MatchPulse
Amapaense

Amapaense — Home Advantage

Brazil · 2026

Brazil — Amapaense 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Trem+59%+58%+60%2.50/0.33
2Macapá+17%+14%+20%0.33/0.75
3Oratório+17%+32%+2%1.80/1.75
4Santos AP-4%-17%+9%1.60/2.60
5Independente AP-14%-11%-17%1.20/2.00
6Ypiranga-PE-17%-20%-14%0.00/1.75
7São José EC-20%-7%-33%1.40/2.20
8Cristal-21%-50%+8%0.00/0.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Amapaense (Brazil), the average home win rate is 29% compared to 39% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Trem shows the strongest home advantage, winning 75% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +75%). At the other end, Ypiranga-PE actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 50% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Trem+58%2.500.67
2Oratório+32%2.401.25
3Macapá+14%0.670.50
4São José EC-7%1.401.60
5Independente AP-11%1.802.25
6Santos AP-17%2.002.80
7Ypiranga-PE-20%0.671.00
8Cristal-50%0.331.00

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Trem has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Amapaense (Brazil), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 0.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +58%. In contrast, Cristal scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.33/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -50% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Trem+60%0.502.00
2Macapá+20%1.672.50
3Santos AP+9%1.001.20
4Cristal+8%2.332.75
5Oratório+2%1.201.25
6Ypiranga-PE-14%2.001.50
7Independente AP-17%1.401.00
8São José EC-33%2.001.00

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Defence Analysis

Trem has the best home defensive record in the Amapaense (Brazil), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 2.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +60%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, São José EC concedes more at home (2.00/match) than away (1.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Trem+38%1.500.67
2Santos AP+25%1.000.60
3Oratório+23%1.200.75
4Macapá+14%0.670.50
5São José EC-20%0.400.60
6Independente AP-20%0.500.75
7Ypiranga-PE-100%0.000.33
8Cristal-100%0.000.50

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Trem has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Amapaense (Brazil), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +38%. At the other end, Cristal shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.50 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Macapá+58%0.331.25
2Independente AP+50%0.250.75
3Oratório+43%0.200.50
4Trem+14%0.250.33
5São José EC0%0.600.60
6Cristal-3%1.331.25
7Ypiranga-PE-14%1.331.00
8Santos AP-60%0.800.20

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Macapá has the best home defensive record in the Amapaense (Brazil), conceding just 0.33 goals/match at home compared to 1.25 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Santos AP struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.80/match at home versus 0.20 away (-60%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Trem+100%1.000.00
2Oratório+41%1.200.50
3Ypiranga-PE0%0.670.67
4Macapá0%0.000.00
5Independente AP0%1.501.50
6São José EC0%1.001.00
7Cristal-20%0.330.50
8Santos AP-38%1.002.20

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Trem has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Amapaense (Brazil), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Santos AP shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 2.20 away (-38%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Trem+74%0.251.67
2Santos AP+67%0.201.00
3Cristal+20%1.001.50
4Ypiranga-PE0%0.670.67
5Macapá-3%1.331.25
6Oratório-14%1.000.75
7São José EC-56%1.400.40
8Independente AP-67%1.250.25

Amapaense (Brazil) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Trem has the best home defensive record in the Amapaense (Brazil), conceding just 0.25 goals/match at home compared to 1.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +74%. Independente AP struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.25/match at home versus 0.25 away (-67%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Brazil