US Open Cup — Ambos Marcan
USA · 2026
USA — US Open Cup 2026 — Estadísticas Detalladas
Ambos Marcan (BTTS)
Casa / Ambos Marcan
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Orlando City SC | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 |  Houston Dynamo | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 |  New York Red Bulls | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 |  Chicago Fire | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |  New England Revolution | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 6 |  DC United | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 7 |  Charleston Battery | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 |  Charlotte Independence | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 9 |  Ventura County Fusion | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 |  Little Rock Rangers | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 11 |  West Chester United | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 12 |  Detroit City | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 13 |  Asheville City | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 14 |  Carolina Core | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 15 |  Vistula | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 16 |  Columbus Crew | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 17 |  Chattanooga | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 18 |  San Jose Earthquakes | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 19 |  Indy Eleven | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |  Louisville City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 21 |  New Mexico United | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |  Orange County SC | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 23 |  Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |  St. Louis City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 25 |  Westchester SC | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 26 |  Colorado Springs | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 27 |  Colorado Rapids | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 28 |  Phoenix Rising | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |  Sacramento Republic | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |  San Antonio | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |  Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |  Flint City Bucks | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 33 |  FC Motown | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |  Laredo Heat | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |  Charlotte | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |  Vermont Green | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |  Lexington | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |  Rhode Island | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |  Naples | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |  Alta | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |  BOHFS St. Louis | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 42 |  Tennessee Tempo | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |  Valley 559 FC | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Fuera / Ambos Marcan
¿Qué equipos tienen más partidos con ambos marcando?
Houston Dynamo tiene la mayor tasa de ambos marcan — 100%
Orlando City SC es #2 en tasa BTTS — 75%
Charlotte Independence es #3 en tasa BTTS — 67%
Sacramento Republic tiene una de las tasas BTTS más bajas — 0%
Westchester SC tiene una de las tasas BTTS más bajas — 33%
Rhode Island tiene una de las tasas BTTS más bajas — 33%
Stats BTTS de la Liga
- tiene 14 equipos
- Tasa BTTS de la liga: 51%
- Tasa BTTS en casa: 54%
- Tasa BTTS fuera: 47%
1er Tiempo — Tasa BTTS
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % | % Local | % Fuera |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  New York City FC | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 67% |
| 2 | Chattanooga | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% |
| 3 | Orlando City SC | 4 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 67% |
| 4 | Columbus Crew | 4 | 2 | 50% | 67% | 0% |
| 5 |  One Knoxville | 4 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 6 | Houston Dynamo | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% |
| 7 |  Atlanta United FC | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 8 | Charlotte Independence | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | Detroit City | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 | Westchester SC | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 11 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 1 | 25% | 25% | 0% |
| 12 | Colorado Springs | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 100% |
| 13 | St. Louis City | 4 | 1 | 25% | 50% | 0% |
| 14 | San Jose Earthquakes | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |  El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | Louisville City | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 |  FC Tulsa | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 |  Union Omaha | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | Rhode Island | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | Naples | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Casa / BTTS en 1T
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbus Crew | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 2 | Chattanooga | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 3 | Charlotte Independence | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 4 | Detroit City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 5 | St. Louis City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 | Westchester SC | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 8 | San Jose Earthquakes | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Orlando City SC | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | Houston Dynamo | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 | Louisville City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | Phoenix Rising | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Sacramento Republic | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 | Rhode Island | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 | Naples | 3 | 0 | 0% |
Fuera / BTTS en 1T
