MatchPulse
Leagues Cup

Leagues Cup — xG (Expected Goals)

World · 2026

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 6 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Toluca411.02.742.10.52102-1
2Club America69.41.577.51.24116+1.6
3Leon58.91.787.11.42105+1.1
4Real Salt Lake47.11.785.01.2684+0.9
5Guadalajara Chivas37.12.372.40.7933-4.1
6Monterrey56.61.314.10.8297+2.4
7Chicago Fire46.51.635.31.3484+1.5
8Columbus Crew46.21.567.11.7865-0.2
9Necaxa35.61.883.61.1936-2.6
10Club Queretaro35.61.885.31.7816-4.6
11Portland Timbers35.61.883.91.2896+3.4
12Inter Miami35.31.785.91.9777+1.7
13CF Pachuca25.32.672.41.1935-2.3
14Vancouver Whitecaps34.81.584.21.3825-2.7
15Atletico San Luis34.41.485.31.78510+0.6
16Cruz Azul34.21.383.61.1943-0.2
17FC Cincinnati34.21.385.01.6863+1.8
18Minnesota United FC33.91.292.40.7943+0.1
19U.N.A.M. - Pumas33.91.294.21.3816-2.9
20Orlando City SC33.91.285.31.7855+1.2
21San Diego33.91.284.71.5855+1.2
22Austin43.90.964.51.1163+2.2
23Los Angeles FC33.91.285.31.7832-0.8
24Atlas33.61.194.71.5836-0.6
25Santos Laguna33.61.194.51.4835-0.6
26Atlante FC33.61.195.31.7827-1.6
27Philadelphia Union33.31.094.51.4834-0.3
28Charlotte23.31.633.01.4951+1.7
29FC Dallas33.31.095.61.8843+0.7
30Puebla33.00.995.61.87411+1
31Tigres UANL33.00.993.61.1922-1
32New York City FC32.70.894.81.5844+1.3
33FC Juarez32.70.895.01.6855+2.3
34Nashville SC32.70.893.00.9954+2.3
35Seattle Sounders32.70.8910.13.3645+1.3
36Club Tijuana32.40.794.71.5816-1.4
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
TolucaHigh xGF2.74
CF PachucaHigh xGF2.67
Guadalajara ChivasHigh xGF2.37
Club TijuanaLow xGF0.79
Seattle SoundersLow xGF0.89
Nashville SCLow xGF0.89

LEAGUE xG STATS

36 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.44
League avg xGA/g: 1.47
Best overperformer: Portland Timbers (+3.4)
Biggest underperformer: Club Queretaro (-4.6)

Leagues Cup (World) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Leagues Cup (World) averages 1.40 xG per game this season. Toluca creates the most chances with 2.74 xGF per game, while Club Tijuana creates the fewest with 0.79 xGF per game. Portland Timbers is over-performing their xG (9 goals vs 5.6 xGF) — regression likely. Club Queretaro is under-performing (1 goals vs 5.6 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — World