FA Cup — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
China · 2026/27
Under 2.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 2.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 35 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 45 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 5 | 2 | 40% | 67% | 0% | |
| 49 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 50 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 2.5 Insights
League average
62%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Chongqing Tongliang Long lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 2.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 59%, putting Chongqing Tongliang Long ahead of the rest.
Dalian Zhixing and Langfang Glory City rank second and third respectively. Dalian Zhixing recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Langfang Glory City stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Shanghai Zetian record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 2.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 59%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 41 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Chongqing Tongliang Long's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 0.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 0.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 0.5 Insights
League average
7%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Qingdao Red Lions lead the FA Cup with a 33% Under 0.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 2%, putting Qingdao Red Lions ahead of the rest.
Beijing Guoan and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Beijing Guoan recorded a 0% rate across 3 matches (0 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 0% from 3 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 0.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 2%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 11%, sitting 9 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Qingdao Red Lions's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 1.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 1.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 24 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 26 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 27 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 28 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 25% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 1.5 Insights
League average
27%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Qingdao Red Lions lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 1.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 22%, putting Qingdao Red Lions ahead of the rest.
Shanghai Second and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Shanghai Second recorded a 67% rate across 3 matches (2 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Xi'an Ronghai record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 1.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 22%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 67%, sitting 45 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Qingdao Red Lions's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 3.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 3.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 43 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 45 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 5 | 3 | 60% | 100% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 51 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 52 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 56 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 3.5 Insights
League average
75%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dalian Kewei lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 3.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 76%, putting Dalian Kewei ahead of the rest.
Chongqing Tongliang Long and Dalian Zhixing rank second and third respectively. Chongqing Tongliang Long recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Dalian Zhixing stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Shanghai Zetian record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 3.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 76%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 24 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dalian Kewei's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 4.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 4.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 25 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 49 | 5 | 4 | 80% | 100% | 50% | |
| 50 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% | |
| 52 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 59 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 60 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 4.5 Insights
League average
85%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dalian Kewei lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 4.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 84%, putting Dalian Kewei ahead of the rest.
Beijing Guoan and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Beijing Guoan recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the FA Cup at 33% — only 1 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 50% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 4.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 84%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 16 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dalian Kewei's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 5.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 5.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 27 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 28 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 30 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 31 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 32 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 49 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 50 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 51 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 52 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 53 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 56 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 57 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 59 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 60 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 61 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 5.5 Insights
League average
92%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Rizhao Yuqi lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 5.5 rate — 5 of their 5 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 90%, putting Rizhao Yuqi ahead of the rest.
Dalian Kewei and Beijing Guoan rank second and third respectively. Dalian Kewei recorded a 100% rate across 4 matches (4 stayed below), while Beijing Guoan stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the FA Cup at 33% — only 1 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 50% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 5.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 90%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 10 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Rizhao Yuqi's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.