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Dynamo | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | Colorado Springs | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Orlando City SC | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 4 | New York City FC | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 5 | One Knoxville | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| 6 | Atlanta United FC | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 | San Jose Earthquakes | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | Columbus Crew | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Charlotte Independence | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 | Louisville City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 | Phoenix Rising | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Sacramento Republic | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | Detroit City | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 | Union Omaha | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 | St. Louis City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 | Rhode Island | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 | Westchester SC | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Insights BTTS — 1T
New York City FC tiene la mayor tasa BTTS en 1T — 67%
Chattanooga es #2 en BTTS en 1T — 67%
Orlando City SC es #3 en BTTS en 1T — 50%
Naples raramente tiene BTTS en 1T — 0%
Rhode Island raramente tiene BTTS en 1T — 0%
Union Omaha raramente tiene BTTS en 1T — 0%
STATS BTTS — 1T
- 24 equipos
- Tasa BTTS 1T de la liga: 23%
- BTTS 1T en casa: 22%
- BTTS 1T fuera: 24%
- Equipos BTTS 1T ≥20%: 54% (13/24)
2º Tiempo — Tasa BTTS
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % | % Local | % Fuera |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Dynamo | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 2 | 67% | 50% | 100% |
| 3 | San Jose Earthquakes | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 4 | New York City FC | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 5 | Charlotte Independence | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 6 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 7 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| 8 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 9 | Union Omaha | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| 10 | Rhode Island | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 100% |
| 11 | Westchester SC | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% |
| 12 | Orlando City SC | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 33% |
| 13 | Louisville City | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 14 | One Knoxville | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 25% |
| 15 | St. Louis City | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0% | 50% |
| 16 | Atlanta United FC | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Columbus Crew | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 | Colorado Springs | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 22 | Detroit City | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23 | Chattanooga | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 24 | Naples | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Casa / BTTS en 2T
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Dynamo | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| 2 | San Jose Earthquakes | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 3 | Charlotte Independence | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 5 | Westchester SC | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | Columbus Crew | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 | Louisville City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 | Phoenix Rising | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 | Sacramento Republic | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Detroit City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Chattanooga | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | St. Louis City | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 | Rhode Island | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 | Naples | 3 | 0 | 0% |
Fuera / BTTS en 2T
| # | Team | PJ | AM | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 2 | Rhode Island | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 3 | Louisville City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 4 | Phoenix Rising | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 5 | St. Louis City | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 | Orlando City SC | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 | New York City FC | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 8 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 9 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 10 | Union Omaha | 3 | 1 | 33% |
| 11 | One Knoxville | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| 12 | San Jose Earthquakes | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 13 | Houston Dynamo | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| 15 | Columbus Crew | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 | Charlotte Independence | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 | Colorado Springs | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 18 | Sacramento Republic | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 | Detroit City | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 20 | Westchester SC | 1 | 0 | 0% |
Insights BTTS — 2T
Houston Dynamo tiene la mayor tasa BTTS en 2T — 67%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds es #2 en BTTS en 2T — 67%
San Jose Earthquakes es #3 en BTTS en 2T — 33%
Naples raramente tiene BTTS en 2T — 0%
Chattanooga raramente tiene BTTS en 2T — 0%
Detroit City raramente tiene BTTS en 2T — 0%
STATS BTTS — 2T
- 24 equipos
- Tasa BTTS 2T de la liga: 22%
- BTTS 2T en casa: 15%
- BTTS 2T fuera: 29%
- Equipos BTTS 2T ≥40%: 8% (2/24)
US Open Cup (USA) — Análisis BTTS (Ambos Marcan)
En la US Open Cup (USA), ambos equipos marcan en el 93% de los partidos. El One Knoxville tiene la mayor tasa BTTS con 100% (4 partidos). El Naples tiene la tasa más baja con 0%.
Ángulo de Apuestas — Mercados BTTS
El BTTS Sí es más fiable cuando dos equipos con alta tasa BTTS se enfrentan. Cuando un equipo de alta BTTS se enfrenta a uno de baja BTTS, considera el BTTS No. Combina siempre con los datos de goles encajados.
Tablas de Estadísticas — USA
- MLS All-Star Ambos Marcan— División Underground
- MLS Next Pro Ambos Marcan— División Gold
- Major League Soccer Ambos Marcan— División Premium
- NISA Ambos Marcan— División Underground
- NPSL Ambos Marcan— División Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Ambos Marcan— División Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Ambos Marcan— División Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Ambos Marcan— División Women's Pro
- USL Championship Ambos Marcan— División Pro
- USL League One Ambos Marcan— División Pro
- USL League One Cup Ambos Marcan— División SemiPro
- USL League Two Ambos Marcan— División SemiPro
- USL Super League Ambos Marcan— División Women's Pro
- USL W League Ambos Marcan— División Women's Pro
- WPSL Ambos Marcan— División Women's Pro