Santosh Trophy — Sans Marquer
India · 2025/26
Équipes Sans But
| # | Team | MJ | SB | % SB | % Dom. | % Ext. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Bihar | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |  Himachal Pradesh | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |  Madhya Pradesh | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 4 |  DNH & DD | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |  Chandigarh | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 6 |  Maharashtra | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 7 |  Uttar Pradesh | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% |
| 8 |  Andamans & Nicobar | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% |
| 9 |  Ladakh | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 10 |  Sikkim | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% |
| 11 |  Odisha | 8 | 3 | 38% | 33% | 40% |
| 12 |  Goa | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 13 |  Andhra Pradesh | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 14 |  Assam | 6 | 2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 15 |  Delhi | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 16 |  Haryana | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 |  J & K | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 18 |  Jharkhand | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 19 |  Karnataka | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 |  Lakshadweep | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% |
| 21 |  Manipur | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% |
| 22 |  Mizoram | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 |  Pondicherry | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 24 |  Rajasthan | 9 | 3 | 33% | 67% | 17% |
| 25 |  Telangana | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| 26 |  Tripura | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% |
| 27 |  Services | 10 | 3 | 30% | 40% | 20% |
| 28 |  Nagaland | 8 | 2 | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| 29 |  Uttarakhand | 8 | 2 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 30 |  Punjab | 10 | 2 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 31 |  Railways | 10 | 2 | 20% | 25% | 17% |
| 32 |  West Bengal | 6 | 1 | 17% | 25% | 0% |
| 33 |  Kerala | 7 | 1 | 14% | 25% | 0% |
| 34 |  Meghalaya | 7 | 1 | 14% | 33% | 0% |
| 35 |  Tamilnadu | 9 | 1 | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| 36 |  Arunachal Pradesh | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 37 |  Chhattisgarh | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 38 |  Gujarat | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Dom. / Sans But
| # | Team | MJ | SB | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bihar | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | Haryana | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Himachal Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 | Madhya Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 5 | Mizoram | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 6 | Sikkim | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 7 | Telangana | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 | Tripura | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 | Andamans & Nicobar | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 10 | DNH & DD | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 11 | Rajasthan | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 12 | Goa | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 13 | Chandigarh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 | Jharkhand | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 | Maharashtra | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 16 | Pondicherry | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 17 | Ladakh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 18 | Services | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 19 | Meghalaya | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 20 | Odisha | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 21 | Kerala | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 | Nagaland | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 23 | West Bengal | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 24 | Railways | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 25 | Punjab | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| 26 | Tamilnadu | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| 27 | Andhra Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 | Arunachal Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Assam | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Chhattisgarh | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 | Delhi | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 | Gujarat | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 | J & K | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 | Karnataka | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 | Lakshadweep | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 | Manipur | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 | Uttar Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 | Uttarakhand | 4 | 0 | 0% |
Ext. / Sans But
| # | Team | MJ | SB | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bihar | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | Chandigarh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Himachal Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 4 | Lakshadweep | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 | Madhya Pradesh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 6 | Maharashtra | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 7 | Manipur | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 | Uttar Pradesh | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 | Ladakh | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 | DNH & DD | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 11 | Assam | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 12 | Andhra Pradesh | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 13 | Delhi | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 | J & K | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 | Karnataka | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 16 | Uttarakhand | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| 17 | Odisha | 5 | 2 | 40% |
| 18 | Nagaland | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 19 | Punjab | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| 20 | Services | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| 21 | Rajasthan | 6 | 1 | 17% |
| 22 | Railways | 6 | 1 | 17% |
| 23 | Goa | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 | Arunachal Pradesh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 | Chhattisgarh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 | Gujarat | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 | Haryana | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 | Jharkhand | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 | Kerala | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 | Meghalaya | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 | Mizoram | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 | Pondicherry | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 | Sikkim | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 | Tamilnadu | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 | Telangana | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 | Tripura | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 | West Bengal | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 | Andamans & Nicobar | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Quelles équipes ne marquent pas le plus souvent ?
Bihar ne marque pas le plus souvent du championnat — 100%
Himachal Pradesh est #2 pour taux sans but — 100%
Madhya Pradesh est #3 pour taux sans but — 100%
Gujarat rate rarement de marquer — 0%
Chhattisgarh rate rarement de marquer — 0%
Tamilnadu rate rarement de marquer — 11%
Stats Sans But de la Ligue
- compte 36 équipes
- Taux sans but de la ligue : 34%
- Taux SB dom. : 38%
- Taux SB ext. : 31%
Santosh Trophy (India) — Analyse des Équipes Sans But
Dans la Santosh Trophy (India), les équipes ne marquent pas dans 68% des matchs. Le Bihar échoue à marquer le plus souvent, restant muet dans 100% de ses matchs. Le Gujarat a l'attaque la plus fiable avec seulement 0% sans but.
Angle Pari — Marchés à Faible Score
Un taux élevé d'échec à marquer est un signal fort pour les marchés BTTS Non, Under 1.5 et Clean Sheet. Quand deux équipes à fort taux FTS s'affrontent, le Under 1.5 et le Score Exact 0-0 deviennent statistiquement viables.
Tableaux Statistiques — India
- AIFF Super Cup Sans But— Division Pro
- Calcutta Premier Division Sans But— Division Underground
- I-League Sans But— Division Underground
- I-League - 2nd Division Sans But— Division Underground
- IFA Shield Sans But— Division Underground
- Indian Super League Sans But— Division Gold