MatchPulse
FA WSL

FA WSL — xG (Expected Goals)

England · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 8 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Chelsea W823.92.996.10.76274+3.1
2Arsenal W819.02.387.50.9389-11
3London City Lionesses W818.12.267.30.922010+1.9
4Manchester City W817.92.2412.41.552210+4.1
5Tottenham Hotspur W816.92.1213.21.652317+6.1
6Brighton W815.11.899.81.231511-0.1
7Liverpool W814.31.7810.11.261314-1.3
8Birmingham City W811.41.4320.32.541017-1.4
9Crystal Palace W89.11.1420.32.54717-2.1
10West Ham W88.91.1112.91.61914+0.1
11Manchester United W88.41.0613.01.62911+0.6
12Aston Villa W87.60.9517.92.231015+2.4
13Everton W87.60.959.81.2379-0.6
14Charlton Athletic W82.60.3320.42.55325+0.4
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
Chelsea WHigh xGF2.99
Arsenal WHigh xGF2.38
Everton WLow xGF0.95
Aston Villa WLow xGF0.95

LEAGUE xG STATS

14 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.62
League avg xGA/g: 1.62
Best overperformer: Tottenham Hotspur W (+6.1)
Biggest underperformer: Arsenal W (-11.0)

FA WSL (England) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The FA WSL (England) averages 1.62 xG per game this season. Chelsea W creates the most chances with 2.99 xGF per game, while Charlton Athletic W creates the fewest with 0.33 xGF per game. Tottenham Hotspur W is over-performing their xG (23 goals vs 16.9 xGF) — regression likely. Arsenal W is under-performing (8 goals vs 19.0 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — England