FA Cup — Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
China · 2026/27
China — FA Cup 2026/27 — Estatísticas Detalhadas
Mais Vitórias:SHANGHAI SIPG (100%)
Mais Empates:Guizhou Xufengtang (100%)
Mais Derrotas:Shangyu Pterosaur (100%)Média Vitórias:23%Geral / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | V - E - D (HT) | % Vitórias | % Empates | % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |  Beijing Guoan | 3 | 3-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |  Changchun Yatai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 5 |  Shaanxi Union | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 7 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 3 | 2-1-0 | 67% | 33% | 0% |
| 8 |  Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 9 |  Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 10 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 11 |  Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 12 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 13 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 14 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 15 |  Wuxi Wugou | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 16 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 17 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 18 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 19 |  Ningbo Professional | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 |  Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 5 | 2-2-1 | 40% | 40% | 20% |
| 22 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 23 |  Dalian Zhixing | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 24 |  Yunnan Yukun | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 25 |  Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 26 |  Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 27 |  Shandong Luneng | 3 | 1-0-2 | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| 28 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 |  Langfang Glory City | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 30 |  Henan Jianye | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 31 |  Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 32 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| 33 |  Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 34 |  Nanjing City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 35 |  Dongguan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 36 |  Hebei Kungfu | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 37 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 38 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 39 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 40 |  Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 41 |  Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 42 |  Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 43 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 44 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 45 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 46 |  Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 47 |  BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 48 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 49 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 50 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 51 |  Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 52 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 53 |  Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 54 |  Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 55 |  Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 56 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 57 |  Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 58 |  Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 59 |  Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 60 |  Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 61 |  Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 62 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 63 |  Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 64 |  Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
FA Cup 2026 — Ganhar & Perder ao Intervalo
SHANGHAI SIPG lidera a FA Cup em vitórias ao intervalo geral com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (3V-0E-0D em 3 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 23%.
Guizhou Xufengtang empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Shangyu Pterosaur vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:Wuhan Three Towns (100%)Mais Empates:Yunnan Yukun (100%)Mais Derrotas:Suzhou Dongwu (100%)Média Vitórias:22%Casa / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Casa V - E - D (HT) | Casa % Vitórias | Casa % Empates | Casa % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Shaanxi Union | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-1-1 | 50% | 25% | 25% |
| 8 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 9 | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 10 | Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 11 | Rizhao Yuqi | 3 | 1-2-0 | 33% | 67% | 0% |
| 12 | Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 13 | Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-1-1 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| 14 | Yunnan Yukun | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 15 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 16 | Qingdao Red Lions | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 17 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 18 | Dalian Zhixing | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 19 | Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 20 | Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 21 | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 22 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Langfang Glory City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 25 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | Xi'an Ronghai | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 27 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 28 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 29 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 30 | Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 31 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 32 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 33 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 34 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 35 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 36 | Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 37 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 38 | Shandong Luneng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 39 | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 40 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
FA Cup 2026 — Resultados ao Intervalo em Casa
Wuhan Three Towns lidera a FA Cup em vitórias ao intervalo em casa com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (1V-0E-0D em 1 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 22%.
Yunnan Yukun empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Suzhou Dongwu vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.
Mais Vitórias:SHANGHAI SIPG (100%)Mais Empates:Wuhan Three Towns (100%)Mais Derrotas:Shenyang Urban (100%)Média Vitórias:34%Fora / Ganhar / Perder ao Intervalo
| # | Team | MP | Fora V - E - D (HT) | Fora % Vitórias | Fora % Empates | Fora % Derrotas |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 2-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Changchun Yatai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | Yunnan Yukun | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 | Qingdao Red Lions | 1 | 1-0-0 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | Shaanxi Union | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 14 | Shanghai Shenhua | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 15 | Dalian Zhixing | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 17 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 2 | 1-1-0 | 50% | 50% | 0% |
| 18 | Shandong Luneng | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 19 | Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 20 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 21 | Rizhao Yuqi | 2 | 1-0-1 | 50% | 0% | 50% |
| 22 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 23 | Dongguan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 24 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 25 | Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 26 | Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 27 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 28 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 29 | Langfang Glory City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 30 | Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 31 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 32 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 33 | Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 34 | Nanjing City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 35 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 36 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 37 | Xi'an Ronghai | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 38 | BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 39 | Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0% | 100% | 0% |
| 40 | Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 41 | Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 42 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 43 | Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 44 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 45 | Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 46 | Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 47 | Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 48 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
FA Cup 2026 — Resultados ao Intervalo Fora
SHANGHAI SIPG lidera a FA Cup em vitórias ao intervalo fora com uma taxa de vitória de 100% (2V-0E-0D em 2 jogos). A média da liga em vitórias ao intervalo é de 34%.
Wuhan Three Towns empata mais ao intervalo (100%), enquanto Shenyang Urban vai mais vezes a perder para o segundo tempo (100% de derrotas). Estes padrões são indicadores importantes para apostas ao intervalo.