MLS Next Pro — Form Table
USA · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Huntsville City | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | +9 | 16 | DWWWLWW | 2.29 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.29 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 2 |  Chattanooga | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 16 | DLWWWWW | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.57 | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 3 |  Austin II | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 16 | DWLWWWW | 2.29 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 1.29 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 4 |  Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 16 | WWLWWWD | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 5 |  Minnesota United II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 14 | DWWWDWL | 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 2.14 | 86% | 43% | 3.14 | |
| 6 |  Ventura County | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 14 | DWDWWLW | 2.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.29 | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | |
| 7 |  Atlanta United II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 13 | WWDWLWL | 1.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 8 |  Portland Timbers II | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 13 | WDWDDDW | 1.86 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 9 |  Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 13 | LWLWDWW | 1.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 10 |  Connecticut FC | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 13 | +4 | 12 | WWLLLWW | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.43 | 71% | 57% | 4.29 | |
| 11 |  New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 10 | WWWLDLL | 1.43 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 12 |  New York City II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 10 | WLLWWDL | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 13 |  Toronto II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 10 | DLWWWLL | 1.43 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 14 |  The Town | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 9 | LWLLWWL | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | |
| 15 |  St. Louis City II | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 | WDDWDLL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 100% | 29% | 2.43 | |
| 16 |  Orlando City II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 9 | LLLWWWL | 1.29 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 17 |  Columbus Crew II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 8 | LWLLDDW | 1.14 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 18 |  Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 8 | WLLDWLD | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 19 |  Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | DDWLLLW | 1.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 20 |  North Texas | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 7 | DDDWLDL | 1.00 | 29% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 21 |  Carolina Core | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 7 | DWLLDDD | 1.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.86 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 22 |  Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 | LLWWDLL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.86 | 86% | 71% | 4.29 | |
| 23 |  Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 7 | LLWLWLD | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | |
| 24 |  Inter Miami II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 7 | WLDWLLL | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 86% | 5.29 | |
| 25 |  Real Monarchs | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 7 | LLWLLDW | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 86% | 3.29 | |
| 26 |  Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 | DLLWDLD | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 27 |  Chicago Fire II | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 | WLWLLLL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | |
| 28 |  New England II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 5 | LLLDDWL | 0.71 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 29 |  FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 4 | LLWLLDL | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 30 |  Sporting KC II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 4 | DLLLLLW | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 100% | 100% | 4.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Huntsville City leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 games.
Chattanooga is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Austin II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Sporting KC II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
FC Cincinnati II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
New England II has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 39%
- •Teams score an average of 1.76 goals per game and concede 1.80 — a combined 3.56 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 71% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 16% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Huntsville City, Chattanooga and Austin II have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.29, 2.29 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.76 goals and concede 1.80 per game — a combined 3.56 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 71% of fixtures while 16% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Sporting KC II and FC Cincinnati II have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ventura County | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 6 | +16 | 19 | WWWWDWW | 2.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 3.14 | 100% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 2 | Chattanooga | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 5 | +14 | 19 | WDWWWWW | 2.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.71 | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 3 | Austin II | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 18 | WLWWWWW | 2.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.00 | 57% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 4 | New York City II | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 17 | DDWWWWW | 2.43 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 5 | Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 16 | WWLWWWD | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.00 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 6 | Connecticut FC | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 | WWWWLLW | 2.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 7 | Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 15 | WDDWWWD | 2.14 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 8 | Minnesota United II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 10 | +9 | 14 | WDLDWWW | 2.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.71 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 9 | Columbus Crew II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 14 | WLWWDDW | 2.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.14 | 100% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 10 | Atlanta United II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 13 | WDLWWWL | 1.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.57 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 11 | Real Monarchs | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 13 | LWWLWDW | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 3.43 | |
| 12 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 13 | DWWLWWL | 1.86 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 13 | Toronto II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 13 | LWDWWWL | 1.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 14 | Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 13 | LWLWWDW | 1.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 2.00 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 15 | Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | LWWDWLW | 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.43 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 16 | Chicago Fire II | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 12 | WWLWWLL | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 17 | Portland Timbers II | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 12 | LWDWDDW | 1.71 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 18 | Huntsville City | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 11 | DWLDWWL | 1.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 19 | Carolina Core | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 11 | WDWLWLD | 1.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 57% | 3.29 | |
| 20 | Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | WLDWLWD | 1.57 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 21 | New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 10 | WWLLWDL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.57 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 22 | Orlando City II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 10 | WLDLWWL | 1.43 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 23 | North Texas | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 9 | WLDDWLD | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | |
| 24 | The Town | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 | LDLWLLW | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 25 | New England II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 | WLLDWLL | 1.00 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 4.14 | |
| 26 | Inter Miami II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 7 | LLWDWLL | 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 3.86 | |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 7 | LLWWDLL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 28 | St. Louis City II | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 | LLDWDDL | 0.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 100% | 43% | 2.57 | |
| 29 | FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 5 | WDLDLLL | 0.71 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 30 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 | WLDLLLD | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 100% | 43% | 2.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Ventura County leads the form table with 86% wins and 2.71 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Chattanooga is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.71 PPG.
