MatchPulse
UEFA Champions League

UEFA Champions League — xG (Expected Goals)

World · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 3 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Paris Saint Germain310.73.576.32.11145+3.3
2Bayern München310.43.482.40.78105-0.4
3Club Brugge KV39.63.199.43.1396-0.6
4Aston Villa39.23.055.31.76123+2.8
5Manchester City39.13.033.11.0395-0.1
6Barcelona38.42.804.91.65116+2.6
7Real Madrid37.92.655.61.86105+2.1
8Inter37.72.557.82.6256-2.7
9Liverpool37.62.535.11.70127+4.4
10Sporting CP36.82.284.01.3474+0.2
11Lens36.82.276.22.0837-3.8
12Borussia Dortmund36.82.264.91.6454-1.8
13Arsenal36.52.174.01.3362-0.5
14Manchester United35.81.933.61.2156-0.8
15AS Roma35.81.933.81.2585+2.2
16Real Betis35.61.882.60.8574+1.4
17Como35.61.873.21.06105+4.4
18Slavia Praha35.41.815.51.8547-1.4
19Villarreal35.21.736.52.1888+2.8
20RB Leipzig35.21.726.82.2638-2.2
21Fenerbahçe34.91.625.81.9239-1.9
22VfB Stuttgart34.81.612.80.9472+2.2
23Napoli34.61.547.02.3457+0.4
24Lask Linz34.31.438.12.7069+1.7
25Bodo/Glimt33.91.306.82.2649+0.1
26PSV Eindhoven33.91.294.41.4722-1.9
27Atletico Madrid33.91.294.41.4743+0.1
28AEK Athens FC33.81.275.31.7838-0.8
29Galatasaray33.21.086.62.2069+2.8
30Lille33.01.025.41.79410+1
31Sabah FA33.01.019.53.15360
32Shakhtar Donetsk32.80.922.90.9843+1.3
33Viking32.50.857.42.4759+2.5
34FC Porto32.50.837.12.3726-0.5
35Slovan Bratislava32.30.7710.53.50113-1.3
36Feyenoord32.10.726.62.2148+1.9
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
Bayern MünchenHigh xGF3.48
Club Brugge KVHigh xGF3.19
FeyenoordLow xGF0.72
FC PortoLow xGF0.83

LEAGUE xG STATS

36 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.87
League avg xGA/g: 1.87
Best overperformer: Liverpool (+4.4)
Biggest underperformer: Lens (-3.8)

UEFA Champions League (World) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The UEFA Champions League (World) averages 1.87 xG per game this season. Paris Saint Germain creates the most chances with 3.57 xGF per game, while Feyenoord creates the fewest with 0.72 xGF per game. Liverpool is over-performing their xG (12 goals vs 7.6 xGF) — regression likely. Lens is under-performing (3 goals vs 6.8 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — World