Santosh Trophy — Clean Sheets
India · 2025/26
Clean Sheets
| # | Team | MJ | CS | % CS | CS Dom. | CS Ext. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tamilnadu | 9 | 6 | 67% | 3 | 3 |
| 2 |  Services | 10 | 5 | 50% | 2 | 3 |
| 3 |  Railways | 10 | 5 | 50% | 3 | 2 |
| 4 |  West Bengal | 6 | 4 | 67% | 3 | 1 |
| 5 |  Kerala | 7 | 4 | 57% | 2 | 2 |
| 6 |  Punjab | 10 | 4 | 40% | 1 | 3 |
| 7 |  Odisha | 8 | 3 | 38% | 1 | 2 |
| 8 |  Uttarakhand | 8 | 3 | 38% | 2 | 1 |
| 9 |  Rajasthan | 9 | 3 | 33% | 0 | 3 |
| 10 |  Delhi | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0 | 2 |
| 11 |  Gujarat | 3 | 2 | 67% | 1 | 1 |
| 12 |  J & K | 3 | 2 | 67% | 1 | 1 |
| 13 |  Nagaland | 8 | 2 | 25% | 1 | 1 |
| 14 |  Arunachal Pradesh | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 1 |
| 15 |  Goa | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 16 |  Andhra Pradesh | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 1 |
| 17 |  Chandigarh | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 18 |  Chhattisgarh | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 1 |
| 19 |  Haryana | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 1 |
| 20 |  Jharkhand | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 21 |  Karnataka | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 22 |  Maharashtra | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 23 |  Mizoram | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 1 |
| 24 |  Telangana | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0 | 1 |
| 25 |  Ladakh | 3 | 1 | 33% | 1 | 0 |
| 26 |  Assam | 6 | 1 | 17% | 0 | 1 |
| 27 |  Meghalaya | 7 | 1 | 14% | 0 | 1 |
| 28 |  Bihar | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 29 |  Himachal Pradesh | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 30 |  Lakshadweep | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 31 |  Madhya Pradesh | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 32 |  Manipur | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 33 |  Pondicherry | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 34 |  Sikkim | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 35 |  Tripura | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 36 |  Uttar Pradesh | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 37 |  Andamans & Nicobar | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
| 38 |  DNH & DD | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
Dom. / Clean Sheets
| # | Team | MJ | CS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gujarat | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | J & K | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Karnataka | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 | West Bengal | 4 | 3 | 75% |
| 5 | Railways | 4 | 3 | 75% |
| 6 | Tamilnadu | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 7 | Goa | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 | Chandigarh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 | Jharkhand | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 | Kerala | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| 11 | Maharashtra | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 12 | Uttarakhand | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| 13 | Ladakh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 | Services | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 15 | Odisha | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 16 | Nagaland | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 17 | Punjab | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| 18 | Andhra Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 | Arunachal Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 | Assam | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 | Bihar | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 | Chhattisgarh | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 | Delhi | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 | Haryana | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 | Himachal Pradesh | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 | Lakshadweep | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 | Madhya Pradesh | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 | Manipur | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Meghalaya | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Mizoram | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 | Pondicherry | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 | Rajasthan | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 | Sikkim | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 | Telangana | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 | Tripura | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 | Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 | Andamans & Nicobar | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 | DNH & DD | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Ext. / Clean Sheets
| # | Team | MJ | CS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arunachal Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | Chhattisgarh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Delhi | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Tamilnadu | 4 | 3 | 75% |
| 5 | Kerala | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 6 | Punjab | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 7 | Services | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| 8 | Andhra Pradesh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 | Gujarat | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 | Haryana | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 11 | J & K | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 12 | Mizoram | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 13 | Rajasthan | 6 | 3 | 50% |
| 14 | Telangana | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 | West Bengal | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 16 | Odisha | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 17 | Assam | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 | Railways | 6 | 2 | 33% |
| 19 | Meghalaya | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 20 | Nagaland | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 21 | Uttarakhand | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 | Goa | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 | Bihar | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 | Chandigarh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 | Himachal Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 | Jharkhand | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 | Karnataka | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 | Lakshadweep | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Madhya Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Maharashtra | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 | Manipur | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 | Pondicherry | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 | Sikkim | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 | Tripura | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 | Uttar Pradesh | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 | Andamans & Nicobar | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 | Ladakh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 | DNH & DD | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Quelles équipes gardent le plus souvent leur cage inviolée ?
Delhi a le plus de clean sheets du championnat — 67%
Gujarat est #2 pour les clean sheets — 67%
J & K est #3 pour les clean sheets — 67%
DNH & DD garde le moins souvent cage inviolée — 0%
Andamans & Nicobar garde le moins souvent cage inviolée — 0%
Uttar Pradesh garde le moins souvent cage inviolée — 0%
Stats Clean Sheets de la Ligue
- compte 36 équipes
- Taux de clean sheets de la ligue : 34%
- Taux CS dom. : 31%
- Taux CS ext. : 38%
Santosh Trophy (India) — Analyse des Clean Sheets
Dans la Santosh Trophy (India), 68% des matchs se terminent par un clean sheet pour l'une des équipes. Le Tamilnadu mène avec 6 clean sheets (67% de leurs matchs), dont 3 à domicile et 3 à l'extérieur.
Angle Pari — Marchés Clean Sheet
Les données de clean sheet sont essentielles pour les marchés Les Deux Équipes Ne Marquent Pas, Under 0.5 et Clean Sheet. Les équipes avec un CS% élevé à domicile mais faible à l'extérieur sont des candidats idéaux pour le BTTS Non à domicile.
Tableaux Statistiques — India
- AIFF Super Cup Clean Sheets— Division Pro
- Calcutta Premier Division Clean Sheets— Division Underground
- I-League Clean Sheets— Division Underground
- I-League - 2nd Division Clean Sheets— Division Underground
- IFA Shield Clean Sheets— Division Underground
- Indian Super League Clean Sheets— Division Gold