Austin II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.57 PPG.
Houston Dynamo FC II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
FC Cincinnati II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
St. Louis City II has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 50%
- •Teams score an average of 1.95 goals per game and concede 1.46 — a combined 3.41 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 65% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 15% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Ventura County, Chattanooga and Austin II have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.71, 2.71 and 2.57 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.95 goals and concede 1.46 per game — a combined 3.41 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 65% of fixtures while 15% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Houston Dynamo FC II and FC Cincinnati II have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.71 and 0.71 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Portland Timbers II | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 15 | WDWWWDD | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 2 | Connecticut FC | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 15 | WWWWLLW | 2.14 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.14 | 71% | 57% | 3.71 | |
| 3 | Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 14 | DWWWDLW | 2.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 4 | Huntsville City | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 13 | LDWLWWW | 1.86 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.57 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 5 | Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 13 | WLLDWWW | 1.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 2.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 6 | Austin II | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 12 | WDDDLWW | 1.71 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 86% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 7 | Chattanooga | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 12 | DDWDLWW | 1.71 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 8 | Ventura County | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 10 | LLWWDWL | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.71 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 9 | New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 9 | LLWWWLL | 1.29 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 3.86 | |
| 10 | Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 | WWLLLWL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 11 | New England II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 8 | WLLDDWL | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.71 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 12 | The Town | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 | WLDDLWL | 1.14 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 43% | 2.57 | |
| 13 | Minnesota United II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 | LWLDWDL | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 14 | St. Louis City II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 | LLDWWDL | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 86% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 15 | Orlando City II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 7 | WDLLLLW | 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.43 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 16 | Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 6 | DDLLWLD | 0.86 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 17 | Columbus Crew II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 | WDDLLLL | 0.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 57% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 18 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 | LLLLDWD | 0.71 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 19 | Chicago Fire II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 5 | DDLWLLL | 0.71 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 4.29 | |
| 20 | North Texas | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 5 | LDLWLDL | 0.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 29% | 2.57 | |
| 21 | Carolina Core | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 4 | LDLDLDD | 0.57 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 22 | Atlanta United II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 | LLLLDLW | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 23 | FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 4 | LLLLWLD | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 24 | Toronto II | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 | LLLLWLL | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 25 | Sporting KC II | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 3 | LLLLLLW | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 26 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 2 | LLDLLDL | 0.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | |
| 27 | Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 1 | LLLLDLL | 0.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | |
| 28 | New York City II | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 1 | LLLLLDL | 0.14 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.14 | 100% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 29 | Real Monarchs | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 21 | -17 | 1 | DLLLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 30 | Inter Miami II | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 | LLLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 57% | 3.71 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Connecticut FC leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.14 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Portland Timbers II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.14 PPG.
Crown Legacy is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Inter Miami II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Real Monarchs is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
New York City II has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.14 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 26%
- •Teams score an average of 1.38 goals per game and concede 2.01 — a combined 3.39 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 65% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 25% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Connecticut FC, Portland Timbers II and Crown Legacy have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.14, 2.14 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.38 goals and concede 2.01 per game — a combined 3.39 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 65% of fixtures while 25% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Inter Miami II and Real Monarchs have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.14 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Form Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Form Table— Division Underground
- Major League Soccer Form Table— Division Premium
- NISA Form Table— Division Underground
- NPSL Form Table— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Form Table— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- USL Championship Form Table— Division Pro
- USL League One Form Table— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Form Table— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Form Table— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Form Table— Division Women's Pro