0-1-2 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 | LLD | 0.33 | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 51 |  Changchun Yatai | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 52 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 53 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 54 |  Dongguan United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 55 |  Nanjing City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 56 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 57 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 58 |  Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 59 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 60 | Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 61 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 62 |  Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 63 |  Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 64 |  Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — 2nd Half Table
Langfang Glory City leads the FA Cup second half table overall with 9 points from 3 games (3W-0D-0L), averaging 1.33 goals per game.
Dalian Kewei follows in second place with 8 points. The league average at second half overall is 1.16 goals per game, with Guangdong Shudihong recording the highest average at 4.00.
Leader:Dalian Kewei — 8ptsLeague Avg:1.2 goalsHighest Avg:Guangdong Shudihong (4.00)Lowest Avg:Shanghai Shenhua (0.00)Home / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-2-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 8 | DDWW | 2.00 | 75% | 25% | 25% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 2 | Langfang Glory City | 2 | 2-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 3 | Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-2-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 4 | Yunnan Yukun | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 5 | Rizhao Yuqi | 3 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WDL | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 | Xi'an Ronghai | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 7 | Qingdao Red Lions | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 8 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 9 | Beijing Guoan | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 10 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 11 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 13 | Dalian Zhixing | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 14 | Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 15 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-0-2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 | LWL | 1.00 | 0% | 67% | 33% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.33 |
| 17 | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 18 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 19 | Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 20 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 21 | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 22 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 23 | Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 24 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 25 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 26 | Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 27 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 28 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 29 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 30 | Shaanxi Union | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 31 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 32 | Shandong Luneng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 33 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 34 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 35 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 36 | Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 37 | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 38 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 39 | Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 40 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — Home 2nd Half Table
Dalian Kewei leads the FA Cup second half table at home with 8 points from 4 games (2W-2D-0L), averaging 1.00 goals per game.
Langfang Glory City follows in second place with 6 points. The league average at second half at home is 1.20 goals per game, with Guangdong Shudihong recording the highest average at 4.00.
Leader:Shandong Luneng — 6ptsLeague Avg:1.13 goalsHighest Avg:Heilongjiang Lava Spring (4.00)Lowest Avg:Hebei Kungfu (0.00)Away / 2nd Half Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (2H) | PPG (2H) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Luneng | 2 | 2-0-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 2 | Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 3 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 5 | Langfang Glory City | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 6 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 7 | Xi'an Ronghai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 8 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 9 | Rizhao Yuqi | 2 | 1-0-1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.50 |
| 10 | Changchun Xidu | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 11 | Yunnan Yukun | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 | Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 13 | Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 14 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 15 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 17 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 18 | Shanghai Shenhua | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 19 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 20 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 0-2-0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 21 | BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 22 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 23 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 24 | Qingdao Red Lions | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 25 | Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 26 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 27 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 28 | Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 29 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 30 | Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 31 | Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 32 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 33 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 34 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 35 | Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 36 | Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 37 | Dalian Zhixing | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 38 | Shaanxi Union | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 39 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 40 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 41 | Dongguan United | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 42 | Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 43 | Nanjing City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 44 | Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 45 | Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 46 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 47 | Changchun Yatai | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 48 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — Away 2nd Half Table
Shandong Luneng leads the FA Cup second half table away with 6 points from 2 games (2W-0D-0L), averaging 3.00 goals per game.
Chengdu Better City follows in second place with 4 points. The league average at second half away is 1.13 goals per game, with Heilongjiang Lava Spring recording the highest average at 4.00.