MatchPulse
League Cup

League Cup — xG (Expected Goals)

England · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 4 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Bradford410.62.655.11.2771-3.6
2Barnsley38.72.908.12.6976-1.7
3Peterborough48.32.0910.72.6796+0.7
4Brentford37.92.644.01.34105+2.1
5Everton37.02.343.11.0381+1
6Chelsea36.72.244.41.4894+2.3
7Newcastle36.32.103.51.1655-1.3
8West Ham36.12.044.51.5095+2.9
9Fulham35.81.922.20.7363+0.2
10Tottenham25.52.742.91.4564+0.5
11Bournemouth25.32.672.01.0070+1.7
12Watford25.22.584.22.1025-3.2
13Middlesbrough34.81.613.91.2944-0.8
14Aston Villa24.62.294.42.1834-1.6
15Lincoln34.51.504.81.6166+1.5
16Arsenal24.22.111.30.6653+0.8
17West Brom24.22.102.91.4564+1.8
18Charlton24.22.104.22.0946-0.2
19Reading34.21.404.51.5153+0.8
20Sheffield Utd34.21.403.91.2952+0.8
21Leyton Orient33.91.294.81.6133-0.9
22Ipswich23.91.944.82.4255+1.1
23Leicester23.91.943.51.7723-1.9
24Blackburn23.91.933.51.7733-0.9
25Wolves33.91.293.91.2951+1.1
26Luton23.91.932.91.4532-0.9
27Liverpool23.81.903.81.9142+0.2
28Sunderland23.71.853.11.5542+0.3
29Brighton23.71.832.11.0554+1.3
30Fleetwood Town43.60.895.21.3071+3.4
31Crewe23.51.783.51.7844+0.5
32Plymouth23.51.771.60.8144+0.5
33Leeds23.51.773.51.7856+1.5
34Coventry23.21.614.52.2655+1.8
35Norwich33.21.074.51.5067+2.8
36Burnley23.21.582.21.0911-2.2
37Southampton22.91.454.22.1034+0.1
38Walsall22.91.454.52.2610-1.9
39Bristol City12.92.901.61.6101-2.9
40Manchester City22.71.372.01.0372+4.3
41Stevenage22.61.292.61.2924-0.6
42Crawley Town22.61.294.22.0921-0.6
43Wigan12.62.581.31.2911-1.6
44Grimsby12.62.581.31.2913-1.6
45Stockport County12.62.580.30.3211-1.6
46Cambridge United22.61.293.21.6122-0.6
47Millwall32.60.863.21.0722-0.6
48Blackpool22.31.135.52.7445+1.7
49Cardiff22.31.131.30.6544+1.7
50Shrewsbury22.31.132.61.2915-1.3
51AFC Wimbledon22.31.133.51.7714-1.2
52Hull City22.21.122.21.0812-1.2
53Crystal Palace22.21.102.91.4440+1.8
54Sheffield Wednesday21.90.971.30.6512-0.9
55Doncaster21.90.975.22.5824+0.1
56Burton Albion11.91.932.32.2512-0.9
57Barnet11.91.932.32.2512-0.9
58Tranmere11.91.930.60.6422+0.1
59Stoke City21.80.923.51.7631+1.2
60Salford City11.61.611.00.9711-0.6
61Milton Keynes Dons11.61.612.32.2514-0.6
62Colchester11.61.611.61.6102-1.6
63Oldham11.61.611.00.9702-1.6
64Newport County11.31.291.61.6111-0.3
65Manchester United11.31.291.61.6123+0.7
66Bristol Rovers11.31.291.00.9701-1.3
67Portsmouth11.31.292.62.5813-0.3
68Derby11.31.291.31.2912-0.3
69Preston21.30.653.91.9315-0.3
70Rochdale21.30.645.22.5824+0.7
71Bromley11.00.971.61.61110
72Accrington ST11.00.971.00.97120
73QPR11.00.970.60.64110
74Nottingham Forest11.00.971.61.6102-1
75Port Vale11.00.972.32.2503-1
76Wycombe11.00.971.61.61120
77Birmingham21.00.483.21.6126+1
78Huddersfield10.60.641.00.9711+0.4
79Swansea10.60.640.30.3201-0.6
80Northampton10.60.641.00.9701-0.6
81Oxford United10.60.641.00.9702-0.6
82Rotherham10.60.643.23.2214+0.4
83Gillingham10.60.643.53.5403-0.6
84Cheltenham10.60.642.92.9013+0.4
85Mansfield Town10.60.641.31.2903-0.6
86Notts County10.60.641.31.2911+0.4
87York10.60.641.61.6102-0.6
88Wrexham10.60.641.00.9701-0.6
89Bolton10.30.321.00.9701-0.3
90Chesterfield10.30.320.60.6401-0.3
91Swindon Town10.30.321.31.2923+1.7
92Exeter City10.00.001.91.93020
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
BarnsleyHigh xGF2.90
Bristol CityHigh xGF2.90
TottenhamHigh xGF2.74
Exeter CityLow xGF0.00
Swindon TownLow xGF0.32
ChesterfieldLow xGF0.32

LEAGUE xG STATS

92 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.45
League avg xGA/g: 1.55
Best overperformer: Manchester City (+4.3)
Biggest underperformer: Bradford (-3.6)

League Cup (England) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The League Cup (England) averages 1.79 xG per game this season. Barnsley creates the most chances with 2.90 xGF per game, while Millwall creates the fewest with 0.86 xGF per game. Fleetwood Town is over-performing their xG (7 goals vs 3.6 xGF) — regression likely. Bradford is under-performing (7 goals vs 10.6 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — England